Wave Solder

在平时和客户们的会议交流中，因为Indium公司的产品线比较广，不同的客户群常常有针对自己独特的应用或是技术、销售服务等各种问题。

刚刚开始正式做一线销售，我有时候在会议前会有点紧张（特别是新的客户），怕自己回答不上客户的各种问题，帮不上忙。但是后来老练了一点，即使有些问题我自己真的不懂或是即时没有答案，但是总是可以“follow up”跟进的。会后积极主动利用各种资源找出答案，及时回复客户就好了。 现在的会议中， 我更会了“审时度势”的提问，从客户口中问出对项目、生意有用的信息。

最近我们在联系一个国际大客户做一些项目。 客户要求我们的科研副总裁李宁成博士(Dr.Ning-Cheng Lee)过来和他们交流，做一个roadmap meeting. 客户还提出相关的内容请李博士来讲。在我们和李博士内部交流后，决定先向客户提问，问清楚他们的需求后，我们才好“对症下药”。 比如说，客户想了解低银合金Low Ag Alloy, 低温合金在波峰焊中的使用Low Temp Alloy for Wave Soldering，微间距印刷0.3mm fine pitch printing等等。我们知道客户已经在使用别的供应商的SAC0307的低银合金了，并且客户的NPI工厂里没用波峰焊，但是为什么客户会叫我们来介绍呢？对现在的SAC0307合金不满意？哪些性能不满意需要改进呢？波峰焊又是怎么一回事呢？等等。 所以，我们也决定向客户提问，问清楚他们为什么有这些“需求”，真正的原因是什么……

有一个销售同事更有意思，当我告诉他我有一个做激光设备的客户（他们在使用我们含铟金属的材料），有一次我被客户的几个“资深工程师”追问关于铟金属的一些不太相关的问题，我根本不知道答案……我的销售同事建议说，以后出现这种情况，当你觉得他们问的东西有点过的时候，你可以反问他们一句“Why you asked this question? Why you want to know?”  这样就可以尝试挖掘出客户问问题的真正目的了。当然，要见机而行!

Cheers!

Pic: Google Image

Folks,

Patty arrived at work an hour early to prepare for her meeting with ACME CEO Mike Madigan. Nineteen days ago, he had asked her to develop an electronics assembly metric that would correlate with profitability. This metric would, in turn, be able to help pinpoint opportunities for improvement. He gave her 3 weeks, so she was two days early. Mike was in town to meet with Sam Watkins, the local plant manager, so he ordered that they meet. 

Patty had quickly identified non-material assembly cost per I/O (NMAC/I/O) as a good metric candidate. She went to five of ACME’s plants and, after a day or two at each one, she collected all of the data she needed to prove her point. Rob helped her by writing an Excel® macro that would calculate NMAC/I/O and plot it versus profitability. The correlation coefficient was an outstanding 0.983.

While visiting the five factories, she tried to learn why those that had a poor NMAC/I/O were performing poorly. After a little checking, she and Pete discovered that the poor performing sites typically had lines that were not time balanced, had slow component placement machines, and occasionally had very slow printers or solder paste with poor response to pause. There was even one plant that was using a full wave solder process, when only 8 solder preforms would have done the job in the reflow process. None of these “problems” would show up if you were only tracking line uptime. In light of this situation, she also developed a plan to use NMAC/I/O to identify and implement opportunities for improvement.

As Patty headed toward Sam’s office, Sam’s administrative assistant invited Patty into the conference room to allow Patty to get her laptop set up. Just as she finished setting up and her Powerpoint® presentation was on the screen, Sam and Mike walked in.

“Coleman, we’re counting on you to take us to the next level,” Mike said a little gruffly, so let’s get this show going.”

Patty looked at Sam and could tell that Sam was uncomfortable with his boss’s abrupt demeanor.

“I performed quite a bit of research and concluded that non material assembly cost per I/O is the best metric,” Patty started.

“That’s great Coleman, but what the hell is non material whatever you said,” Madigan interrupted.

Patty’s cell phone vibrated, but she ignored it.

“Non material assembly cost per I/O is the total cost of running a factory less the components, hardware, and PWBs used. Some people call this the conversion cost,” Patty answered.

“If you think about it, it is almost obvious that this is the best metric,” Patty went on, “it measures all of the non material cost divided by how much we produce.”

“I get it,” said Sam, “we are producing I/Os or solder joints, we measure the total cost to make solder joints and divide by the number of solder joints. It’s that simple.”

“Precisely,” Patty responded.

“I understand now, why uptime alone wasn’t a complete metric. You can be up and running, but be doing it inefficiently,” Mike said with a rare smile on his face.

Patty’s cell phone vibrated again.

“Exactly,” Patty commented.

“OK, so we are going to measure NMAC/I/O,” Mike commanded, “How does it correlate to profit?” He finished.

“It is nearly perfect,” Patty said.

They continued their discussions and reviewed Patty’s plan to improve productivity at the sites with a high NMAC/I/O. Patty would take the lead on this effort.

As Patty got up to leave, Mike commanded, “Oh, and Coleman, find out why so few people use NMAC/I/O.”

Patty thought this was something to discuss with the Professor.

As Patty walked out of Sam’s office, Clare Perkins, Sam’s Admin stopped her.

“Ms. Coleman, your mother-in-law called, Rob has been taken to the hospital,” Clare said.

