No Lead Solder

Folks,

Pity the copper age smelter of 3000BC.  He had to get his wood fire to 1085°C to smelt or melt copper, sometimes he couldn’t get that high a temperature.  Even when he was successful, his copper didn’t flow well and was soft. 

But the winds of change were occurring about that time, news of tin was in the air.  When tin is mixed with about 90% copper, the melting temperature of the resulting bronze plummets to 850°C, this temperature drop, of over 200°C, is a big deal.  Not only did the lower temperature make it easier to melt the bronze, the bronze would flow better in molds.  In addition, the strength and hardness of bronze is many times that of copper.  From the figure above, you can see that a 10% addition of tin to copper produces a bronze that has 3 times the yield strength.  The Bronze Age had begun. Can you imagine the joy of the early metal smiths as they transitioned from copper to bronze, not only was bronze harder and stronger, but it was much easier to process and required less precious wood in the furnaces.  On the downside, tin was then, and still is, rarer than copper, so the cost of bronze is higher than copper alone.  Poor man’s bronze is brass (copper and zinc).  Since zinc is cheaper than copper, brass is less expensive, but from the chart (left), the materials properties are typically weaker than bronze.

Because of its greater strength and hardness, bronze was an important material for war.  If you had equal fighting ability to your enemy and he had a bronze sword and shield to your copper weapons you would lose every time.  So bronze smelting and manufacturing was likely an early military secret.

An equally important benefit of tin, is that when tin was alloyed with lead, a very low melting material was created that would bond to bronze and other metals.  Soldering  was invented.  Those of us that use solder everyday often don’t recognize the miracle of soldering.  When we solder electronic components to a PWB we are essentially bonding copper to copper (which melts at 1085°C) at a temperature of less than 250°C.  We do this metallurgical bonding in the presence of thermally delicate plastic.  So without solder, we would not have the electronics industry as it is exists today.

Tin does all of the “work” in soldering.  It is tin that forms the intermetallics Cu₆Sn₅ and Cu₃Sn with copper. The other solder alloying elements such as lead, silver, and copper play important roles in wetting, spreading, and the ultimate strength of the bond, but only tin metallurgically interacts with the copper.

So when you pick up your mobile phone, type on your computer, or watch TV today, remember - without the “Miracle of Soldering” you wouldn’t be able to!

Cheers,

Dr. Ron

The Image is from Askeland's The Science and Engineering of Materials.

Folks,

Some time ago I wrote a post, “In Search of Tin Whiskers,”  Michael responds below.  He makes some good points.

Dr. Ron, I'm responding to your  blog regarding tin whiskers. I actually have a failure analysis report I did a couple of years ago in which failure of our product was due to this issue and occurred on a part that came into RoHS compliance only 3 months prior.
 

I'm not sure that your question of identifying whisker issues in product that proper steps have been taken to mitigate the problem is a constructive one. The fact is that many of the component manufacturers from overseas jumped into compliance without any thought or regard to this issue thereby flooding the industry with components such as plagued my company. We have not had this issue since we've specified an alternate finish.

These whiskers are so delicate that most problems disappear when the technician starts to work on the failed unit and the problem never re-appears so it is written off as an anomaly, loose/bad connection and not investigated any further. It was only my own curiosity as to the number of "no problem found" failures of our keypads we had suddenly encountered that caused me to dig deeper and when I looked into the connector I was amazed at the crystal city staring back at me. I couldn't believe what I was seeing after all of these years.

After seeing this problem first hand I became, and am, quite convinced that there were and are people who will be losing life, limb, and property because this forced compliance with its risk was not given proper worldwide attention.

Michael.

A popular topic Re my blog is solder density calculations. Rhonda writes……

Hi Dr. Lasky,
I am a precious metals recycler and would very much appreciate your verifying the validity of an equation that approximates the Karat Value of various alloys of gold based on S.G. which I will call density or "D," and the Karat Value is "K." The equation is seems to hold relatively true even when the exact composition of the alloy is unknown, although the percent of error obviously will increase as density decreases. I would also appreciate not only verification but also more specific information on percent of error for densities below about 14 or 15 g/cc. Here is the equation:

K = 0.0089D^3 - 0.550D^2 + 12.5299D - 77.06

Thank you so much for whatever assistance you can provide.

Rhonda

These types of equations can only work for one alloying metal with the gold.  This one is only for copper.  It is also calibrated in Rhonda’s favor as it reads the karat level about 10% low.   I was able to determine this by using the Excel Solder Density worksheet that I developed. If the alloy was gold and lead, a 50% by weight gold (12 karat) would show as 15.7 karat with this equation and Rhonda would lose her shirt.

In response to my blog post on copper as the precursor to civilization, Harvey writes about pollution from early mining operations…..

Also interesting, early copper mining and processing led to the first examples of human induced environmental damage. There are documented sites in the Alps where copper processing by prehistoric peoples has left areas treeless to this day, due to heavy metal contamination.

Harvey

Mining and smelting were very tough businesses in ancient days.  In addition to pollution, many workers died from toxic fumes.

Dr. Ron

I was recently asked to gather some data comparing Indium Corporation’s tabbing fluxes and our largest competitor’s leading tabbing fluxes. Using a new method of solder spread testing found in an upcoming issue of Global Solar Technology, two Indium Corporation tabbing fluxes were directly compared to three of the leading competitor’s fluxes.

The test consists of these simple steps:

• Apply flux to cell
• Dry flux on cell
• Apply solder preforms on cell metallization
• Reflow on a hotplate
• Measure solder length

Finally, the measurements are plugged into the equation:

S = (L_f/L_i)100-100

                   Where:         S = Increase in preform length

                                      L_f= Final solder length

L_i= Initial length of preform

In the end, the Indium Corporation tabbing fluxes (GS-3434 and GS-5454) both caused the solder to spread ~44% further on a given cell – compared to only 13%, 15%, and 16% for the competitors' fluxes.

