Soldering Fluxes

I was recently asked to gather some data comparing Indium Corporation’s tabbing fluxes and our largest competitor’s leading tabbing fluxes. Using a new method of solder spread testing found in an upcoming issue of Global Solar Technology, two Indium Corporation tabbing fluxes were directly compared to three of the leading competitor’s fluxes.

The test consists of these simple steps:

• Apply flux to cell
• Dry flux on cell
• Apply solder preforms on cell metallization
• Reflow on a hotplate
• Measure solder length

Finally, the measurements are plugged into the equation:

S = (L_f/L_i)100-100

                   Where:         S = Increase in preform length

                                      L_f= Final solder length

L_i= Initial length of preform

In the end, the Indium Corporation tabbing fluxes (GS-3434 and GS-5454) both caused the solder to spread ~44% further on a given cell – compared to only 13%, 15%, and 16% for the competitors' fluxes.

If you’d like to learn more about the test method or the results, or want help conducting your own evaluation, send me an email at solar@indium.com.

Maria Durham, Indium’s new Technical Specialist in Semiconductor and Advanced Assembly Materials, has been doing some research on indium lead (In/Pb) solder alloys. We chatted about her findings this week. 

 [Andy C. Mackie: ACM] Which indium/lead solder alloys are most common, and what are their properties?

[Maria Durham: MD] Firstly, the use of lead-(Pb-)containing solders in some soldering applications is restricted due to local environmental and RoHS compliance, but there are still many applications where they are  allowed. Many military, aerospace, and industrial equipment uses, as well as many applications related to vehicles, are exempt. The table below shows the most common indium/lead (In/Pb) alloys (pink) and their properties, sorted by liquidus temperature; the higher of the two melting points (solidus and liquidus) seen for non-eutectic alloys. In blue are three comparison materials.

Indalloy 205 is the most commonly used, probably because it has the closest liquidus temperature to the tin/lead eutectic (183°C), 63Sn/37Pb (Indalloy 106). This means it can be reflowed using a standard Sn/Pb eutectic profile. The next most common alloys that are used are Indalloy7, 204, and 206.  Besides the melting range, indium has comparable thermal and electrical conductivity to standard materials.

[ACM] What makes indium-lead (In/Pb) solders so attractive, and why have we seen a recent resurgence in their usage?

 [MD] One main attraction to using indium/lead (In/Pb) solder alloys in soldering to precious metal surfaces is that, unlike tin-containing solders, they do not leach gold. That is, gold does not dissolve in them to any appreciable extent. During discussions at Semicon West in 2011, one of our California customers reported going through 8 simulated reflows with Indalloy 205 in contact with a gold surface with no loss of joint strength and no joint embrittlement. That is pretty impressive. Note that embrittlement is often caused by gold-intermetallic formation. It has been noted that even at 250°C, 50In/50Pb dissolves Au at a rate 13 times slower than it does into 63Sn/37Pb, although this, of course, is a kinetic, not a solubility limit, study.

The higher melting Indalloy 164 (92.5Pb/5In/2.5Ag) has the lowest coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of all of the In/Pb solders and is able to withstand the higher temperature excursions that can be seen in step-soldering type applications (where a very high melting solder is used to form the first joint, followed by a next lowest melting alloy, and so on). This is seen in applications such as power electronics assembly, where the first step solder is often used for die-attach either as a solder paste, wire, or preform. The high melting point helps the solder withstand the operational temperatures associated with under-the-hood electronics, in applications such as engine control modules, where Indalloy 151 (92.5Pb/5Sn/2.5Ag) or Indalloy 163 (95.5Pb/2Sn/2.5Ag) are most commonly used. In/Pb solder is excellent on very rigid structures such as ceramic-to-metal or ceramic-to-ceramic. The desired solidus / liquidus temperature range can be adjusted by changing the indium:lead ratio, making it very easy to “dial in” the alloy to a specific reflow process.

Another attraction to using In/Pb solders is that they exhibit good fatigue resistance in thermal cycling from -55°C to 125°C.  In testing, the 50In50Pb solder joint fatigue life is about 100 times greater than that for 63Sn/37Pb.

 [ACM] What fluxes are used in these applications, and how are they formulated differently?

 [MD] The fluxes most compatible with the lower melting point (<200°C) indium-containing solders are NC-SMQ-80 (solder paste) or the lower-tack TacFlux® 012 (suitable for use with wire, preforms, and spheres). These are no-clean fluxes, specifically formulated for lower temperature reflow.  Under appropriate low temperature reflow these fluxes leave behind benign residues that do not need to be cleaned off (“no-clean” flux), although they are often cleaned off in most practical applications, usually to ensure reliable wirebonds absent of flux spatter.

 To learn more, please contact us.

 Cheers!  Andy

Folks,

Let’s look in on Patty and Pete and see how they are handling Rex “The Torrent.”

Patty wanted to give Pete a little more exposure so she nodded to him to chime in.

