Indium Corporation®

Indium Corporation Blogs

  • People
    • Technical Support Engineers
    • Sales
    • Human Resources
      • Jobs
      • Community Support
    • Marketing Communications
      • Trade Shows
      • Company News
      • Corporate Awards
      • Technical Milestones
      • Social Media
    • Employee Biographies
    • Corporate
      • About Us
      • Social Responsibility
      • Company News
      • Corporate Awards
      • ISO and ITAR
      • Trade Shows
      • Corporate Literature
    • Bloggers
    • Social Media
    • Facilities
    • Contact Us
  • Products
    • Flux and Epoxy
      • Ball-Attach Flux
      • Epoxy Flux
      • Flip-Chip Flux
      • Flux Pens
      • Flux-Cored Wire
      • Industrial Flux
      • Liquid Tabbing Flux
      • Package-on-Package Flux
      • Tacky Flux
      • TCB and Copper PIllar Flux
      • Wave Flux
      • Wafer Bumping Flux
    • Inorganic Compounds
      • Featured Products
      • Indium Compounds
      • Gallium Compounds
      • Germanium Compounds
    • Metals
      • Indium
      • Gallium
      • Tin
      • Germanium
      • Reclaim and Recycle
    • NanoFoil®
      • Sheets
      • Preforms
      • Powders and Particles
      • Sputtering Target Bonding
    • Reclaim and Recycle
      • Solder and Solder Dross Recycle Program
    • Solar Assembly Materials
      • Metallization Paste
      • SUNTAB™ PV Ribbon
      • Liquid Tabbing Flux
      • Solders
    • Solder Paste and Powders
      • SACM™
      • Indium8.9 Series
      • Lead-Free
      • Tin-Lead
      • Package-on-Package Paste
      • Low Temp/High Temp
      • Die-Attach
      • Wafer Bumping Paste
      • Solder Fortification®
      • Gold-Based Solder Paste
    • Solders
      • Bismuth Solders
      • Gold Solders
      • Indium Solders
      • Bar Solder
      • Low Temp/High Temp
      • Preforms
      • Ribbon and Foil
      • Solder Fortification®
      • Spheres
      • Tape and Reel Packaging
      • Solder Paste and Powders
      • Wire
      • Alloy Chart
    • Thermal Interface Materials
      • Heat-Spring®
      • NanoFoil®
      • Preforms
      • Ribbon and Foil
      • Other
      • Solder TIM
    • Thin-Film Materials
      • Featured Products
      • Sputtering Targets
      • Indium
      • Gallium
      • Others
  • Applications
    • Compounds
      • Batteries
      • Catalysts
      • Fiber Optics
      • LED MOCVD Precursors
      • Optical Lens
      • Reclaim and Recovery
    • Engineered Solder and Alloys
      • Connector Assembly
      • Cryogenic Seals
      • Die-Attach
      • Hermetic Sealing and Pass Throughs
      • IGBT
      • Medical Devices and Electronics
      • Thermal Management
    • LED
    • Low Temperature Alloys
    • Medical Devices and Electronics
    • PCB Assembly
      • Package-on-Package
      • Rework and Touch-Up
      • Solder Fortification®
      • Surface Mount
      • Thermal Management
      • Wave Solder
    • Semiconductor and Advanced Assembly
      • 2.5 and 3D Packages
      • Ball-Attach
      • Die-Attach
      • Flip-Chip
      • Package-on-Package
      • Pb-Free Including High Temperature Pb-Free
      • Shock Resistance Solutions
      • SnPb Including High Temperature High Pb
    • Thermal Management
      • Burn-in and Test
      • Concentrated Photovoltaic
      • IGBT
      • RF Power Devices
      • TIM1, TIM1.5, TIM2
    • Thin-Film
      • Thermal Evaporation
      • Plating
      • PV Sputtering Targets
      • Target Bonding
      • PVD Coating Materials
  • Contact Us

Home Page

Return to Blog Summary Page ↑

Silver-free and Low-Silver Solder Alloys for SMT Discussion, Part 1: Reliability

Posted by Mario Scalzo on Thursday, May 19, 2011

There seems to be a growing trend to use a low-Ag or Ag-free solder alloy for Surface Mount Technology (SMT) electronics assembly, similar to what is commonly offered for bar solder, used in wave and selective soldering.