If you’d like to learn more about the test method or the results, or want help conducting your own evaluation, send me an email at solar@indium.com.

Do you ever have a need for a "low temperature" solder (meaning an alloy that melts at less than 175C)?

You may have delicate components that cannot withstand standard reflow temperatures, or maybe you are looking to reduce costs by lowering the reflow temperature, or you may be step soldering.  Whatever your reason, there are two unique metals that are used extensively in low temperature solder alloys.

The first one I am sure you can guess: Indium.  The other one is Bismuth. While these two elements are used extensively in the over 100 alloys available in the 50C to 175C range, they couldn't be more different from each other.

Indium is a very soft, malleable metal and remains so even at cryogenic temperatures. It melts at 156C.  Bismuth, on the other hand, is very brittle, even at room temperature, and melts at 271C.  But both lend themselves very nicely to solder alloys that melt below 175C.

Let's look at the two most common alloys in these families.

The two alloys:

• 52In 48Sn (Indalloy #1E) Melts at 118C
• 58Bi 42Sn (Indalloy #281) Melts at 138C

What they have in common are:

• Both are lead-free
• Both are tin-based
• Both are eutectic (liquidus and solidus temperatures are the same, with no plastic range)
• Both can be made into a wide variety of solder forms and can be used in low temperature applications

But the indium-based alloy will give you better compensation of coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) mismatch than the bismuth alloy.  The bismuth alloy has greater tensile strength but has a lower shear strength than the indium alloy and is generally not recommended in applications where the product has potential to be dropped (like cell phones).  The indium alloy will give you greater thermal conductivity than the bismuth, as well.  The bismuth will give you a cost advantage.

So, which alloy do you use?  Well, that depends on the metallizations you are working with and the environment in which your final product will be operating. For example, if you are soldering to two different surfaces that expand at different rates, then you will want to go with the indium alloy - to keep your solder joints from cracking.  But, there are a lot more considerations when choosing a low temperature solder, and we can help you sort through them.  Check out our Low Temperature Solder page on the web or contact us at AskUs@indium.com or contact me directly at cgowans@indium.com and we can answer your questions or put you in touch with one of our local experts to review your entire process for the best solution.

Let us help!

Carol Gowans

Maria Durham, Indium’s new Technical Specialist in Semiconductor and Advanced Assembly Materials, has been doing some research on indium lead (In/Pb) solder alloys. We chatted about her findings this week. 

 [Andy C. Mackie: ACM] Which indium/lead solder alloys are most common, and what are their properties?

[Maria Durham: MD] Firstly, the use of lead-(Pb-)containing solders in some soldering applications is restricted due to local environmental and RoHS compliance, but there are still many applications where they are  allowed. Many military, aerospace, and industrial equipment uses, as well as many applications related to vehicles, are exempt. The table below shows the most common indium/lead (In/Pb) alloys (pink) and their properties, sorted by liquidus temperature; the higher of the two melting points (solidus and liquidus) seen for non-eutectic alloys. In blue are three comparison materials.

Indalloy 205 is the most commonly used, probably because it has the closest liquidus temperature to the tin/lead eutectic (183°C), 63Sn/37Pb (Indalloy 106). This means it can be reflowed using a standard Sn/Pb eutectic profile. The next most common alloys that are used are Indalloy7, 204, and 206.  Besides the melting range, indium has comparable thermal and electrical conductivity to standard materials.

[ACM] What makes indium-lead (In/Pb) solders so attractive, and why have we seen a recent resurgence in their usage?

 [MD] One main attraction to using indium/lead (In/Pb) solder alloys in soldering to precious metal surfaces is that, unlike tin-containing solders, they do not leach gold. That is, gold does not dissolve in them to any appreciable extent. During discussions at Semicon West in 2011, one of our California customers reported going through 8 simulated reflows with Indalloy 205 in contact with a gold surface with no loss of joint strength and no joint embrittlement. That is pretty impressive. Note that embrittlement is often caused by gold-intermetallic formation. It has been noted that even at 250°C, 50In/50Pb dissolves Au at a rate 13 times slower than it does into 63Sn/37Pb, although this, of course, is a kinetic, not a solubility limit, study.

The higher melting Indalloy 164 (92.5Pb/5In/2.5Ag) has the lowest coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of all of the In/Pb solders and is able to withstand the higher temperature excursions that can be seen in step-soldering type applications (where a very high melting solder is used to form the first joint, followed by a next lowest melting alloy, and so on). This is seen in applications such as power electronics assembly, where the first step solder is often used for die-attach either as a solder paste, wire, or preform. The high melting point helps the solder withstand the operational temperatures associated with under-the-hood electronics, in applications such as engine control modules, where Indalloy 151 (92.5Pb/5Sn/2.5Ag) or Indalloy 163 (95.5Pb/2Sn/2.5Ag) are most commonly used. In/Pb solder is excellent on very rigid structures such as ceramic-to-metal or ceramic-to-ceramic. The desired solidus / liquidus temperature range can be adjusted by changing the indium:lead ratio, making it very easy to “dial in” the alloy to a specific reflow process.

Another attraction to using In/Pb solders is that they exhibit good fatigue resistance in thermal cycling from -55°C to 125°C.  In testing, the 50In50Pb solder joint fatigue life is about 100 times greater than that for 63Sn/37Pb.

 [ACM] What fluxes are used in these applications, and how are they formulated differently?