“It is true that Pinnacle’s line cost only 70% of Optoplace’s line and it does have a lower ‘cost of ownership’ in that it costs less to own, but we lose our shirt because of its 6 hours per week less uptime,” Pete began.

Torant stormed in, “There ain’t no way that 6 hours a week can make up for 30% savings in cost of ownership. We must be talking about over $600,000 dollars difference in capital cost.”

Patty heard this comment and wondered why people that make poor arguments need to add bad grammar, too.

“Torant makes a good point Pete,” Madigan quickly interjected.

“Actually it is $660K in additional initial capital investment per line, plus about $40K a year in service for the higher profit potential line,” Pete responded with a smile.

“I told you so,” Torant said excitedly.

At this comment Pete put up a PowerPoint® slide that showed the resulting comparison:

Pete explained, “The average of 6 hours/week of increased uptime in our typical 3 shift operation results in the additional production of more than 22,000 units per line per year for the higher profit potential line.  Each line producing on average more than $340,000 more profit.”

“But that’s not as much as the additional $660K cost of the line,” Torant countered.

“The extra capital cost is included in the calculation,” Pete calmly replied.

“Well, Torant, that’s one you lost,” Mike Madigan said in a way that indicated that discussion on this point was finished.

Torant looked temporarily defeated, but he recovered quickly. “What about the solder paste? Ultima costs $0.02/gram less than the ElectroMaterials paste,” Torant challenged.

“That’s true,” said Patty. “But we have to stir it out of the jar for it to print well, and it has poor response to pause.”

Torant wouldn’t let her finish, “But that can’t make up for two cents per gram,” he snarled.

“Not true,” Patty snapped back. “Every time the line is down for a short time we have to wipe the first print because the transfer efficiency is so poor.  We lose an hour a week of production time.  In addition, when we are printing a lot, the paste shear thins and we have to replace it with fresh paste.  We actually pay more for the Ultima paste because we scrap so much.  However, the lost time is what hurts the most financially.”

“Only one hour per week!" Torant screamed. “I spend more time than that on smoke breaks. One hour per week can’t possibly make a big difference.”

Patty rolled her eyes and then displayed another slide that showed the profit comparison.

“This slide shows that by using the Ultima paste we lose over 3,700 units of production and over $140K of profit per year per line in that 1 hour hour per week.  One hour per week is 52 hours per year, let's not forget” Patty responded.

At this, Torant slammed his fist on the table, packed up his briefcase, and literally left the room in, well.... a torrent.

Patty, Pete, Madigan, and Sam just looked at each other.

“Well, maybe we won’t have to put up with him for awhile,” Pete said smiling.

“Nice work Patty and Pete", Madigan said. "Let’s develop an implementation plan phasing everything in you recommended as soon as is practical.”

Patty was always surprised when Madigan showed a little warmth by calling her and Pete by their first names.

“Sure thing, Mike,” she answered.  It was the first time she ever called him by his given name.

“Oh, and I guess it was a good thing we didn’t get around to discussing solder preforms,” Patty teased. "The ones Torant sells have too much flux and they gum up the pick & place nozzles.”

With that comment, they all chuckled and took it as a key that the meeting was over.

Cheers,

Dr. Ron

Eric Bastow recently wrote about using our Indalloy Flux #2 for soldering to Nitinol.  He did many tests and wrote an Application Note called Soldering to Nitinol.

Fort Wayne Metals, a leading supplier of medical wire (including Nitinol) also did a test on various fluxes as they relate to break load (maximum load before the joint breaks.

The fluxes tested included:

• Indalloy Flux #2 and Flux #3
• Indalloy Flux #5RMA; #5R; #5RA
• Indalloy Flux #4R
• Flux #400 (no longer commercially available)

The #5 series and the #4R were found to not be strong enough to clean off the tenacious oxides formed on Nitinol. Therefore, they didn't enable the solder to wet the surface properly.

Flux #2 and Flux#3 gave the best results (of the fluxes tested for break load) since they removed more of the oxides and allowed for a stronger solder bond.

Want to know more about soldering to this important medical material?  You can contact Eric Bastow directly at ebastow@indium.com or email us at medical@indium.com. 

Carol Gowans

cgowans@indium.com

Folks,

Let's look in on Patty and her colleagues......

Sam Watkins, ACME New Hampshire site GM, had just finished meeting with his boss, ACME CEO Mike Madigan. He was embarrassed that these meetings always stressed him; Mike was an intimidating character. Still, why should he be nervous? Things were going really well. Profits were up at all sites since NMAC/I/O was implemented as their new profitability metric. Patty Coleman, who suggested this metric, visited all of the ACME sites with weaker NMAC/I/O and profits, and, after performing process audits, helped these sites get their acts together. Oh, and we can’t forget Pete Ortiz, who works for Patty. They seemed to have a terrific synergistic relationship. He was an integral part of this success story.