Cheers,
Dr. Ron

Folks,

I’m taking a few moments from Wassail Weekend , held annually in my village, Woodstock VT, “The prettiest small town in America”, to write a post about last week’s workshops at ACI.

Indium colleague Ed Briggs and I gave a 3 hour presentation on “Lead-Free Assembly for High Yields and Reliability.” I think Ed’s analysis of “graping” and the “head-in-pillow” defect is the best around. 

There was quite a bit of discussion on the challenges faced by solder paste flux in the new world of lead-free solder paste and miniaturized components (i.e. very small solder paste deposits.) One of the hottest topics was nitrogen and lead-free SMT assembly. There seemed to be uniform agreement that solder paste users should be able to demand that their lead-free solder paste perform well with any PWB pad finish (e.g. OSP Immersion silver, electroless nickel gold, etc.) without the use of nitrogen. Not only does using nitrogen cost money, but it will usually make tombstoning worse. However, in the opinion of most people, nitrogen is a must for wave soldering and, since it minimizes dross development, it likely pays for itself.

After Ed and I finished, Fred Dimock, of BTU, gave one of the best talks I have ever experienced on reflow soldering. He discussed thermal profiling in detail, including the importance of assuring that thermocouples are not oxidized (when oxidized they lose accuracy). He also discussed a reflow oven design that minimizes temperature overshoot during heating, and undershoot when the heater is off. Understanding these topics is critical with the tight temperature control that many lead-free assemblers face.

Fred Verdi of ACI finished the meeting with an excellent presentation on “Pb-free Electronics for Aerospace and Defense.” Fred’s talk discussed the work that went into the “Manhattan Project.” A free download of the entire project report is available.

There appears to be agreement that acceptable lead-free reliability has been established for consumer products with lifetimes of 5 years or so, but not for military/aerospace electronics where lifetimes can be up to 40 years in harsh service conditions. These vast product lifetime and consequences of failure differences are depicted in the Fred's chart (above). Commercial products are in quadrant A and military/aerospace products in quadrant D.

One of the greatest risks faced by quadrant D products is tin whiskers. Fred spent quite a bit of time discussing this interesting phenomenon. One of the challenges of this risk is that there is no way to accelerate it, so you can’t do an equivalent test to accelerated thermal cycling or drop shock. Fred mentioned that there have now been verified tin whisker fails, the Toyota accelerator mechanism being a confirmed one.

In addition to tin whiskers, lead-free reliability for quadrant D products (with a service life of up to 40 years) in thermal cycle and other areas remains a concern.  I mention that tin pest was not on the list of issues for this quadrant.

Fred and the Manhattan Project Team have identified many "gaps" that need to be addressed to determine and mitigate the risk of lead-free assembly for quadrant D products.  They plan to start this approximately $100M program in 2013.

For those that missed this free workshop, ACI host Mike Prestoy is planning another one in 6 months.

Cheers,

Dr. Ron

Folks,

The Guadalajara (GDL), MX Chapter of the SMTA held their first meeting on November 9 and 10 at CETI in GDL.
Approximately 70 engineers from local companies attended. It was a great success. 

The agenda was:

November 9^th, 2011

0830-0900am    Registration and Exhibits Open

0900-0915am    Welcoming Remarks and Exhibition starts

0915-1045am    Inventec: “Reliability Assessment regarding Flux residues"

1045-1215pm    Sanmina-SCI: “Capabilities of a Failure Analysis Lab”

1215-1315pm    LUNCH

1315-1445pm    DEK: "Optimizing the Print Process for Mixed Technology"

1445 -1615pm   Vitronics Soltec: “How to Choose a Robust Configuration for Equipment
                          for Defect Free Soldering - Reflow, Wave and Selective”

1615-1745pm    KIC: “Fixing Reflow and Wave Related Defects as Well as How to Avoid 
                          Them in the First Place”

 November 10^th, 2011

0900-1030am    Sanmina-SCI: “Process development of 01005 components”

1030-1200pm    Indium: "Lead-Free Assembly for High Yields and Reliability."

1200-1300pm    LUNCH

1300-1430pm    Universal Instruments: "Tutorial on Failure Analysis"

1430-1600pm    Zestron: “PCB cleaning before conformal coating”

1600-1730pm    Kester: “Understanding Soldering Chemistries - Reducing Costly
                          Defects, Increasing Yields and Reliability.

I spoke on “Lead-Free Assembly for High Yields and Reliability." We had several raffles and gave away autographed copies of my book “The Adventures of Patty and the Professor,” which has just recently been formally published. 

As usual, I had dinner at Santo Coyote, one of my favorite restaurants, however my Mexican friends also took me to Sacromonte, claiming it had better food. They were correct. I was convinced to try chicken mole which I liked. It is tough to beat Santo Coyote’s ambiance, however.

I can’t cite data for this, but I am quite sure that GDL has the largest number of workers in electronics assembly outside of Asia. It is great news that they now have an SMTA chapter to help the local engineers network and continue to grow in their skills.  It was great to play a small part in this success, but most of the credit must go to Indium Corporation’s Ivan Castellanos who is chapter president and Kester’s Miguel Vazquez, chapter vice president.

Cheers,

Dr. Ron

Anyone who has used wave soldering to assemble PCBs knows about that chunky layer of metal that collects on the smooth surface of the molten solder. This is solder dross; it is composed of oxidized metals and impurities that collect as the molten solder contacts the air and manufacturing environment. This happens regardless of alloy and is a normal part of the process, often consuming up to 50% of the bar solder added to the solder pot. In the past, this dross was collected as waste and disposed of, but solder dross is more than 90% valuable metal. This value should be recovered.