 [MD] The fluxes most compatible with the lower melting point (<200°C) indium-containing solders are NC-SMQ-80 (solder paste) or the lower-tack TacFlux® 012 (suitable for use with wire, preforms, and spheres). These are no-clean fluxes, specifically formulated for lower temperature reflow.  Under appropriate low temperature reflow these fluxes leave behind benign residues that do not need to be cleaned off (“no-clean” flux), although they are often cleaned off in most practical applications, usually to ensure reliable wirebonds absent of flux spatter.

 To learn more, please contact us.

 Cheers!  Andy

Reducing the surface oxides of Nitinol is just the first step in getting a good solder joint with this versatile medical assembly material.

Next you have to choose the right solder alloy.  You will probably want to stay away from anything containing lead, cadmium, or antimony, particularly in medical applications.  And you will want something with a high tensile strength.

The best choice is Indalloy #121 (96.5Sn 3.5Ag).  It has a tensile strength of 5,620 PSI and a melting temperature of 221C and is obviously lead-free.  It wets well to the cleaned Nitinol.

If you need a higher melting temperature solder (one that can withstand autoclave temperatures for example) you should consider Indalloy #182 (80Au 20Sn) which melts at 280C, has a tensile strength of 40,000 PSI, and has long been considered a highly reliable solder.  Additionally, this alloy is available in very fine diameter solder wires to minimize waste.

Soldering temperatures should be 25C to 50C above the liquidus temperature of whichever solder you use and proper cleaning should be always be performed afterwards.

Contact us at medical@indium.com for more information about soldering for medical devices or visit our web site at www.indium.com/medical

Carol

I recently had a chance to catch up with a friend and colleague, Jasbir Bath. If you’ve spent time in the electronics assembly industry you have most likely met him, heard of him, or used an industry standard that he has helped create. Jasbir is a founding member of The Solar Engineering & Manufacturing Association,  SEMA. Who better to talk to about a new association than a founding member?

Jim: The Solar Engineering and Manufacturing Association (SEMA) is a relatively new association for engineers in the solar industry. Can you tell me a little about why it was created?

Jasbir: It was created about 2 years ago based on a need by the solar engineering/manufacturing base to address issues in the industry. There are many organizations in the solar industry but none are wholly dedicated to the engineering/manufacturing profession. SEMA was formed to address this need. We are working to address a number of gaps in the industry highlighted by the SEMA membership which include Education, Training, Standards, Reliability, Cost Reduction and Technology Gaps.

SEMA is a group of engineers, manufacturers and related professionals in the solar manufacturing and related disciplines who volunteer to conduct activities in the organization. The projects/programs we work on are driven by the active involvement of the membership.

Further details on SEMA and what we do can be found on the SEMA website at www.solar-ema.org

Our membership costs are low as we are not an organization looking to make a profit but to encourage participation and work to advance the solar industry as well as advancing education, training and collaboration within the solar manufacturing industries.

Jim: I heard there’s a new solar conference coming up? Can you tell me what makes this one different than all the other solar conferences we go to throughout the year?

Jasbir:  SEMA is collaborating with SMTA (Surface Mount Technology Association) to develop a conference meant for engineers and managers in the field to look at the areas of concern in the industry and develop ways to address them. We don’t see a similar conference to this which covers such a broad range of subjects which is specifically focused to address the needs of the industry. The program will consist of presentations and discussion covering the reliability testing of PV Modules covering gaps and where future work needs to be done. It will highlight various reliability programs being done in the industry with an assessment of current and evolving standards in manufacturing and reliability.

We are pleased to have a great line up of speakers and presentations. SEMA will present its reliability report assessing the reliability of PV modules at the conference. We will also have speakers from UL, IPC and NREL to discuss international solar standards together with a discussion of the work of the PV QA Task Force forum from leaders in that Task Force group. Areas covered will include temperature, humidity, voltage, mechanical and UV testing of PV modules and diode testing.

We will also have presentations on the reliability of microinverters/inverters and future trends from organizations including Sandia. PV Manufacturing Issues will be discussed by companies including Flextronics. The Global Solar Outlook will be reviewed by companies including Navigant, Custer Consulting and Prismark. Finally we will review general PV Module hazardous issues such as Electrical and Fire Concerns and well as Module Warranty/ Traceability Issues.

In addition we have industry leading training courses at the event on PV Module Manufacturing and Troubleshooting and PV Standards in addition to exhibitions.

The SEMA/SMTA Conference, Training Courses and Exhibition are from March 21^st to 23^rd at the Fairmont Hotel in San Jose. Further details on the program and sign up can be found at http://www.smta.org/solar/

Jim: One more question for you Jasbir. I know from working with you in different associations, that you are personally invested and involved in the future of module assembly. What attracted you to this field, and what keeps you interested in it?

Jasbir: I have been involved previously in the electronics manufacturing industry during the transition from tin-lead to lead-free soldering due to environmental legislation requirements. This was a challenge being involved in both from a technical and logistics perspective, but it was also fun as you saw the rewards of your efforts when the transition occurred successfully.

The solar/PV industry has challenges in addressing how to produce good quality and reliable products at lower cost, and it gives me the opportunity to try to make a positive contribution in an evolving expanding industry.

Jasbir and I look forward to seeing you in San Jose!

~Jim

Eric Bastow recently wrote about using our Indalloy Flux #2 for soldering to Nitinol.  He did many tests and wrote an Application Note called Soldering to Nitinol.

Fort Wayne Metals, a leading supplier of medical wire (including Nitinol) also did a test on various fluxes as they relate to break load (maximum load before the joint breaks.