Sam started writing an email to Patty. He and Mike concluded that, building on the recent NMAC/I/O success, they need to make ACME a “copy exactly” company. They agreed that if they were implementing a copy exactly strategy they should do it with the most cost effective assembly equipment and materials. It seemed to both of them that that the lowest “cost of ownership” should be the most important metric in this strategy. Sam finished his note to Patty asking (ordering) her to implement this strategy. She was to present a plan to achieve this goal to Sam and Mike in 6 weeks. Her presentation was to include the recommended equipment and materials, a phase-in plan, the budget needed to achieve the goal, and the projected ROI of the endeavor.

Patty was in her office having lunch while reading Golf Digest and USA Today. She looked up at her laptop screen and saw Sam's email. Reading it energized her. She was happiest when working on a significant project. After digesting the contents she thought she would call The Professor and ask his advice. Sam and Mike had insisted that she put The Professor on a retainer as he had added so much value to ACME. Patty had to chuckle, it was hard to get him to send in his bill; he seemed little motivated by money.

The Professor would never tell her how many languages he spoke, so she was going to try a little French on him.  She and Rob had been studying it at home.

“Bonjour Professeur, comment ca va?” Patty cheerfully said as The Professor answered the phone.

“Très bien Patty. Comment sont Rob et vos fils? Ma femme et moi avons été inquiets au sujet de Rob. Est-ce le dos guérit bien?” The Professor replied with a Parisian accent. (Very well Patty. How are Rob and your sons? My wife and I have been worried about Rob. Is his back healing well?)

Patty sighed and thought, “Well that makes about 10 languages I have verified so far.”

“Rob is doing quite well. Word got around and my Lean Six Sigma Green Belt instructor, Jim Hall called and shared his thoughts with me about over doing it in exercise programs. Jim is a fitness instructor and a big believer in moderate exercise. Rob has promised me to tone it down a lot,” Patty answered.

“I’m relieved,” said The Professor, “Rob needs to be healthy to keep up with your sons.”

“But, I imagine you have some business to discuss,” the Professor went right to the point.

“Yes, Sam and Mike want me to head up implementing a copy exactly program with equipment and materials, and they are strongly suggesting that the equipment and materials have the lowest cost of ownership,” Patty summarized.

“Copy exactly can be very beneficial, if the materials and equipment are good choices,” The Professor answered thoughtfully.

“But I have real problems with ‘Lowest Cost of Ownership.’ It is a good metric to compare something like automobiles, but to compare equipment or materials that are used to generate a profit it can be misused.” he replied.

Patty felt she understood where he was going, but wanted to hear it from him.

“Can you give an example?” she asked.

The Professor answered, “Let’s say a man mow lawns for a living. He considers two lawn mowers for his business, one is a push mower that cuts a 20 inch path and costs $300. Assume he takes 3 years to pay off the loan to buy it. Maintenance is $150 per year and fuel is $1200 for a 30 week season. The other is a sit down lawn mower that costs $3000, with $500 maintenance per year and it uses $3,000 in fuel per year. It cuts a 50 inch path. Which has the lower ‘Cost of Ownership?’”

“That’s easy,” Patty said, “the 20 inch push mower.” “But clearly the lowest cost of ownership is meaningless,” she went on.

“Explain,” replied the professor.

Patty answered, “Well, the man is in business to optimize profit. Clearly he can mow more laws with the sit down mower. Let’s say with the push mower he can do 4 lawns a day and with the sit down mower he can do 10 lawns a day. We can also assume he gets $35 per lawn. So, for a New Hampshire 30-week lawn mowing year, he earns 4x7x30x$35 = $29,400 with the push mower and 10x7x30x$35 = $73,500 with the sit down mower. Let me make a spreadsheet to determine the profit in each case.”

Patty was one of those young people who could type so fast that it made The Professor’s head spin. In seconds she had a spreadsheet developed.

“Wow, with the push mower he only makes $27,950 and with the riding mower he makes $69,000!” Patty exclaimed.

“And the same is true in electronics assembly. The best equipment, solder paste, solder preforms, underfill, cored solder wire, and solder fluxes are the ones that help your company make the most profit. Not the ones that have the ‘lowest cost of ownership,’” The Professor summed up.

Readers have asked how to visually assess a tabbing ribbon interconnection after a bond test.

This image is a cell that has been bond tested after soldering.

The first indication that you have a good bond is the physical resistance during the bond test. Even if you are peeling the ribbon off by hand, you will still notice if the ribbon jerks as it tears away from the cell. Fluctuation of bond strength may be caused by insufficient or inconsistent tabbing parameters, incomplete fluxing, or even contamination on the tabbing ribbon. If the resistance varies rapidly across the length of the bond, there could be an issue with microcracks. Microcracking of the underlying silicon is usually caused by built-up CTE (Coefficient of Thermal Expansion) stresses from tabbing. The ideal bond will peel apart where the tabbing ribbon meets the metallization, and it will be uniform. It should look like the image seen here.

There are some things you can do before, during, and after tabbing to get a better looking, and higher reliability, tabbing bond.