Nowadays, typically, this dross is collected and returned to a metals supplier for recycling. Indium Corporation now offers two programs for recycling solder dross. The first program involves simply sending back dross waste in return for a portion of the metal value as a credit. The second option involves sending back dross, which is converted to bar solder (within the original spec) and returned, with you paying only a fee for processing. When dross arrives, regardless of which program is chosen, it is electrolytically refined and the pure metals are recovered and converted back into usable bar solder. Often, this reclaimed/recycled metal has a better purity than virgin metal.

Dross is not the only form of solder that can be recycled. For instance, when changing to a different alloy in a wave soldering process, the entire solder pot will need to be emptied. The old alloy can be collected and recycled, lowering the amount of capital necessary to switch alloys. Bar solder and wire that have not been used within the shelf life can also be recycled to get back some of their value.

Contact me if you want to discuss this.

Folks,

In a recent posting we discussed that the higher melting temperatures of lead-free solder require reflow soldering temperatures to be higher, thus more electricity is used in lead-free assembly. However, as we calculated, this increased use of electricity is very small compared to all electricity used in the world.

An additional concern that some have voiced is the claim that RoHS, with its lead-free requirement, actually makes the environment worse because more tin and silver is used in lead-free solders.   They argue that the increased use of these metals, creates mining pollution and has driven the price of these metals sky high. Let’s examine these claims.

Prismark has estimated that approximately 90,000 tons of solder are used in electronics, with about 80,000 used in wave soldering and 10,000 tons for SMT soldering. It is important to remember that electronics solder is a subset of all solder. All solder (alloys for brazing pipes etc) uses about 190,000 tons of tin. Solder is the single largest user of tin. See Figure 1. 

Figure 1. Solder is the largest end use of tin. Tin is the base material for almost all solders. 

If tin-lead solder were still used predominantly, approximately 57,000 tons of tin (90,000 x 63% tin) would be used annually. With lead-free solder, about 88,000 tons (90,000 x 98% tin) of tin are used per year. This is an apparent increase of about 30,000 MT of tin used each year. However, an interesting thing to consider is that lead-free solder is about 14% lighter than tin-lead solder. Knowing that, and knowing that solder used in wave soldering (remember wave soldering accounts for almost 90% of all solder used in electronics assembly) is consumed by volume not weight (i.e. assuming approximately the same fillet size), about half of this increase is canceled out. 

This is all a bit confusing however, so it may be best to just to look at tin use. According to the United States Geological Survey (USGS), about 300,000 tons of tin are mined each year. Figure 2 is a graph of world tin production at mines per year (this graph does not show recycled tin.)  The amount of refined tin used each year in the US is depicted in Figure 3. Figure 3 includes about 15,000 tons a year of recycled tin. Recycling solder is very cost effective. Scott Mazur just pointed out (Printed Circuit Design and Fab and Circuits Assembly, p 36, August 2011), that recycling solder dross is 10 times as cost effective as recycling aluminum cans.

Looking at these graphs, it is hard to say that the amount of tin used has gone up since RoHS. It would appear that tin use is likely more affected by the economy and that it is really difficult to see an effect from RoHS’s July 2006 enactment.

Figure 2. World Tin Production at Mines. 

Most wave soldering solders have low or no silver. So, about 3% of the 10,000 tons of SMT solder, or 300 MTs of silver, are used in electronics. This is about 1.5% of the 22,000 MTs of silver produced each year. Silver use in electronics does not make anyone’s list of top silver usage.

Figure 3. US consumption of tin has decreased since RoHS was enacted.

So electronics solder use since RoHS has not caused tin use to increase, nor is it a significant factor in silver use. Therefore it is highly unlikely that electronics' use of tin or silver has been a prime driver in their stunning price increases in 2011.

Folks,

Here is an interesting turn of events related to the reliability of lead-free (Pb-free) soldering reliability. 

I was reminded recently by something Carl Sagan said, or, actually, did not say: Billions and Billions Although this term is strongly associated with him, he never said it. Sagan believed that this term was connected to him because Johnny Carson mimicked him and used the term.

 
Although not even close to being in Sagan's league, I find that I am now equally unfairly associated with the term,  "lead-free solder is a grand success." This came about in an interview by Rob Speigel, which he summarized in a blog post.

In reading Speigel's post, you will see that,  "lead-free solder is a grand success," is Rob’s term, not mine. Well, Rob's post resulted in a string of postings on IPC’s Technet .

One person opined:

Irresponsible statements like "lead-free solder is a grand success" should NOT be ignored. Those who make such statements in the face of all of the contrary evidence should be noted, and treated as motivated only by greed. Lead-free soldering certainly has been known for many "thousand$" of successes.

I have learned that it is not even worth the bother to refute such statements with those who make them. It may be a "grand success" for PhDs who contract to solder paste companies, but it certainly has not been a "grand success" to literally thousands of companies dealing with the reliability elephant sitting in the room getting larger by the day, and the associated fallout as a result.

Ouch!

Another shared:

I disagree with the stated and implied affect of RoHS, on PWBs expressed in this article. Lead free assembly reduces reliability by 50%. There can be no doubt about that. There are too many studies that confirm lead free assembly significantly degrades reliability. There are so many studies that demonstrate a reduction in reliability that Rod's contention is almost laughable. We are now faced with increased failures of copper interconnections and dielectric material due to high assembly temperatures. There is an increase in crazing that can support CAF, significant copper dissolution, and cratering in assembly, Switching to lead free in most HDI applications is a significant challenge. Lead free assembly has a profound affect by degrading PWB's organic component (epoxy) due the temperature required and copper interconnection and also the exaggeration of the z-axis expansion of the dielectric.