The fluxes tested included:

• Indalloy Flux #2 and Flux #3
• Indalloy Flux #5RMA; #5R; #5RA
• Indalloy Flux #4R
• Flux #400 (no longer commercially available)

The #5 series and the #4R were found to not be strong enough to clean off the tenacious oxides formed on Nitinol. Therefore, they didn't enable the solder to wet the surface properly.

Flux #2 and Flux#3 gave the best results (of the fluxes tested for break load) since they removed more of the oxides and allowed for a stronger solder bond.

Want to know more about soldering to this important medical material?  You can contact Eric Bastow directly at ebastow@indium.com or email us at medical@indium.com. 

Carol Gowans

cgowans@indium.com

Folks,

A reader writes:

My company makes an electronic product that requires a 40 year shelf life. We assemble with tin-lead solder on FR-4 PWBs. The product is to replace older technology (i.e. 1960-70s), but has some newer components such as BGAs, SOICs, and PQFPs. The product will be stored in dry nitrogen at 70F.  We take great care in manufacturing, by cleaning, inspecting, and testing the end product.

My question is, do you know of any studies that would discuss the reliability of products stored or in use for 40 years?

My sense is that our reader will be successful, but his question is profound and hard to answer with confidence. The military would like their electronics to perform for that long, but realistically much of it is replaced every ten years or so. If you look at something like the B-52 bomber, which debuted in 1952, the electronics have been upgraded regularly. So there isn’t as much 40 year electronics experience as one might think. An exception being the IBM AP-101 computer. This computer was kept in service for over 30 years, because it served its function and had survived the rigorous and expensive military qualification testing.

However, anecdotal data might support optimism for 40 year shelf life. In a class I teach at Dartmouth, The Technology of Everyday Things, I have sought out some old transistor radios from the late 1960s and early 70s to show the class how this old technology works. Anytime I have every found an old device like this, they always work, unless the batteries have leaked inside the radio.

This question raises an interesting thought. Although those of us in electronic assembly are concerned with tin-lead and lead-free solder joint life, what about the modern devices inside the components? Forty years is a long time. How will the 3D-22 nanometer copper circuit lines in a modern microprocessor hold up over this amount of time? These circuit lines lines are so fine that the 22 nanometer width is only about 70 atoms.  In addition, copper integrated circuits are still a relatively new technology. I’m sure much accelerated life testing has been done on such circuits, but would such testing confirm 40 years of shelf or service life?

I would appreciate any thoughts that readers have on these questions.

Cheers,

Dr. Ron

Two categories of solder are available to choose from when the in-service environment for a device reaches above 125°C either in continuous operation or thermal cycling accelerated life testing. These categories are those comprised primarily of lead, and those of gold. From the electronics industry’s drive to eliminate lead, many manufacturers who have traditionally used lead solders are treading cautiously, looking now at the gold solders, primarily at Indalloy 182 (80Au20Sn).

The most common concern regarding this switch relates to the strength of AuSn, which is much higher than the lead solders. The degree that this should be of concern however, should be realized within the scope of the application.

For instance, review this case scenario:

Indalloy 159 (90Pb10Sn) was used in a device for years to adhere high temperature sensors to a calibration probe that is slowly cycled in operation from 350K (~75°C) to 500K (~225°C). The solder joins a nickel and gold plated Kovar™, or platinum or platinum coated, nickel lead to a tinned copper lead. The solder joint is not placed under tension or shocked.

Considering the high temperature solder options in this scenario, the AuSn would be mechanically preferred.

Why?

Well, tin-bearing soft solders will leach gold from gold metallizations during soldering, creating a brittle Au-Sn intermetallic layer within the solder joint. The more gold available, the more consumed, and the greater the thickness of the resultant intermetallic layer. The brittle nature of this layer, situated intimately next to the relatively soft PbSn solder layer, creates differential stresses that promote crack propagation upon thermal cycling.

AuSn was not considered previously because the engineers were familiar with its hardness and, given the cracking failure described using a softer solder, they did not anticipate improvement. It was a pleasant surprise to them to find that switching to a lead-free solder would not sacrifice the quality of their device. AuSn is a brittle alloy but, unlike the description above, no differential stresses are involved. 

Note: Eutectic gold solders have been used for many years to solder nickel plated Kovar™ lids to high reliability ceramic packages and have a good history of fatigue performance.

Folks,

Patty arrived at work an hour early to prepare for her meeting with ACME CEO Mike Madigan. Nineteen days ago, he had asked her to develop an electronics assembly metric that would correlate with profitability. This metric would, in turn, be able to help pinpoint opportunities for improvement. He gave her 3 weeks, so she was two days early. Mike was in town to meet with Sam Watkins, the local plant manager, so he ordered that they meet. 

Patty had quickly identified non-material assembly cost per I/O (NMAC/I/O) as a good metric candidate. She went to five of ACME’s plants and, after a day or two at each one, she collected all of the data she needed to prove her point. Rob helped her by writing an Excel® macro that would calculate NMAC/I/O and plot it versus profitability. The correlation coefficient was an outstanding 0.983.

While visiting the five factories, she tried to learn why those that had a poor NMAC/I/O were performing poorly. After a little checking, she and Pete discovered that the poor performing sites typically had lines that were not time balanced, had slow component placement machines, and occasionally had very slow printers or solder paste with poor response to pause. There was even one plant that was using a full wave solder process, when only 8 solder preforms would have done the job in the reflow process. None of these “problems” would show up if you were only tracking line uptime. In light of this situation, she also developed a plan to use NMAC/I/O to identify and implement opportunities for improvement.