Before

Consider using alternative tabbing alloys and fluxes. Using Bi-based alloys at lower temperatures will lower the stresses caused by CTE mismatch and help eliminate microcracking. Softer tabbing ribbon can help keep stresses to a minimum as well.

During

Cell tabbing/stringing machines have many adjustable parameters. You owe it to your customers to explore the effects of parameter changes so you know you are building the best modules possible. (If I have time I’ll probably come to your facility to help – all you have to do is ask.)

After

Not everyone has time to wait, but if you have the luxury to let the tabbed cells sit for a day you should notice much better test results. Stresses built up in the silicon are partially relieved after 24-48 hours, which will result in less microcracking.

Let me know if I can help you make some beautiful cell interconnections!

~Jim (jhisert@indium.com)

With regard to soldering or wetting (coating) with indium, we are often asked to comment on the oxide formation of indium and how to remove it. We are also asked how long will it take for the oxide to reform on the surface. The procedure, below, will help you to better understand indium oxide, its removal, and how to handle it once it has been removed.

Indium is self-passivating. At room temperature, the oxide formation on the surface of the indium will be between 80-100 Angstroms thick.   Generally, this amount of oxide is not considered significant to hamper the wetting of the indium to a substrate, especially if a flux is used. Even if a flux is not used, the indium should not have any difficulty forming a joint or coating a surface.

If the application calls for an oxide-free joint and a flux cannot be used, the indium oxide can be easily removed following these steps:

·         Clean the indium in isopropyl alcohol or acetone to remove any surface organics. Allow to dry.

·         Etch the indium in 10% HCl for 1 minute to remove the surface oxides.

·         Rinse the indium in DI water to remove the acid.

·         Rinse the indium in isopropyl alcohol or acetone to remove the water.

·         Blow dry with dry nitrogen or allow to air dry.

While this etching procedure will remove the oxides, it has also opened up a whole new surface on the indium which will be prone to oxidation. Generally, the formation of oxide will begin on the surface of freshly etched indium as soon as it is exposed to air. At this time the thickness of the oxide layer is between 30-40 Angstroms. After 2-3 days of being exposed to air, the oxide has reached its passivating thickness of 80-100 Angstroms.

Note: 

Indium has the unique ability to cold weld to itself when the oxides have been removed. During the etching process, care must be taken to keep units of indium separated so they will not stick together. If they do stick, it is very difficult to separate them without distorting the indium.

If the etched indium is not going to be used immediately, storage in a nitrogen dry box is recommended . Alternatively, the etched indium can be submerged in clean acetone to prevent exposure to air.

FLUX:
To solder directly to stainless steel, Indalloy #2 Flux (activation range 100-371°C) must be used to remove the surface oxides, allowing a clean surface for the solder to wet. This flux is recommended for mechanical assembly joining only. Due to the corrosiveness, it is not recommend for electrical applications because, if the post reflow flux residue is not thoroughly removed using warm water with mechanical scrubbing, the joint will be compromised due to the potential for corrosion during its life. An alternate solution would be to nickel plate the stainless steel, so a weaker flux (RA, ROL1) can be used that is less corrosive and can be easily removed with an appropriate solvent.   

Another alternate solution is to use a forming gas consisting of nitrogen and hydrogen. This method of oxide removal is generally used when the soldering temperature can be above 350°C which is ideal for activating the hydrogen to reduce the oxides. With this method, there is no post-reflow flux residue to clean up.

SOLDER:
The solders usually recommended for stainless steel joining applications contain a considerable amount of tin; however, the actual solder choice has to fit the temperature range of the application. Generally, a low-temperature application may require Indalloy #1E (52In,48Sn) - 118°C (eutectic), while Indalloy #182 (80Au,20Sn)- 280°C (also eutectic) is a great solder choice for high temperature. If you are looking for a solder in the moderate range of temperatures, Indalloy #121 (96.5Sn, 3.5Ag); 221°C (eutectic) is an excellent choice as well as any of the SAC alloys in the same temperature range. There are also many other solders to choose from that will work equally as well. Please see our solder alloy physical properties chart or consult our Applications Engineering staff at Indium Corporation.

We are frequently asked if it is possible to solder to aluminum. The answer is yes, if the following guidelines are followed: 

FLUXES:
Because it is difficult to solder to aluminum, Indium Corporation developed Indalloy Flux #3 (activation temperature is 96-343°C) to remove the tenacious oxides that prevent the solder from wetting to the surface. This flux is very corrosive and is not recommended for electronic applications because, if any of the post-reflow flux residue remains after a warm water rinse with mechanical scrubbing, the joint may be compromised. This flux is recommended for mechanical assembly joining applications only. 

Another alternate solution is to use a forming gas consisting of nitrogen and hydrogen. This method of oxide removal is generally used when the soldering temperature is greater than 350°C which is ideal for activating the hydrogen to reduce the oxides. With this method, there is no post-reflow flux residue to clean up.

METALLIZATIONS:
An alternate to corrosive fluxes is to nickel plate the aluminum so a weaker flux (RA, ROL1) can be used. These fluxes are less corrosive and can be easily removed with an appropriate solvent.   There are many solder alloys that will wet to nickel. Check out our solder alloy physical properties table.