I have asked for copies of the many reliability studies referred to. No response yet.

Finally someone hit the heart of the matter:

I'm curious if "grand success" were Dr.Lasky's words or Rob Spiegel's editorializing. Lasky does mention the lack of long term results, and Speigel, in the comments,  enumerates a number of reliability problems. ISTM that neither truly believes  those words.

Correct!, Thanks. 

Here was my response that I posted on Technet:

Folks,

Pete is correct. I never said lead-free implementation was a grand success. These were Rob's words in his blog post. 

I have said repeatedly that adequate lead-free reliability has been demonstrated for consumer products like mobile phones, PCs, portable electronics with service lives less than 5 years. This level of reliability has been demonstrated in numerous studies and more importantly with field data. Vahid Goudarzi, of Motorola, stated that field reliability of lead-free assembled mobile phones has been equal or better than leaded assembly units. His data go back to 2001 (not 2006. Motorola started early for reasons discussed below).

 The reason Motorola shipped early with lead-free products is due to the fact that lead-free solder does not spread as well. Because of this poorer spreading, Motorola was able to decrease lead spacings without getting shorts, thus increasing the amount of electrical function in a smaller space. Since increased function in a smaller space is the defining attribute of portable electronics, the importance of this lead-free advantage cannot be overstated. Admittedly, lead-free's poorer wetting is a challenge in other regards, especially hole fill in wave soldering, but the Motorola Droid X2 could not be assembled with leaded solder, there would be too many shorts. Since the packaging density of the iPhone and similar devices is on a par with the Droid X2, I suspect this statement is true for most mobile products.

I have also repeatedly stated that lead-free reliability for long term service, mission critical devices has not been demonstrated. As a result, these types of devices should not consider lead-free solder at this date.

I regularly discuss these topics in my blog (http://blogs.indium.com/blog/an-interview-with-the-professor). The most recent post shows a striking photo of leaded solders spreading -which is too "good" for portable electronics.

Cheers,

Dr, Ron

Folks,

I have often pointed out that SAC solder's poor wetting is both a curse and Godsend.  It is a curse when trying to fill a through-hole in wave soldering, and a Godsend when assembling close lead spacings as shown in the image (below). Indium Corporation colleague and friend, Mike Fenner (image below), pointed out that, when I say that, "SAC solder doesn't wet well", I should be saying, "it doesn't spread well". His explanation follows:

SAC is different from SN63, and I think it is helpful to explain the difference by making a subtle differentiation between wetting and spreading.

The way that solders spread and wet to a surface is a balance of competing forces. We have surface tension acting to make the molten solder shrink into a ball, and wetting forces trying to make it spread across the surface. Wetting is also the action of the solder dissolving into the surface to form an intermetallic. This intermetallic is essence of the solder joint. The balance changes with different alloys, surfaces, and processes.

Most people are very familiar with the way that tin lead solders behave - and that governs their expectations. The different balance in SAC means the solder tends to spread less for the same wetting and, therefore, can give the impression of a lower quality joint. This lack of spread is usually expressed as 'poor wetting'.

I would explain this by saying the “active ingredient” in both solder families is tin. SAC alloys have a ~50% higher concentration of tin than the Sn63 solder alloy. This gives them a higher surface tension which increases the balling (coalescing) force. At the same time, the less dilute tin, in SAC solders, dissolves into a surface faster. So the final SAC joint can have a well formed intermetallic, but not high spread. These relationships will vary with surface finish and, of course, flux chemistry and process conditions come into play, but that’s for another day. Meanwhile I hope this simplified explanation helps.

Thanks Mike!

Cheers,

Dr Ron

The solder image is courtesy of Vahid Goudarzi of Motorola.

There seems to be a growing trend to use a low-Ag or Ag-free solder alloy for Surface Mount Technology (SMT) electronics assembly, similar to what is commonly offered for bar solder, used in wave and selective soldering.

For through-hole performance, the strength and stability come from the entire barrel of solder, whereas it is usually the foot and heel fillets that give SMT solder joints their strength.

Lets talk about the other issue with using a eutectic solder alloy in SMT: tombstoning.  One of the benefits of using the SAC (tin-silver-copper) alloy for SMT and solder paste, is that it has a built-in plastic range, similar to that of Sn62 (62Sn 36Pb 2Ag).  It is this plastic range that prevents tombstoning, and takes into account the inconsistent heating of the solder across the part (which is the sole cause of tombstoning).  Switching to a eutectic alloy eliminates the plastic range and opens the door for tombstoning.

Any powder manufacturing issues, such as the inconsistent distribution of dopants throughout the alloy and powder matrix, takes a back seat to the surface mount reliability concerns. 

There are other alternatives, such as SAC0307 (99Sn 0.3Ag 0.7Cu)… But, with the price of Ag finally coming down, and a long history of SAC usage, we don’t think it’s going to be a major player.

Next time, we'll talk about the manufacturing and costs associated with low-Ag and Ag-free alloys. 

I hope this helps. Contact me with any questions.