For through-hole performance, the strength and stability come from the entire barrel of solder, whereas it is usually the foot and heel fillets that give SMT solder joints their strength.

Printed Solder Paste.Lets talk about the other issue with using a eutectic solder alloy in SMT: tombstoning.  One of the benefits of using the SAC (tin-silver-copper) alloy for SMT and solder paste, is that it has a built-in plastic range, similar to that of Sn62 (62Sn 36Pb 2Ag).  It is this plastic range that prevents tombstoning, and takes into account the inconsistent heating of the solder across the part (which is the sole cause of tombstoning).  Switching to a eutectic alloy eliminates the plastic range and opens the door for tombstoning.

Any powder manufacturing issues, such as the inconsistent distribution of dopants throughout the alloy and powder matrix, takes a back seat to the surface mount reliability concerns. 

There are other alternatives, such as SAC0307 (99Sn 0.3Ag 0.7Cu)… But, with the price of Ag finally coming down, and a long history of SAC usage, we don’t think it’s going to be a major player.

Next time, we'll talk about the manufacturing and costs associated with low-Ag and Ag-free alloys. 

I hope this helps. Contact me with any questions.

Leave a Comment »

Wave Solder Flux Deactivation Temperatures Explained

Posted by Mario Scalzo on Monday, January 17, 2011

The "wave soldering flux deactivation temperature question" arises every few weeks, and the easy answer is that wave solder fluxes are designed to see the temperature of the wave.Wave Solder Flux Deactivation Temperatures Explained

Now, in order to pass SIR testing, the test boards with the wave fluxes are sent through the wave pattern up, not in direct contact with the molten alloy. They still see the majority of the heat from the wave.

The “deactivation” temperature varies from process to process because of the differences in board complexity, flux application, and preheat, as it is really a matter of total energy input, rather than a specific temperature.

The potential for reduced SIR is the main issue, not necessarily ECM or corrosion.  With a rosin-free flux, there may be some visual clues, as well. If you see that the flux has dried to a white, powdery residue that may be a sign that it had not seen temperatures.

We get this question mostly from corporations that believe they can use the same flux formulation for wave soldering and hand assembly / rework. Wave fluxes are not designed for hand soldering, and will more than likely cause some sort of downstream issue if used as such.

Feel free to ask me any questions about your process!  From One Engineer To Another!

Leave a Comment »

Will Multiple Reflows Damage My Solder Joint?

Posted by Mario Scalzo on Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Will Multiple Reflows Damage My Solder Joint?I just received a customer inquiry regarding a phenomenon that is little studied and even less quantified; “How many times can I reflow a solder alloy before damaging the solder joint?”

As you may already know, each time you bring a solder alloy above its liquidus temperature, it continues to dissolve the metallizations on the substrate to which you are soldering, as well as the metallizations on the leads of the component being attached. With modern processes, a 3-time “excursion” is common, especially with double-sided reflow and rework. Typically, the solder applied with paste is not reflowed again during the wave, because, through the use of pallets or selective soldering, it doesn't get quite hot enough to melt. That said, in such a case, the solder joint may become hot enough to receive some damage. To me, the most interesting thing with crystalline intermetallic layers, is that they don’t need to reach liquidus to form larger crystals. So a temperature excursion close to the liquidus may also increase the crystal structure size.

Another factor is surface metallizations, especially easy-to-solder surfaces such as gold or HASL. With gold, molten Sn/Pb solder at 200°C will dissolve at 35u-inch/s. So, a fine flash layer, such as 3-5u-inch, is gone within the first second, and the actual intermetallic is formed to the underlayment; most commonly nickel (Ni). This is similar with HASL, as the HASL layer is consumed into the solder joint at liquidus, and the intermetallic layer is formed with what is beneath the HASL.