As Patty headed toward Sam’s office, Sam’s administrative assistant invited Patty into the conference room to allow Patty to get her laptop set up. Just as she finished setting up and her Powerpoint® presentation was on the screen, Sam and Mike walked in.

“Coleman, we’re counting on you to take us to the next level,” Mike said a little gruffly, so let’s get this show going.”

Patty looked at Sam and could tell that Sam was uncomfortable with his boss’s abrupt demeanor.

“I performed quite a bit of research and concluded that non material assembly cost per I/O is the best metric,” Patty started.

“That’s great Coleman, but what the hell is non material whatever you said,” Madigan interrupted.

Patty’s cell phone vibrated, but she ignored it.

“Non material assembly cost per I/O is the total cost of running a factory less the components, hardware, and PWBs used. Some people call this the conversion cost,” Patty answered.

“If you think about it, it is almost obvious that this is the best metric,” Patty went on, “it measures all of the non material cost divided by how much we produce.”

“I get it,” said Sam, “we are producing I/Os or solder joints, we measure the total cost to make solder joints and divide by the number of solder joints. It’s that simple.”

“Precisely,” Patty responded.

“I understand now, why uptime alone wasn’t a complete metric. You can be up and running, but be doing it inefficiently,” Mike said with a rare smile on his face.

Patty’s cell phone vibrated again.

“Exactly,” Patty commented.

“OK, so we are going to measure NMAC/I/O,” Mike commanded, “How does it correlate to profit?” He finished.

“It is nearly perfect,” Patty said.

They continued their discussions and reviewed Patty’s plan to improve productivity at the sites with a high NMAC/I/O. Patty would take the lead on this effort.

As Patty got up to leave, Mike commanded, “Oh, and Coleman, find out why so few people use NMAC/I/O.”

Patty thought this was something to discuss with the Professor.

As Patty walked out of Sam’s office, Clare Perkins, Sam’s Admin stopped her.

“Ms. Coleman, your mother-in-law called, Rob has been taken to the hospital,” Clare said.

Cheers,
Dr. Ron

Folks,

I thought I would post a few short thoughts as the new year begins. Here it goes:

1.    A billion hours ago the stone-age was the future, a billion minutes ago Caesar ruled Rome, a billion seconds ago Jimmy Carter was President, a billion passives ago you took your last break (about 4 hours ago). As exciting as the latest quad core microprocessor is, the largest number of components that we assemble is passives, approaching two trillion per year. That is about 6 billion a day. If you lined up all of the 7 billion people in the world, each year you could give every man, woman and child several hundred passives from all of the passives that are produced. If two trillion passives (assume 0402s) were lined up end to end they would circle the earth 50 times!

2.    Schools in Indiana are no longer required to teach cursive writing. Key board skills are considered more important.  Yikes! I’m all for keyboard skills, but I want my grandkids to be able to write in cursive. If not, how do they write their names? Are we less than a generation away from people writing their names as an “X?”

3.    Thoughts on lead-free solder reliability in long term mission critical environments from a NASA study:

        “Test vehicles assembled with lead-free materials (notably tin-silver-copper) exhibited lower reliability under some test conditions.”

Some people would respond to this statement by saying, “I told you that lead-free solder was no good.” However, another way of stating the results would be, “Lead-free solder performed better in more tests than tin-lead solder did.” The ratio, by my count, was about 5 to 3 in favor of lead-free. However, I agree that lead-free is not ready for mission critical (>20-year) service life. The main reason being that, in some cases, when lead-free solder joints failed in these types of studies, the results were much, much worse than tin-lead solder joints. These failure modes need to be understood and addressed. In addition, tin whiskers and pad cratering are looming problems in these, mission critical, long service life quadrant D applications as discussed in the Navy's Manhattan Project (http://www.navyb2pcoe.org/pdf/LFEMP_book.pdf).

4.    SACM has arrived. SACM is a SAC105 alloy that is doped with manganese. Work performed on SACM by Liu, Lee, et al was reported in a May 2009 ECTC paper, Achieving High Reliability Low Cost Lead-Free SAC Solder Joints Via Mn Or Ce Doping. The thorough testing reported in this paper suggests that SACM has promise as a material candidate for quadrant D applications mentioned in #3. In explaining the superior performance of this material the authors state:

“The mechanism for high drop performance and high thermal cycling reliability can be attributed to a stabilized microstructure, with uniform distribution of fine IMC particles, presumably through the inclusion of Mn or Ce in the IMC.”

We have had to wait awhile for this material to become commercially available as it is a challenge to manufacture doped solders like this in large quantities.  I think this paper should be on you "must read" list.

5.   I had not planned on reading Steve Job’s biography , as I thought I knew quite a bit about him from reading recent articles in Forbes, Fortune and Business Week. But I went ahead and downloaded it to my Kindle anyway. This work by Walter Isaacson is a masterpiece. To share one tidbit from it that relates to those of us in electronic assembly: 

"In almost all cases electrical engineers first design the circuits that perform the functions of some device like a mobile phone or tablet. Mechanical Engineers are then left to fit the circuits into the “box.” (Hence MEs are often called “box stuffers” by EEs). Jobs completely changed this approach. He told the engineering team how he wanted the product to look and function first, then they had to determine how to make it work that way. I’m convinced that only through this approach are the revolutionary design concepts that Jobs and Apple came up with possible."

The book also points out his many flaws (e.g. Jobs would regularly park in handicap spots, the author reports several times that Jobs just didn’t think the rules applied to him, etc.). Another interesting thought (read it and see if you agree with me) that if Steve was not Paul Jobs' adopted son, Apple would have never happened.

Cheers,

Dr. Ron

Folks,

I’m taking a few moments from Wassail Weekend , held annually in my village, Woodstock VT, “The prettiest small town in America”, to write a post about last week’s workshops at ACI.