最近越来越多的客户提到了选择性焊接Selective Soldering. 我之前对此了解比较少，所以特意问了同事们学习了一下，发现选择性焊接有以下几点：

---和波峰焊焊接(wave soldering)比较相似，通常在SMT贴片回流后。

---和波峰焊焊接的不同点在于，selective soldering不需要整个板子都经过solder wave; 而是有一个固定的nozzle，对需要焊接的那一小部分进行”wave” soldering

---选择性焊接(Selective soldering)是整个板子不用经过第二次温度剧增(thermal excursion)，不单单保护了板子 (reduce CTE mismatch)，而且保护了已经焊接在板子上的对温度变化敏感的原件。

---选择性焊接(Selective soldering) 和波峰焊焊接相比，一般使用较少量的波峰焊助焊剂(wave flux)和锡棒(solder bar)；但是有些选择性焊接的设备需要往pot里放实心锡线(solid solder wires)而不是锡棒。

Cheers!

Pic & Video:Youtube

PS： 谢谢同事Eric Bastow的分享。虽然用wave flux and solder bar少了点，影响了revenue; 但是实心锡线是比廉价的solder bar利润高出很多的产品，所以还好啦：-）

Folks,

It was Wednesday evening and I had just finished a brief pitch on applications of SPC  to a group of twenty. I was followed by Jim Hall,  he spoke of process mapping using SIPOC.  So did these folks have solder paste under their fingernails, or wave solder flux stains on their shirts, or, perhaps, a solder preform or two stuck in their pant leg cuff? None of these souls would have had any of this type of trace evidence of electronic assembly on their person. You see, they were all medical doctors and students at Harvard’s  famed medical school.   (I hope it is OK that the proud dad shares that my daughter Jessica is a colleague of these folks.)

Jim and I were presenting to the doctors, because they are interested in process optimization in the healthcare industry. The event was hosted by Dr. Andy Ellner.  He is a professor and doctor at the medical school and is a focal point for these process improvement efforts. I was introduced to him in the summer of 2009 by Dartmouth’s  new President Jim Kim. 

In November of 2009, Jim Hall, our colleague Larry Parah, and I facilitated Andy’s team in dramatically improving the prescription refill process in Brigham and Women’s Hospital Clinic.  Jim and I plan on working with Andy in similar efforts over the next year or two.

The most striking thing that Jim and I left with on Wednesday evening was how profoundly interested these doctors and students were in healthcare process optimization. The Q&A session lasted nearly an hour.

Ah, yes, would that our many colleagues in electronic assembly were as interested in optimizing their processes!

Folks,

I thought I would take a stab at listing the minuses, pluses, and “it’s a wash” aspects of assembling with lead-free (LF) solder. Here are my first thoughts. Please tell me what I missed or disagree.

Cheers,

Dr. Ron

Minuses

1.    Pb-Free requires higher reflow temperatures
The Tm for LF solders, in the 217-229C range, has created numerous challenges:

a.      PWB warpage and damage

b.      Component damage

c.      New defect modes such as graping and head-in-pillow defects (although concurrent reduction in solder paste deposit sizes for 0201 and 01005 passives and 0.3 mm CSPs also exacerbate these defects)

d.      Defects related to increased oxidation

e.      Increases in voiding

f.       Increases in tombstoning

2.      The higher cost of LF solder, mostly for wave soldering

a.      It’s not just the silver, tin is much more expensive than lead

3.      Poorer wetting of LF solders, creating the most significant challenges in wave soldering

4.      More rapid copper pad dissolution on PWBs in wave soldering

5.      LF solder attack of wave solder machine components

6.      LF reliability in harsh thermal cycle testing appears poorer than tin-lead solders

7.      Tin Whiskers

It’s a Wash

1.      Short-term reliability in consumer product-type environments

2.      Protection of the environment if discarded products are improperly disposed of

a.      Lead in electronics has never been shown to cause a problem in land fills

3.      Since July 2006, about $3 trillion of products have been manufactured with LF solder, with no “the sky is falling”-type of problems

Pluses

1.      LF solder's poor wetting enables finer lead spacings (see photo Courtesy of Motorola)

a.      It may be argued that some modern electronic products (e.g. smartphones) could not be made with tin-lead solder

2.      It is safer to recycle LF solders, especially if performed in a non-controlled environment

The "wave soldering flux deactivation temperature question" arises every few weeks, and the easy answer is that wave solder fluxes are designed to see the temperature of the wave.

Now, in order to pass SIR testing, the test boards with the wave fluxes are sent through the wave pattern up, not in direct contact with the molten alloy. They still see the majority of the heat from the wave.

The “deactivation” temperature varies from process to process because of the differences in board complexity, flux application, and preheat, as it is really a matter of total energy input, rather than a specific temperature.

The potential for reduced SIR is the main issue, not necessarily ECM or corrosion.  With a rosin-free flux, there may be some visual clues, as well. If you see that the flux has dried to a white, powdery residue that may be a sign that it had not seen temperatures.

We get this question mostly from corporations that believe they can use the same flux formulation for wave soldering and hand assembly / rework. Wave fluxes are not designed for hand soldering, and will more than likely cause some sort of downstream issue if used as such.

Feel free to ask me any questions about your process!  From One Engineer To Another!

I just received a customer inquiry regarding a phenomenon that is little studied and even less quantified; “How many times can I reflow a solder alloy before damaging the solder joint?”