The intermetallic layer will increase with time above liquidus (TAL) and also with temperature, with hotter dissolving more of the surface. This is why there are operating temperature limitations on the final solder joint, such as no more than 90% of the solidus of the alloy, in degrees Kelvin.

Another factor that affects grain structure, besides TAL and peak temperature, is cool-down rate. A faster cool-down rate will form a smaller crystalline grain structure, but keep in mind that a too-fast cool down rate may result in stresses being trapped in the grain structure from the CTE mismatch between the component and the substrate.

It has been our experience that 3 temperature excursions is the accepted limit (by most companies that I work). But, the only recommendation that we can offer is that you try “worst-case” scenarios, and have ALT testing and SEM cross-sections performed on real-world products in which 3, 4, and 5 excursions have taken place. Your particular case may be unique - it is well-worth determining your particular situation.

Leave a Comment »

Conquering Tombstoning

Posted by Mario Scalzo on Tuesday, December 21, 2010

Tombstoning, simply, is the wetting of one side of a component before the other side, which causes the setting forces of the solder to lift the component like a drawbridge.  Sometimes, it even cause the component to complete stand, like a tombstone.

Eliminating Tombstoning Defects

There are several ways to counteract whatever cause is making the defect occur.  All of them include either getting the component to come to the same temperature at the same time, or allow for flexibility in the melting point of the solder during reflow.

Below are some ideas on how tombstoning can be eliminated.

 

1.   Eliminate Nitrogen reflow - Nitrogen reflow prevents the additional build up of new oxides on surfaces and the solder alloy, and allows more activator to be used for wetting, increasing the wetting force.

2.   Lower the delta-T across the board and component to <10°C -  This allows for more stable temperatures through liquidus, which equalizes the wetting on both sides of the affected components.

3.   Slowing the ramp rate of the components through reflow to ~0.5°C/s - This allows both sides of the component to come to temperature simultaneously.

4.   Introduce an anti-tombstoning alloy, such as the Ind100 (62.6Sn 37Pb 0.4Ag, which has a 4-6°C plastic range.

5.   Increase placement pressure and depth, which uses the tackiness of the paste to hold the component in place.

6.   Proper placement ensures that the component is centered between the pads.

7.   Stencil design ideas, such as home plate or reverse home plate, takes advantage of the alloy’s wettability and uses it to your advantage to solder the part to board, rather than using the wetting of the alloy to lift the part.

8.  Ensuring proper board and Pad design makes sure that there is not solder-robbing, where the solder flows along a trace, and doesn’t leave enough for the component.

 

These are tried and true methods that I have used in the past with customers that have seen tombstoning.
Leave a Comment »

Low Temperature Indalloy Solder Alloys for Heat Pipe Attach

Posted by Mario Scalzo on Wednesday, December 1, 2010
After a long and involved conversation with colleagues regarding attaching heat pipes using a low temperature solder, such as Indalloy 290 (97In 3Ag; 143 C) or Ind281 (58Bi 42Sn; 139 C) , here are a few ideas that we've come up with to make your decision easier.Pure Bismuth - Used in Indalloy 281 (58Bi 42Sn)

You can use either Ind290 (97In 3Ag) or Ind281 (58Bi 42Sn) in your process for bonding the copper heat pipes.  But, if you are going to solder to bare copper, we do not recommend the use of an In-containing alloy.

HARD:
When soldering to hard-to-wet materials like aluminum, you can use the Indalloy Flux #3 to bond directly to an aluminum heat-sink. The very strong Flux #3 would have to be removed after soldering, but would provide the best solder joint.

EASIER:
If you use bare Ni on the surfaces you can use either alloy. More good news, you can also use a less aggressive flux. In this case, consider using a flux such as 4-OA, which is easier to use than the Flux #3, but would still have to be cleaned after soldering.