Indium colleague Ed Briggs and I gave a 3 hour presentation on “Lead-Free Assembly for High Yields and Reliability.” I think Ed’s analysis of “graping” and the “head-in-pillow” defect is the best around. 

There was quite a bit of discussion on the challenges faced by solder paste flux in the new world of lead-free solder paste and miniaturized components (i.e. very small solder paste deposits.) One of the hottest topics was nitrogen and lead-free SMT assembly. There seemed to be uniform agreement that solder paste users should be able to demand that their lead-free solder paste perform well with any PWB pad finish (e.g. OSP Immersion silver, electroless nickel gold, etc.) without the use of nitrogen. Not only does using nitrogen cost money, but it will usually make tombstoning worse. However, in the opinion of most people, nitrogen is a must for wave soldering and, since it minimizes dross development, it likely pays for itself.

After Ed and I finished, Fred Dimock, of BTU, gave one of the best talks I have ever experienced on reflow soldering. He discussed thermal profiling in detail, including the importance of assuring that thermocouples are not oxidized (when oxidized they lose accuracy). He also discussed a reflow oven design that minimizes temperature overshoot during heating, and undershoot when the heater is off. Understanding these topics is critical with the tight temperature control that many lead-free assemblers face.

Fred Verdi of ACI finished the meeting with an excellent presentation on “Pb-free Electronics for Aerospace and Defense.” Fred’s talk discussed the work that went into the “Manhattan Project.” A free download of the entire project report is available.

There appears to be agreement that acceptable lead-free reliability has been established for consumer products with lifetimes of 5 years or so, but not for military/aerospace electronics where lifetimes can be up to 40 years in harsh service conditions. These vast product lifetime and consequences of failure differences are depicted in the Fred's chart (above). Commercial products are in quadrant A and military/aerospace products in quadrant D.

One of the greatest risks faced by quadrant D products is tin whiskers. Fred spent quite a bit of time discussing this interesting phenomenon. One of the challenges of this risk is that there is no way to accelerate it, so you can’t do an equivalent test to accelerated thermal cycling or drop shock. Fred mentioned that there have now been verified tin whisker fails, the Toyota accelerator mechanism being a confirmed one.

In addition to tin whiskers, lead-free reliability for quadrant D products (with a service life of up to 40 years) in thermal cycle and other areas remains a concern.  I mention that tin pest was not on the list of issues for this quadrant.

Fred and the Manhattan Project Team have identified many "gaps" that need to be addressed to determine and mitigate the risk of lead-free assembly for quadrant D products.  They plan to start this approximately $100M program in 2013.

For those that missed this free workshop, ACI host Mike Prestoy is planning another one in 6 months.

Cheers,

Dr. Ron

Folks,

Let's look in on Patty......

Patty was just finishing a report on work that she and Pete had performed with a team of her ACME colleagues  on reducing the Head-in-Pillow (HIP) defect at a plant in Minnesota. HIP can be caused by printed circuit board and/or a BGA warping during reflow, and, occasionally, by poor wetting BGA solder balls. Fortunately, this case of HIP was due to just a little warping, so replacing the solder paste with one of the new formulations that was designed to minimize HIP had done the trick. Ten thousand boards were produced with no detectable HIP defects.

As Patty wrote the last sentence in the report, she gazed out the window at the dusting of snow that had fallen. She liked living in southern New Hampshire and was thrilled with the house that she and Rob had purchased six months ago in Exeter.  She had to admit that Phillips Exeter Academy was also a draw. She hoped her 18 month old sons, Michael and Peter, would attend high school there, when the time came.

Patty was jarred from these thoughts by the ringing of her phone. She looked at the caller ID and saw that it was Mike Madigan, the CEO of all of ACME. Her stomach tied up in a knot. Sam, her boss, had alluded to the fact that senior management wanted to make her a VP. He asked if she had any requirements to accept such an offer. She said that she wanted to stay located where she was and she wanted Pete to be on her staff. Still, she was a bit nervous about such a big change.

“Patty Coleman, how may I help you?” Patty answered.

“Coleman, this is Mike Madigan. Congratulations, you are our new VP of Technology and Productivity. You will report to me, but, since you are staying in New Hampshire, I want you to report dotted line to Sam for day-to-day things. Coleman, don’t let me down. You are the youngest VP in the history of ACME by 5 years,” Madigan said.

Patty was a little put off by his gruff manner, but had been told to expect it.

“Thank you Mister Madigan, I’ll do my best,” Patty responded.

“I already have an assignment for you,” Madigan went on.

“You have done great things by improving line uptime at many of our sites, and profitability is up everywhere, but I sense we are still missing something. Do you know why?” he asked.

“Because the correlation between profitability and uptime is not as strong as one would like?” Patty asked.

“Coleman, I’m already glad I promoted you! That is exactly my concern.   Explore the situation, fix it and give me a better metric. I want all sites to use this new metric so I will know which locations to focus on. I want a status report in 3 weeks.” Madigan finished.

“I'll get right on it Mister Madigan and will have an update in 3 weeks or sooner,” Patty answered, exhilarated, but a little shaky.

“Good! Oh and Patty, call me Mike. It’s not the 1960s you know,” he chuckled as he hung up.

Patty hung the phone up feeling happy and stressed. She was glad to get the promotion, but knew she had to deliver.

Patty had thought about this productivity metric concern in the past. She knew where to start, she would call The Professor. She was surprised when he picked up on the first ring.

“Patty, it’s great to hear from you. How are Rob and the boys? We expect to see your sons here at Ivy University as students in 16 years,” The Professor chuckled.