SOLDER ALLOYS:
The solders that are normally recommended for joining aluminum are:

• Indalloy #201 (91Sn, 9Zn); 199°C E
• Indalloy #176 (95Zn, 5Al); 382°C E. 

After the report by Isofoton regarding reliability testing of Bi-based alloys for tabbing ribbon, the world learned that Bi-based alloys could survive the lamination process and function in use. If you haven’t seen it yet, I consider this mandatory reading! Here is the info: B. Lalaguna, P.Sanchez-Friera, I.J. Bennett, L.J. Caballero, J. Alonso, “Evaluation of Bismuth-Based Solder Alloys for Low-Stress Interconnection of Industrial Crystalline Silicon PV Cells", 22^nd EU PVSEC, Milan, 2007Milan, 2007.

We all know the Bi based alloys like 57Bi/42Sn/1Ag and 58Bi/42Sn can be used in a standard module assembly process, but is there an advantage to using Bi/Sn or Bi/Sn/Ag when Sn/Pb and Sn/Pb/Ag alloys are so well known and trusted in the industry?

I’ll give you 3 benefits:

1)    1) Bi/Sn/Ag and Bi/Sn are Pb-Free

2)    2) Bi/Sn/Ag and Bi/Sn are low-temperature alloys, they allow you to lower your tabbing process temperatures

3)    3) When paired with the correct flux and metallization, these Bi alloys form a powerful bond without microcracks (due to the lower process temperature)

Below are results with SunTab^TM ribbon assembled on a Komax X series stringer and tested on a XYZTEC Condor 150-3 bond tester (provided by the respective companies).

You’ll probably notice the lack of y-axis scale – I’m not going to give away all the cool information that easily! Contact me at jhisert@indium.com to learn more.

Folks,

I’m taking a few moments from Wassail Weekend , held annually in my village, Woodstock VT, “The prettiest small town in America”, to write a post about last week’s workshops at ACI.

Indium colleague Ed Briggs and I gave a 3 hour presentation on “Lead-Free Assembly for High Yields and Reliability.” I think Ed’s analysis of “graping” and the “head-in-pillow” defect is the best around. 

There was quite a bit of discussion on the challenges faced by solder paste flux in the new world of lead-free solder paste and miniaturized components (i.e. very small solder paste deposits.) One of the hottest topics was nitrogen and lead-free SMT assembly. There seemed to be uniform agreement that solder paste users should be able to demand that their lead-free solder paste perform well with any PWB pad finish (e.g. OSP Immersion silver, electroless nickel gold, etc.) without the use of nitrogen. Not only does using nitrogen cost money, but it will usually make tombstoning worse. However, in the opinion of most people, nitrogen is a must for wave soldering and, since it minimizes dross development, it likely pays for itself.

After Ed and I finished, Fred Dimock, of BTU, gave one of the best talks I have ever experienced on reflow soldering. He discussed thermal profiling in detail, including the importance of assuring that thermocouples are not oxidized (when oxidized they lose accuracy). He also discussed a reflow oven design that minimizes temperature overshoot during heating, and undershoot when the heater is off. Understanding these topics is critical with the tight temperature control that many lead-free assemblers face.

Fred Verdi of ACI finished the meeting with an excellent presentation on “Pb-free Electronics for Aerospace and Defense.” Fred’s talk discussed the work that went into the “Manhattan Project.” A free download of the entire project report is available.

There appears to be agreement that acceptable lead-free reliability has been established for consumer products with lifetimes of 5 years or so, but not for military/aerospace electronics where lifetimes can be up to 40 years in harsh service conditions. These vast product lifetime and consequences of failure differences are depicted in the Fred's chart (above). Commercial products are in quadrant A and military/aerospace products in quadrant D.

One of the greatest risks faced by quadrant D products is tin whiskers. Fred spent quite a bit of time discussing this interesting phenomenon. One of the challenges of this risk is that there is no way to accelerate it, so you can’t do an equivalent test to accelerated thermal cycling or drop shock. Fred mentioned that there have now been verified tin whisker fails, the Toyota accelerator mechanism being a confirmed one.

In addition to tin whiskers, lead-free reliability for quadrant D products (with a service life of up to 40 years) in thermal cycle and other areas remains a concern.  I mention that tin pest was not on the list of issues for this quadrant.

Fred and the Manhattan Project Team have identified many "gaps" that need to be addressed to determine and mitigate the risk of lead-free assembly for quadrant D products.  They plan to start this approximately $100M program in 2013.

For those that missed this free workshop, ACI host Mike Prestoy is planning another one in 6 months.