As you may already know, each time you bring a solder alloy above its liquidus temperature, it continues to dissolve the metallizations on the substrate to which you are soldering, as well as the metallizations on the leads of the component being attached. With modern processes, a 3-time “excursion” is common, especially with double-sided reflow and rework. Typically, the solder applied with paste is not reflowed again during the wave, because, through the use of pallets or selective soldering, it doesn't get quite hot enough to melt. That said, in such a case, the solder joint may become hot enough to receive some damage. To me, the most interesting thing with crystalline intermetallic layers, is that they don’t need to reach liquidus to form larger crystals. So a temperature excursion close to the liquidus may also increase the crystal structure size.

Another factor is surface metallizations, especially easy-to-solder surfaces such as gold or HASL. With gold, molten Sn/Pb solder at 200°C will dissolve at 35u-inch/s. So, a fine flash layer, such as 3-5u-inch, is gone within the first second, and the actual intermetallic is formed to the underlayment; most commonly nickel (Ni). This is similar with HASL, as the HASL layer is consumed into the solder joint at liquidus, and the intermetallic layer is formed with what is beneath the HASL.

The intermetallic layer will increase with time above liquidus (TAL) and also with temperature, with hotter dissolving more of the surface. This is why there are operating temperature limitations on the final solder joint, such as no more than 90% of the solidus of the alloy, in degrees Kelvin.

Another factor that affects grain structure, besides TAL and peak temperature, is cool-down rate. A faster cool-down rate will form a smaller crystalline grain structure, but keep in mind that a too-fast cool down rate may result in stresses being trapped in the grain structure from the CTE mismatch between the component and the substrate.

It has been our experience that 3 temperature excursions is the accepted limit (by most companies that I work). But, the only recommendation that we can offer is that you try “worst-case” scenarios, and have ALT testing and SEM cross-sections performed on real-world products in which 3, 4, and 5 excursions have taken place. Your particular case may be unique - it is well-worth determining your particular situation.

Folks,

Answers to the quiz of a few weeks back......

Phil and Rob had agreed to ask the GM if it was OK to ask the tech and engineers at some of their subcontractors to take the test anonymously. Over a period of two months Phil and Rob got 52 people to agree, almost all of them after Phil or Rob agreed to take them to lunch. They asked Patty to grade the “exams.” Today Patty would reveal the results.

“Phil, this is one of the best bets I have ever made,” teased Rob.

Everyone at the lunch table chuckled, but the look on Phil’s face said he expected to lose. Rob has said that he thought the average score would be less than 70%, Phil insisted that it would be greater than 85%. In asking the different folks to take the test, invariably Phil started asking questions not on the test. He was surprised that no one knew what tin pest was. He even asked how to time balance a chip shooter and flexible placer, only one in twenty knew.

As Patty approached the lunch table, the ensemble held their breath.

“OK, Patty, tell us the bad news,” Phil said in a resigned tone.

“Rob wins, the average score was 58%,” Patty said getting to the point. “Here are the answers and percentages on each problem,” she went on:

1.    What is the composition of SAC305?
96.5% tin, 3.0% silver, 0.5% copper. 60% got this right.

2.     What are tin whiskers?
Tin whiskers are metal whiskers that can “grow” from tin plating on component leads. They are mitigated by 2% bismuth in the tin, a nickel overplate of the lead copper, a matte tin finish, and a few other mitigation approaches. 40%.

3.     In a stencil aperture, what is the area ratio?
The ratio of the area of the aperture opening divided by the area of the side walls. This ratio is typically used for circular and square apertures. It is equal to D/4t, where D is the diameter of square side and t is the stencil thickness. 40%

4.    What is an approximate peak temperature for a reflow oven in lead-free assembly?
Any answer 235 to 250C accepted. 90%

5.     A board is inspected after wave soldering and one lead is not soldered to the board. The board is run through the wave solder machine again and has the same defect on the same lead. What is the most likely cause of the defect?

a.       The solder temperature is too low.

b.      The pad on the board is oxidized.

c.       The preheat temperature is too high.
b 70%

6.     What are local fiducials on a PWB for?
Local fiducials are located near the pads of a component with fine lead spacings to assure accurate placement. 70%

7.     What does "thixotropic" mean in regard to solder pastes?
The viscosity decreases with increasing shear stress. Hence, during printing the viscosity drops as the paste is forced through the aperture, aiding good aperture fill. It increases as the printed deposit rests, minimizing slump. 20%

8.     A chip shooter places passives at a rate of 36,000 per hour. It is placing 300 passives on a PWB, how many seconds will the chipshooter take to place the passives on one board?
300/36000 = 1/120 hr = 30 seconds. 90%

9.     A reflow oven belt speed is 100 cm/min. The PWB is 40 cm long. What is the minimum cycle time that the oven can support?
The amount of time that the belt needs to cover 40 cm is 40/100 = 0.4 minutes = 24 seconds. This is the minimum cycle time the oven can support. 40%

10.   What is "tombstoning"?
Tombstoning is observed when a passive component's terminations experience unequal wetting forces which are strong enough to lift one end of the passive so that it looks like a tombstone. 60%

Overall average score 58%.

“Wait a minute Patty, your answers are too demanding,” Phil shouted.

“Calm down Phil, I gave full credit for anything close,” Patty responded.

In unison, almost everyone at the table sighed “Yikes.”

Patty interjected, “One person who received a 70% commented after completing problem 9, ‘I didn’t think I would need a PhD in math to do this quiz.’ “

All agreed that organizations like the SMTA and IPC were more needed than ever.