EVEN EASIER:
If you plate a solderable surface over the Ni, such as Ag, Sn, or Au, then you can use an even less aggressive flux than that, such as a No-Clean type, like 5-RMA.


In the end, Indalloy 281 (58Bi 42Sn) was chosen for the bare copper heat pipe. 
 

Should you have any further questions, please don’t hesitate to ask.  Click LEARN MORE - EMAIL AUTHOR below. Or feel free to make a comment - below.

Leave a Comment »

Mixed Alloy Wetting for SAC BGA Assembly Using Sn63 Solder Paste

Posted by Mario Scalzo on Thursday, June 18, 2009

 

Have you ever wondered about what happens to a Pb-free Ball-Grid Array (BGA), with Tin/Silver/Copper (SAC) spheres in a Tin/Lead (Sn/Pb) process? Well, after some recent testing, I can share my results with you.
 
The testing was performed with Sn63 solder paste, at 208°C (most testing is performed at 25°C above liquidus) and depicts the dissolution of a SAC (SnAgCu) solder sphere into the molten Sn63 solder, below the melting temperature of the SAC alloy sphere. The purpose of this research is to demonstrate that BGA assembly (using these materials) can be affected at temperatures BELOW standard Pb-free reflow temperatures (~245°C).
 
It also shows the incredible solubility of Tin (Sn), and its ability to dissolve higher temperature materials. This is also true for harder materials, such as Nickel and Aluminum. Given the proper flux, you can use tin-based alloys to for the intermetallics that you need.

 
We are not suggesting that all BGA attachment be done at 208°C. In fact, it is much easier to use a standard Pb-free reflow profile with the Sn/Pb solder alloy paste to ensure that it all melts and forms a strong intermetallic, but for those process' where either the components or solder pastes have issues at higher temperatures, we are demonstrating that going all the way up to 245°C is not always required. We have all had experiences with Sn/Pb solder pastes with flux residues that decompose at >220°C, or seen warpage of BGA's at the same temperature range that cause head-in-pillow (HIP) issues.
 
A standard Sn/Pb reflow profile, with a peak temperature of 205-210°C, and a time above liquidus (TAL) of >60s can be used to get acceptable solder joints using a mixed alloy process.
more information may be found at the Indium Knowledge Base (IKB).
Leave a Comment »

What is a &#8220;Pasty Range&#8221;?

Posted by Mario Scalzo on Tuesday, June 9, 2009
Image from Metals Handbook

Image from Metals Handbook", Volume 6 (1983)

When it comes to solidus and liquidus temperatures, things aren't just black and white – (except for the graph shown here). 

Let's start with some terms:

"Solidus" refers to the temperature that an alloy melts at.  "Liquidus" is the temperature that the alloy turns completely liquid.  Solids turn directly into liquids when they are heated, right?  Not exactly.

When formulating alloys, there are usually one or more points in the constituent ratio where the metal will be at a "Eutectic" ratio.  This ratio is usually the lowest melting point for the different combinations of those elements.  For example, if you mix 63%Sn with 37%Pb, it will have a single temperature (183ºC) for both its solidus and liquidus.  If you mix the alloy with a different amount of Sn or Pb, the solidus may remain while the liquidus increases.  The range between these temperatures is often called the "pasty range".  During heating between the solidus and liquidus, most metals act very much like a liquid.  The resulting mixture of liquid and solid material is able to wet to surfaces and form intermetallics, although it is recommended that soldering be done above the liquidus point.

More information on measuring temperatures from Differential Scanning Calorimetry, check out our Application Note on Determining Solidus and Liquidus points.

Leave a Comment »

Helping out, the best way I know...