Cheers,

Dr. Ron

Tombstoning

• the transition to Pb-Free (higher reflow temperatures, and related flux issues)
• miniaturization (0201s and 01005s)

• The reflow oven operator can slow down the ramp rate. A slower ramp rate allows for more uniform warming of the PCBA.
• Another technique is to employ a "soak" just below the melting temperature (solidus) of the alloy. For example, for a SAC305 profile (217°C solidus), one may implement a "soak" at 205 to 210°C for 30 to 120 seconds. This allows for the cooler parts of the PCBA to "catch up" to the warmer parts. After thermal equilibrium has been achieved, one can spike the temperature up to the appropriate peak temperature (i.e. 245°C). This technique (depicted in the reflow profile shown at the right) allows for all of the solder paste deposits to melt and wet the component terminations at roughly the same time; thereby, mitigating tombstoning.

Phone: +1.315.853.4900
E-mail: ebastow@indium.com

Here is a list of tricks to help you overcome the issues that can arise while hand soldering silicon-based solar cells (and other applications as well). Some of these ideas are obvious for most, but all the suggestions can help you form a better solder joint - and build a better final product:

1)    Use the correct soldering tip. I’ve made the mistake of using an inappropriate solder tip before, and so have many of my customers. It’s a frustrating problem you will only let happen to you once: everything is set up perfectly but nothing will melt, until you notice the solder tip is not the correct size or shape. This has happened to many of my customers who were initially using cone point soldering tips when they were working with 2mm wide solder coated tabbing ribbon. Simply changing the tip to a 2mm wide chisel point made all the difference, and promoted soldering readily. Why such a big difference in performance? The chisel tip allows heat to flow across the ribbon, instead of only heating a single point. More heat flow = more heat in your solder joint.

2)    Pre-tin the soldering iron. Just as an appropriately sized soldering tip will distribute heat across the soldering surface, a bit of molten alloy can help create a thermal interface to maximize heat transfer. Remember to melt a small amount of solder onto the tip of your iron before soldering, and be sure it’s the same alloy you are soldering with. (Leave the custom alloying to us ;)

3)    Consider the alloy you are soldering. All the heat your typical soldering iron can produce will not be enough to melt some of the highest temperature alloys. Be sure to have a good understanding of the alloy you have selected. In some cases with low-temperature alloys (like bismuth or indium alloys), excessive soldering temperature can de-wet the alloy and char low temperature fluxes.

4)    Use the correct flux. Fluxes are quite different, I’ve spent my entire soldering career trying to get that point across. There are fluxes for high temperatures or low temperatures, cleaning with water or not cleaning at all. There are specialty fluxes for specialty alloys and there are fluxes for different soldering surfaces. Use the correct flux. If you don’t know what the best flux for the application is - just ask; that’s what I am here for.

5)    Use a bottom side heater. Silicon is known to pull heat away – that c-Si solar cell that needs to be soldered is a heatsink! Some solder equipment vendors also provide underside heating pads to help prevent excessive heat loss.

6)    Keep your soldering iron clean. That black crud that builds up on your soldering iron tip, it’s not helping you form a good solder joint. Those oxides and charred flux residues can easily be removed by wiping the hot iron across the wet sponge (that should be at your soldering station). A clean tip will lead to better heat transfer, and it will make the fluxes you use more effective.

This is the soldering station I use, it’s a PS-900 supplied by OK International. Just about any soldering iron will work, but they won’t all work as well – or come with as good support.

I’m still learning all the tricks to hand soldering, so feel free to share any you have learned over the years!

~Jim

Folks,

The Guadalajara (GDL), MX Chapter of the SMTA held their first meeting on November 9 and 10 at CETI in GDL.
Approximately 70 engineers from local companies attended. It was a great success. 

The agenda was:

November 9^th, 2011

0830-0900am    Registration and Exhibits Open

0900-0915am    Welcoming Remarks and Exhibition starts

0915-1045am    Inventec: “Reliability Assessment regarding Flux residues"

1045-1215pm    Sanmina-SCI: “Capabilities of a Failure Analysis Lab”

1215-1315pm    LUNCH

1315-1445pm    DEK: "Optimizing the Print Process for Mixed Technology"

1445 -1615pm   Vitronics Soltec: “How to Choose a Robust Configuration for Equipment
                          for Defect Free Soldering - Reflow, Wave and Selective”

1615-1745pm    KIC: “Fixing Reflow and Wave Related Defects as Well as How to Avoid 
                          Them in the First Place”

 November 10^th, 2011

0900-1030am    Sanmina-SCI: “Process development of 01005 components”

1030-1200pm    Indium: "Lead-Free Assembly for High Yields and Reliability."

1200-1300pm    LUNCH

1300-1430pm    Universal Instruments: "Tutorial on Failure Analysis"

1430-1600pm    Zestron: “PCB cleaning before conformal coating”

1600-1730pm    Kester: “Understanding Soldering Chemistries - Reducing Costly
                          Defects, Increasing Yields and Reliability.

I spoke on “Lead-Free Assembly for High Yields and Reliability." We had several raffles and gave away autographed copies of my book “The Adventures of Patty and the Professor,” which has just recently been formally published. 