After exchanging a few more pleasantries and sharing the news about her promotion, Patty got right to the point.  

“Professor, I need a metric that measures total productivity in electronics assembly. Uptime is a great metric, but it doesn’t correlate one-to-one to profitability,” Patty explained.

Patty expressed her surprise that no metric for total productivity was in wide use. They discussed the issue for a few more moments and then The Professor had a recommendation. “Read the NEMI (National Electronics Manufacturing Initiative) 1998 and the iNEMI 2011  Technology Roadmaps. Focus on board assembly and I think you will find your answer,” The Professor suggested.

After a few more pleasantries, The Professor had a request.

“Patty, I am getting a little award in Washington, DC. I have room for two guests at the award presentation. I was hoping you and Rob would come,” The Professor requested.

Patty said she would check their schedules, but was sure it would work out. She was honored that he thought so much of her and Rob.

As she hung up the phone, she went to ACME’s Tech Library in search of the iNEMI roadmaps. She quickly found the 1998 NEMI Technology Roadmap, but unfortunately only a summary of the 2011 iNEMI Roadmap was available. She thought she would read the 2011 Roadmap summary first. It was overwhelmingly impressive in its coverage of technology, at the wafer, chip, component, and board levels. The thoughtful inputs of over 575 participants, from over 310 organizations, were clearly evident. All of the current and emerging technologies were presented in detail.

“What a treasure of information,” Patty thought.

But she didn’t see an answer to her question.

So she went to the “Board Assembly” section of the 1998 Roadmap and in a few minutes she saw the answer: Board Assembly Conversion Cost in cents/I/O.

“What a simple concept,” she thought.

As she studied the document it became clear that about 30% of it focused on reducing conversion costs. Conversion costs were defined as all of the cost of assembly minus materials cost. To give this metric meaning, to enable comparisons between different manufacturing sites, the total amount of conversion cost for a manufacturing site was divided by the total number of input/output (I/O) terminals (i.e. component leads) assembled.

“This makes sense,” she thought. “You add up all of the non-material costs of assembly and divide by all of the leads you assemble. This metric shows how efficiently you assemble each lead.”

It then dawned on her that she had seen a metric like this before. She saw the notebook from The Professor’s workshop on Cost Estimating in her bookcase.  She grabbed it and flipped through it. There it was: non material assembly cost per I/O (NMACIO).

The great mystery to her is why the folks at NEMI didn't emphasize these types of cost performance metrics in newer roadmaps.

Here is a list of tricks to help you overcome the issues that can arise while hand soldering silicon-based solar cells (and other applications as well). Some of these ideas are obvious for most, but all the suggestions can help you form a better solder joint - and build a better final product:

1)    Use the correct soldering tip. I’ve made the mistake of using an inappropriate solder tip before, and so have many of my customers. It’s a frustrating problem you will only let happen to you once: everything is set up perfectly but nothing will melt, until you notice the solder tip is not the correct size or shape. This has happened to many of my customers who were initially using cone point soldering tips when they were working with 2mm wide solder coated tabbing ribbon. Simply changing the tip to a 2mm wide chisel point made all the difference, and promoted soldering readily. Why such a big difference in performance? The chisel tip allows heat to flow across the ribbon, instead of only heating a single point. More heat flow = more heat in your solder joint.

2)    Pre-tin the soldering iron. Just as an appropriately sized soldering tip will distribute heat across the soldering surface, a bit of molten alloy can help create a thermal interface to maximize heat transfer. Remember to melt a small amount of solder onto the tip of your iron before soldering, and be sure it’s the same alloy you are soldering with. (Leave the custom alloying to us ;)

3)    Consider the alloy you are soldering. All the heat your typical soldering iron can produce will not be enough to melt some of the highest temperature alloys. Be sure to have a good understanding of the alloy you have selected. In some cases with low-temperature alloys (like bismuth or indium alloys), excessive soldering temperature can de-wet the alloy and char low temperature fluxes.

4)    Use the correct flux. Fluxes are quite different, I’ve spent my entire soldering career trying to get that point across. There are fluxes for high temperatures or low temperatures, cleaning with water or not cleaning at all. There are specialty fluxes for specialty alloys and there are fluxes for different soldering surfaces. Use the correct flux. If you don’t know what the best flux for the application is - just ask; that’s what I am here for.

5)    Use a bottom side heater. Silicon is known to pull heat away – that c-Si solar cell that needs to be soldered is a heatsink! Some solder equipment vendors also provide underside heating pads to help prevent excessive heat loss.

6)    Keep your soldering iron clean. That black crud that builds up on your soldering iron tip, it’s not helping you form a good solder joint. Those oxides and charred flux residues can easily be removed by wiping the hot iron across the wet sponge (that should be at your soldering station). A clean tip will lead to better heat transfer, and it will make the fluxes you use more effective.

This is the soldering station I use, it’s a PS-900 supplied by OK International. Just about any soldering iron will work, but they won’t all work as well – or come with as good support.

I’m still learning all the tricks to hand soldering, so feel free to share any you have learned over the years!

~Jim

Folks,

In addition to electronics assembly productivity, solder paste and solder preform applications, and other electronics assembly concerns, many of you know that I teach statistics and have been a life-long math nerd. So, I was intrigued when good friend Rick Short, alerted me to the New Orleans Saints football team being 0-11 for coin tosses this season. One naturally asks, how unusual is this result?