Welcome! I am a chemical engineer experienced in an R&D setting and jumping into a new position in marketing here at Indium Corporation. Initially, in this blog, I will focus on my journey getting started, learning all the new facets of the business here, and transitioning from my former R&D mindset into something more outward facing and communications-based. I am relatively new to this world of social networking too, so I’m sure there will be plenty of growth in that direction as well. Hopefully, you will enjoy taking this journey with me, learning vicariously. I would certainly appreciate any pointers from you. 

Officially my job title is “Product Support Specialist”.  I’m learning that it means a lot of things, for example, being an expert in PCB assembly, the different products that are used for PCB assembly, and being able to convey that useful information to everyone that is interested. “Everyone” really could be anyone in this case: existing customers, potential customers, customers that haven’t even thought about how solder paste or another product might make their process easier, people who just have an interest in electronic materials… and people here at Indium, R&D, production, our sales team, and the list goes on. In time this blog (with any luck) will be a good resource for a lot of helpful information to all of these people.

As I am completing my first week here at Indium, I am feeling very optimistic about my new position and my capacity to contribute. Overall, this week has been like riding a wave of information, and just trying to scoop up as much as I can. I have been surprised by how much my previous experience in electronics materials is helping me. Even though the materials here are significantly different, I have been exposed to a lot of the same processes before (screen printing, mixing, metal powders, etc.), so I just have to make the mental links and note the differences. For instance, I was fascinated, while touring one of our manufacturing facilities yesterday, that we are using the same mixer I used in my former company’s pilot lab, just about 20 times larger. Also, we are packaging some of the material in the same cartridges and syringes I had previously filled by hand on so many occasions.

On a more personal note: Before starting Monday, I had mostly been filled with a sense of gratitude for having found a job that I really love, and a little bit with some apprehension about fitting into a new role, living up to all of the expectations (from myself, my co-workers, my new boss…). I suppose a long period of searching for employment, with all of the probing and feelings of rejection and such, really does change one’s perspective of their competencies. It has been difficult in the past months listening to the news and hearing reports of unemployment numbers staying the same or getting worse, and in addition having benefits for unemployment on shaky ground. In some ways it felt like people who were still employed might not understand how difficult it can be to find a job, even a job that doesn’t live up to the expectations one might have had 5 years ago. I just thought that I should note that there is still very much reason to hold on to hope: it is possible to find a wonderful job that fits your qualifications, and continue on after all of this economic turmoil. What was most important during my time searching was to keep searching for that job that would further my career the way I wanted it to, to keep applying to positions that might seem out of reach at the time, and to not get discouraged, because despite all of the unanswered emails and resumes, only ONE needs to come through… and that one could be awesome. Since Monday, of course, my doubts have been fading quickly, and I am still filled with that sense of gratitude, which I don’t think I would have appreciated without having gone through these tumultuous times.

前段時間和Indium公司研究波峰焊助焊劑的Jim Hevel一起出差，進一步了解了波峰焊助焊劑這種產品。 雖然電子產品組裝的焊接技術從波峰焊技術(wave soldering)到表面裝貼(SMT)轉變以來，波峰焊助焊劑從使用比率來講是少了；但是因爲整體的市場在增大，通孔焊接技術還是具有一定成本的優勢，某些特殊元件的焊接需要，還有部分簡易產品和不需要微型化的產品等因素，通孔焊接技術還是存在並佔有一定市場的。那麽波峰焊助焊劑也一直在業界被廣爲使用。

在波峰焊技術的焊接過程中，大家最關注可焊性(solderability)兩方面的問題：Hole Fill & Bridge.  良好的爬錫/填充孔，還有不要出現橋接現象。Jim說他在設計公司系列波峰焊產品的過程中，除了根據客戶要求和行業IPC規定外，solderability就排第一位了。請看以下表格。

適應市場無滷化的需求，Indium公司有酒精基(Alcohol based)和水基(VOC-Free)的無滷波峰焊助焊劑。

Cheers!

Picture: Jim Hevel with Indium Corporation

PS: Jim來自Indium公司的芝加哥工廠。剛好Jim在西雅圖那兩天，棒球賽是西雅圖水手隊對決芝加哥白襪隊(Baseball, Seattle Mariners VS Chicago White Sox)，西雅圖主場。Jim第二天問我有沒有看球賽…不熱愛棒球的我當然什麽都不知道。 經過Jim給我的棒球知識補充，讓我豁然開朗！怪不得某一個客戶曾經問我支持哪個隊，當時我心裏還嘀咕要不要請他一起看棒球呢…現在回想，人家只不過以爲你是“當地人”，肯定知道當地的球隊，找你侃侃對球隊的看法而已，哈哈。

Folks,

Patty and Rob return from their honeymoon.......

Patty had just finished some emails and was ready to head off to meet Rob and some of their buddies for lunch. When she and Rob returned from China a month ago, Sam, the site GM, told both of them he was giving them an extra week of vacation for their honeymoon. Their China trip had been an unqualified success in helping the China teams achieve more productivity and higher yields. Sam had received numerous positive reports from the Chinese managers involved. There were several requests to have Patty and Rob stay a year in China to help with the many process issues that the China team has. Fat chance of that happening, Sam needed Patty and Rob here! Sam also mentioned that he knew that the trip was a little stressful coming so close to their wedding, so the extra week was ACME’s gift to the young couple for their sacrifices.

The wedding went off without a hitch. Patty was touched at how choked up her dad was in “giving her away.” The weeding reminded Rob and Patty how close they were to their parents. They both agreed that the support of their parents was crucial in any success that they had in life.