As usual, I had dinner at Santo Coyote, one of my favorite restaurants, however my Mexican friends also took me to Sacromonte, claiming it had better food. They were correct. I was convinced to try chicken mole which I liked. It is tough to beat Santo Coyote’s ambiance, however.

I can’t cite data for this, but I am quite sure that GDL has the largest number of workers in electronics assembly outside of Asia. It is great news that they now have an SMTA chapter to help the local engineers network and continue to grow in their skills.  It was great to play a small part in this success, but most of the credit must go to Indium Corporation’s Ivan Castellanos who is chapter president and Kester’s Miguel Vazquez, chapter vice president.

Cheers,

Dr. Ron

Following on from our discussions of last time...

As you will recall from the previous post on this topic, My friend and colleague Chris Nash and I were discussing some puzzling results for low dip height found during testing of package-on-package (PoP) materials. The findings will be of interest to everyone who uses a dipping process in both SMT and flip-chip assembly.

Post II:
For greater solder paste and flux dipping heights it appears as though a linear doctor blade (back and forth) used in a dipping process running at high speed will allow dip heights close to those expected from the theoretical engineered limit, for 50 microns and greater dip height. The high speed shear-thins the flux, which has the effect of both reducing the thickness of the boundary layer, and also has the benefit of reducing the extensional (tack) viscosity, so components can be more easily released from the dip tray.

What if you want to go to lower dip depths?

As we move into the area of copper pillar flip-chip dipping, and even (we hear) some Japanese customers doing package-on-package assembly, the dip height (dip depth) can go down to as low as 10-20microns, and this where we are hearing that rotary dip trays are coming into their own. The diagram below shows a simplified version of a flux and solder paste dipping tray.


Rotary dip trays seem to have the following advantages:

- Height Setting: The dip height/depth is set using two micrometers, so is infinitely adjustable to a precise setting, although the dip height does have to be measured.

- Low Cost: They also add zero capital cost for a new dip depth setting, compared to specially-engineered dipping trays, which can be upwards of $2,000 each.

- Accuracy and Precision of Depth: From a more pragmatic viewpoint, however, the real reason for rotary trays being used with ultra-low dip heights is that the flux depth is actually measured: there is no tacit assumption of a given dip depth being correct and constant, based on the engineering of the dipping tray. As we saw last time, an error of 20 microns is possible, and with a dip height of 50 microns or less, this is a huge problem if you are using a 50 micron dip tray and assuming that you are getting exactly that dip depth.

However, rotary dip trays also have their share of potential problems compared to linear dipping systems: 

 - Larger Surface Area: Flux and solder paste may dry out faster, and a water soluble material will be more vulnerable to the humidity content of the air. It is also more wasteful of flux, since a larger surface area of flux is exposed than will ever be used, although this may also be true of some of the linear tray designs.
 
- Circular Tray: Materials will experience a higher shear rate at the outer edge than in the middle. If spun too fast, dipping materials may accumulate at the edges, thrown outwards by centripetal force.

- Lower Shear Rate: For the same flux or solder paste dip depth, the velocity of the doctor blade will be much lower with a rotary than a linear system. However, as you can see from the illustration below, for a doctor blade moving at 1/4 the speed and 1/4 the dip height, the shear rate is the same.

As always, please contact me if you need to learn any more.

Cheers!  Andy

Folks,

Rob heads to Guadalajara to solve the QFN voiding problem......

As Rob sat on the airplane, he was excited to go to GDL (Guadalajara, Mexico) to help solve the voiding problem. He knew Patty would be a little peeved that he asked for Pete to come along, but she was gracious, recognizing that Rob would benefit from a success in this effort.

As the plane circled for a landing, Rob was preparing for the somewhat comical trip through customs. He always thought that the red light/green light method of determining if they were going to search you bags was unusual. Oh well, go with the flow.

The ride from the airport was about 40 kilometers to the factory through GDL’s bustling traffic. After arriving at the plant Rob was relieved to see that Miguel Mendoza was there to meet him and Pete. Rob had worked with Miguel in the past and respected him as a process engineer. Miguel told them that a kick-off meeting was scheduled with the site GM, a fellow from the US named Grant Wilson.

As the meeting started, Rob introduced himself to Wilson in Spanish.

“Wow,” Wilson chuckled, “when asked if I am bilingual, trilingual or American, I have to say I am American.” “But, I am taking Spanish lessons,” he continued.

Rob looked at Miguel and saw him roll his eyes. But Rob thought it was at least a nice gesture that Wilson was taking Spanish lessons.

“Perhaps someone could share what actions have been taken and what the status is,” Rob suggested.

“Miguel, could you give Rob an overview of where we are” Wilson asked.

Miguel began, “The warranty send back rate is 5% on Druid phones. Almost all of these failures have been traced to high powered QFNs that have significant voiding under the thermal pad. The voiding percentage is about 50-70%. About a week ago we obtained Derrick Herron, Dr Yan Liu and Dr Ning-Cheng Lee’s recent paper, Voiding Control at QFN Assembly, at SMTAI 2011.  We changed our stencil design, as suggested in the paper, to allow for venting of the solder paste volatiles and voiding went down to 30 to 50%.”