Assuming a fair coin, there is a 50% chance of winning or losing on each flip. The chances of losing two times in a row is 0.5 x 0.5 = 0.25. The chances of losing 11 times in a row, in the first 11 tosses, is 0.5^11= 0.00048828125. Or about 2000 to 1 ( 1/0.00048828125 = 2048) as the article points out. Wow!, seems unusual. However, there are 32 teams, and it has only happened to one team. So what is the likelihood of this happening to one team this year? This calculation is a little more tricky. The easiest way to calculate it is to ask the question, what is the likelihood of this event not happening to any team?

The chances of not losing 11 in a row, in the first 11 tosses, for any team is 1-0.00048828125 =0.99951171875. So the chances that none of the 32 teams would lose 11 coin tosses in a row is 0.99951171875^32=0.98449268023. The chances that at least one team might lose 11 in a row is 1 minus this number or 1-0.98449268023= 0.015507319766 or about 1.55%. This number is still quite low. But what if we looked a 50 seasons?

The chances that 50 seasons would go by and no team would lose the first 11 coin tosses in a row is 0.98449268023^50 = 0.45774601688. So in 50 seasons, with a 32 team league, the chances are 45.77% no team would lose the first 11 coin tosses in a row, or 54.23% that at least one team would. Since these odds are close to 50/50, in fifty years, the Saint coin toss loss string is a 50 year event.

The article goes on to state:

               “And while the Saints are 7-3 and lead the NFC South despite coming up short every single time on what should be a 50-50 proposition, coin-toss statistics — yes, they do exist — show that the NFL team that won the pregame flip wound up winning 52.1 percent of the time through Week 10 this season, according to STATS LLC.

That’s about the same as the 52.6 percent that STATS shows for coin-toss “victories” matching up with game victories since the start of the 2008 season, when the NFL changed the rules to allow the team that wins the toss to defer its choice until the second half.”

If there is interest, I will see I can calculate the statistical significance of this apparent coin toss win 2.6% advantage. My guesstimate is that the difference is quite statistically significant.

Note: Some readers may ask why I have used so many decimal places in my answers. Experience has taught me that when you are taking numbers to very high powers (the 32^nd and then the 50^th) that rounding errors can be great.  In addition, noticed that I often said the "first 11 coin tosses." The odds would be higher to get eleven in a row out of a larger number of tosses, say 16.

Cheers,

Dr. Ron

Folks,

The Guadalajara (GDL), MX Chapter of the SMTA held their first meeting on November 9 and 10 at CETI in GDL.
Approximately 70 engineers from local companies attended. It was a great success. 

The agenda was:

November 9^th, 2011

0830-0900am    Registration and Exhibits Open

0900-0915am    Welcoming Remarks and Exhibition starts

0915-1045am    Inventec: “Reliability Assessment regarding Flux residues"

1045-1215pm    Sanmina-SCI: “Capabilities of a Failure Analysis Lab”

1215-1315pm    LUNCH

1315-1445pm    DEK: "Optimizing the Print Process for Mixed Technology"

1445 -1615pm   Vitronics Soltec: “How to Choose a Robust Configuration for Equipment
                          for Defect Free Soldering - Reflow, Wave and Selective”

1615-1745pm    KIC: “Fixing Reflow and Wave Related Defects as Well as How to Avoid 
                          Them in the First Place”

 November 10^th, 2011

0900-1030am    Sanmina-SCI: “Process development of 01005 components”

1030-1200pm    Indium: "Lead-Free Assembly for High Yields and Reliability."

1200-1300pm    LUNCH

1300-1430pm    Universal Instruments: "Tutorial on Failure Analysis"

1430-1600pm    Zestron: “PCB cleaning before conformal coating”

1600-1730pm    Kester: “Understanding Soldering Chemistries - Reducing Costly
                          Defects, Increasing Yields and Reliability.

I spoke on “Lead-Free Assembly for High Yields and Reliability." We had several raffles and gave away autographed copies of my book “The Adventures of Patty and the Professor,” which has just recently been formally published. 

As usual, I had dinner at Santo Coyote, one of my favorite restaurants, however my Mexican friends also took me to Sacromonte, claiming it had better food. They were correct. I was convinced to try chicken mole which I liked. It is tough to beat Santo Coyote’s ambiance, however.

I can’t cite data for this, but I am quite sure that GDL has the largest number of workers in electronics assembly outside of Asia. It is great news that they now have an SMTA chapter to help the local engineers network and continue to grow in their skills.  It was great to play a small part in this success, but most of the credit must go to Indium Corporation’s Ivan Castellanos who is chapter president and Kester’s Miguel Vazquez, chapter vice president.

Cheers,

Dr. Ron

Folks,

Some time ago, I mentioned that I was working on a consensus of the status of lead-free/RoHS compliant assembly. My hope is to find data and facts that will support the consensus. I am making progress, but at this time I would like to share the subtopics in the consensus. Look them over and see what you think:

1.       Was/Is lead-free electronics/RoHS needed to protect the environment?

2.      Is lead-free solder easier and safer to recycle than lead-containing solder?

3.      How has the increased use of tin and silver affected their supply and price?

4.      How much did it cost to implement lead-free/RoHS compliant electronics?

a.      What is the cost adder to a typical lead-free product?

5.      What are the process challenges of lead-free assembly?

a.      Are these challenges being addressed?

b.      If so, how?

6.        What is the reliability of lead-free vs leaded electronics for commercial applications?

a.      E.g. 0C to 100C thermal cycle, drop shock

7.        What is the reliability of lead-free vs leaded electronics for harsh environment/military applications?

a.      E.g. -55C to 125C thermal cycle, other Mil stress tests

8.      What is the threat of tin whiskers, tin pest and other similar lead-free related reliability phenomena?

9.      What is the status and need for halogen-free assembly?

Help me by suggesting topics that I have left out.     
Contact info here.
Cheers,
Dr. Ron