For their honeymoon they decided to tour France, Italy, and Germany. Rob was really proud that he handled the languages a little better than she did. Of all the things that they saw, they were most impressed with Pompeii. Because the city was covered in hot ash in a matter of moments, it was as if Pompeii was frozen in 70AD.  Visiting Pompeii was like stepping back into the time of the Caesars.

Truth be told, Patty was happy things were back to “normal.” It was pleasant to have their working schedule and to go home to their apartment at night. A couple nights a week, and most Saturdays and Sundays, she and Rob played golf. He had improved somewhat and she was a little annoyed that so far this year he had beaten her more than half of the time….and yes, he was rubbing it in.

As Patty approached the cafeteria she heard a friendly but heated discussion.

“No way can you evaluate an assembly company with just 10 questions,” Phil Anderson stated emphatically.

“I’m really convinced we can, I’ve thought it through a lot,” responded Rob.

“What’s the spirited debate about?" asked Patty as she sat down.

“Rob thinks you can evaluate an assembly company by asking a lead process engineer only 10 questions. Phil thinks he’s nuts,” responded Patty’s best friend Jan Curtis.

“I’ve thought about this quite a bit,” said Rob. “I’ve just finished reading Malcolm Gladwell’s ‘Blink.’”  “Gladwell claims that often the best judgments can be made quickly with just a sampling of data,” Rob went on.

“Be specific,” challenged Phil.

“OK, I actually developed 10 proposed questions to evaluate a assembler, let me list them and then defend them. Maybe you guys have better ones,” said Rob. 

Patty thought, as she heard this, that it was good news that ACME was looking to buy more assembly companies to handle their ever increasing workload……not like AJAX that was laying folks off.

Rob had come prepared, he actually had some print outs. His ten questions were:

1.      What is the composition of SAC305?

2.      What are tin whiskers?

3.      In a stencil aperture, what is the area ratio?

4.      What is an approximate peak temperature for a reflow oven in lead-free assembly?

5.      A board is inspected after wave soldering and one lead is not soldered to the board. The board is run through the wave solder machine again and has the same defect on the same lead. What is the most likely cause of the defect?

a.       The solder temperature is too low.

b.      The pad on the board is oxidized.

c.       The preheat temperature is too high.

6.       What are local fiducials on a PWB for?

7.       What does thixotropic mean in regard to solder pastes?

8.       A chip shooter places passives at a rate of 36,000 per hour. It is placing 300 passives on a PWB, how many seconds will the chipshooter take to place the passives on one board?

9.       A reflow oven belt speed is 100 cm/min. The PWB is 40 cm long. What is the minimum cycle time that the oven can support?

10.   What is tombstoning?

“You have got to be kidding,” shouted Phil, “everyone will score 100% on that test.”

Jan chimed in, “I’m not so sure. We hang around people all day who study this stuff. I’m not sure the typical process ‘engineers’ have enough time to study and learn new things…..Remember the 'water in the solder' and the 'isopropyl in solder paste' incidents?”

At this comment, Phil spit up his ice tea and started choking from laughter. One of their friends, Sally Herman, had been sent to a recently acquired company to help them with assembly process issues. One of the “process engineers” introduced himself by bragging that he was saving the company money by taking used, dried solder paste and mixing it with isopropyl alcohol so that the paste could be used again. Later in the day, the same chap shared that he thought he had a solution to the poor hole fill problem in lead-free wave soldering…….the solder was too thick, if it was mixed with water it would fill the holes better he opined.

Jan added, “As a minimum these questions act as a good screening process.”

Rob interjected, “That’s my point. I’m not saying this tells us everything, but you will agree that if a lead process engineer can’t handle these questions, it is unlikely he or she would be able to solve graping, or the head-in-pillow defect, right?"

All at the table murmured agreement.

“On second thought, maybe you have something here Rob," Phil said. “What do you propose as a passing score," he went on?

“Seventy percent,” Rob answered. 

Are Rob’s questions reasonable to evaluate an electronics assembler? What are the answers? Comment with your answers. Stay tuned to find out.

Cheers,

Dr. Ron

The image above is from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Blinkgla.jpg

在表面貼裝技術(SMT, Surface Mount Technology)以前，主要流行的是波峰焊(Wave Soldering).   雖然現在大部分的電子產品焊接都是SMT，但是某些不需要微型化(miniaturization)的產品，如DVD播放機，還有波峰焊的低成本優勢，都是波峰焊技術至今還存在的主要原因。 Indium公司的資深顧問Dr. Ron Lasky曾經説道，波峰焊技術在我們的下一代，下下一代，都應該還存在的。

最近又有一個客戶和我們一起探討波峰焊助焊劑(wave flux)的殘留問題。他們使用的是免洗(no clean)助焊劑。正是因爲免洗，所以各種不同的助焊劑，有不同量的殘留。 而客戶的客戶，也在對殘留的多少有一定的疑問。 其實現在在IPC的規定中，沒有具體規定免洗波峰焊殘留的多少是符合要求的。 最後我們根據客戶對焊接外觀和可靠性的綜合要求，推薦了最適合的一款產品。

Cheers!

PS: 一些年長的客戶或是合作夥伴總是開玩笑說“我在這個行業工作的時間一定比你的年齡長。想當年手工焊接或是波峰焊的時候……”

Pic: http://enc.ic.polyu.edu.hk/Zhengde/z2003/ws/images/pic2.png