“What level of voiding would be acceptable?” Rob asked.

“We’re not sure,” Miguel answered.

“So it seems we have two issues, one is to determine if 30 to 50% voiding is OK and the other is to see if we can reduce it further,” Grant Wilson reasonably commented.

“My sense is that we need to be in the less than 30% range,” Rob added. “This may require that we use solder preforms. Voiding is caused by outgassing but also by insufficient solder,” Rob finished.

“OK, you two go and solve the problem and get back to me. You have 3 days,” Wilson commanded.

Rob, Pete, and Miguel headed off to get started on their assignment. Rob was really glad Pete was there.  He was an expert in setting up and optimizing the component placement machines that were at this site.  Fortunately, Rob had also brought some solder preforms with him, expecting that they would be required. A call to the QFN vendor confirmed that less than 30% voiding should be the target. Rob looked at the data and x-ray images of the work that Miguel and his team did to reduce the voiding by improving the venting of the flux volatiles. He was impressed. But he didn’t think it would be enough.

(Dialogue translated from Spanish)

“Miguel, I’m almost certain that we will need to use solder preforms on the two most critical QFNs,” Rob began. “There are two major reasons for voiding, the first is flux volatiles forming voids, the second is solder starvation. Most people don’t realize that solder paste is only 50% by volume metal. In cases like this, where we really need low voiding, often the only path to success is to use solder preforms to add solder metal,” he finished.

Rob then showed Miguel Seth Homer’s SMTAI 2011 paper Minimizing Voiding in QFN Packages Using Solder Preforms. This paper describes the process steps needed to achieve a successful QFN solder preform process. Rob and Miguel spent the better part of a day setting up one assembly line to assemble with the solder preforms using this paper as a guide. They assembled 100 phones and the voiding level was 10.5%.

Early the next morning, they met with Grant Wilson.

“By the smiles on both of your faces, I gather you were successful?” Wilson asked.

Rob went on to explain how they determined that solder preforms were needed. He explained the process and waited for questions.

“What do solder preforms cost?” Grant asked.

“They are about $0.02 (US) in quantity, but understand that your warranty cost per $200 phone is at least $10 right now (0.05x200),” Rob answered.

“Did you have to slow the process done?” Wilson asked. “I have been a fan of the work that you and Patty Coleman have done with The Professor, you have convinced me of the importance of throughput,” he finished.

“The Professor has pointed out that almost never is a line completely balanced. Your flexible placers were waiting four seconds for the chip shooters. We put the preforms on the flexible placer and tuned up both machines by optimizing the feeder placement. The cycle time is now 1.25 seconds faster for the 3 phone per PCB card,” Rob answered.

“I’m curious, what was the greatest challenge?” Grant asked.

“Rob pointed out that the correct placement of the preform on the solder paste deposit for the heat sink part of the QFN is critical. We needed to assure that the preform was pushed into the paste far enough to leave a ring of paste around the preform to assure good mating with the QFN.  We couldn't have done this without Pete, he really knows the placement machines,” Miguel answered.

Miguel then showed Wilson an image from Seth Homer’s paper that displays this situation .

“Guys thanks for the great work. I have to admit that I didn’t really know anything about solder preforms, before today. In certain cases it is obvious that they can be lifesavers!” Grant summed up the situation.

“To celebrate your success, I’m treating for dinner tonight at the Santo Coyote, let’s meet there at 7PM,” Wilson suggested.

“Thanks,” Rob, Pete, and Miguel said in unison.

Santo Coyote was Rob’s favorite restaurant in Guadalajara, but it was Patty’s too. Rob was a little sad she couldn’t join them.

 Epilogue: Three months later it was confirmed that warranty send back rate was approaching zero.  Miguel was promoted to senior engineer for his part in the solution to this costly problem.

Cheers,

Dr. Ron

最近越来越多的客户都在询问Indium Flux #2，其中有不少是制造医疗产品的客户。我自己对Indium Flux #2其实也是一知半解的，就借此机会学习了解了一下。

Indium Flux #2是一种强酸性的液体状助焊剂，激发其活性的温度范围是100-371⁰C。 其最显著的特点是能够使用在不锈钢的焊接上(soldering to stainless steel)，而且和很多合金都兼容。因为这是强酸性的助焊剂，在焊接完毕后都应该有温水洗干净或是擦干净它的残留物，不然会造成腐蚀。

在医疗焊接上，可以用Indium Flux #2焊接Nitinol(用在可移植性器械上，implantable devices)。常用的和Nitinol焊接的合金有Indalloy 121 (Sn96.5Ag3.5, melts at 221C) 和 Indalloy 182 (80Au20Sn, melts at 280C);也常有客户用Indium Flux #2把Nitinol 和不锈钢焊接在一起。Indium Flux #2可以有效去除焊接表面的硬厚的氧化物，两个焊接面能更好的被清洁，焊接润湿性更好。

Cheers,