Posted by Mario Scalzo on Friday, May 1, 2009
Team Indium: (LtoR) Mario Scalzo, Pat Ryan, Dana Ebensperger, Bill Manning, Greg Evans, Anita Brown and Ed Gudlauski

Team Indium: (LtoR) Mario Scalzo, Pat Ryan, Dana Ebensperger, Bill Manning, Greg Evans, Anita Brown and Ed Gudlauski

I would like to take a moment and talk about something that has nothing to do with Head-in-pillow defects, Halogen-free solder paste or Pb-Free solder reflow.

When I was in High School in 1993, an adorable little girl was abducted less than 3 miles from my home.  This was an outrageous crime in a sleepy little New York town!

To raise awareness of this heinous crime, a group of 7 courageous bicyclists rode to Washington DC to raise awareness and preach children's safety along the way, arriving in DC on May 25th, the first National Missing Children's Day.

12 years later, over 400 riders, like us on Indium's team, ride 100 miles every May to commemorate this ride and to raise funding for the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, which works hand-in-hand with Law Enforcement to spread knowledge of and retrieval of missing kids.  We will always wear pink and blue in remembrance of that little girl, back in 1993 that was never found.

Our mission is "to make our children safer...one child at a time".  We have helped reunite 3000 of over 4600 missing children in 2008 with their parents and loved ones!

Donations are greatly appreciated and can be given on-line at Active.com/donate/RMFCCNY/MarioScalzo.  More information on our cause and our history can be found at RideForMissingChildren.com.

Leave a Comment »

Head-in-pillow Defects Attract non-SMT Attention

Posted by Mario Scalzo on Monday, April 13, 2009

What would bring a person from outside the SMT world to a website like Indium.com?  Why would a marketing guru have interest in head-in-pillow defects?

Just ask Michael Fitzgerald of BtoB Magazine.

So, besides leaking to the general public about search engine optimization (SEO) and using Google to our advantage, it shows that the trials and tribulations that we fight in our world everyday effects the general public.  We know that the head-in-pillow defect on that last board we built will go into someones MP3 player.  And, as soon as that someone, we'll call him Bob, goes for a jog in the middle of the winter, or sits under the sun at the beach, that head-in-pillow defect will comeback to haunt him, and Bob's MP3 player will die.

So, we thank Michael for awakening the general public on head-in-pillow defects, and even though bob doesn't care that we're fighting defects everyday, he knows exactly how he feels when his MP3 player dies.

My paper may be downloaded at Indium.com.

Leave a Comment »

APEX 2009

Posted by Mario Scalzo on Wednesday, April 8, 2009

This year we tried to plan something a little different for APEX.  Instead of the normal booth, we used the space as a meeting place for people to come and talk with other engineers (from Indium and other companies), charge their cell phone, and eat a healthy snack.  If you have been to any tradeshow in your life you'll understand – this was an oasis.

 

Many people that did not participate in APEX are asking what it was like, especially in light of the predicted drop in attendance.  We spoke with a few of the Indium members who made it out to Vegas this year to sum up APEX 2009:

 

Rick Short told us "…attendance was 25 to 30% lower than in 2008.  That said, the quality of the attendee was unusually high (KEY decision makers) and the number of really good leads that we captured was high.  We spent about 25% of what we spent in 2008 on the exhibit and did much better (leads)."

 

Dave Sbiroli mentioned "It's the same core group of industry experts that attend the show" in reference to the technical presentations and industry meetings.

 

Brandon Judd commented "Although we are in the middle of an economic downturn, there was definitely no lack of interest in Indium's solder products at this year's APEX EXPO in Las Vegas.  In fact, it was quite the contrary.  Several customers, both current and potential, approached our booth with new and exciting applications that show there just may be a light at the end of the tunnel for our industry."

 

Tim Jensen had this to say, "This year's APEX was probably the best in recent history.  While the attendance was down from last year, those who did attend came with a specific purpose: to educate themselves and solve their current issues.  At Indium Corporation, we were busy educating customers on the implications of going halogen-free and helping to address their current Pb-Free production challenges."

Leave a Comment »

Advanced Solder Paste is Key to Improving QFN Reliability

Posted by Mario Scalzo on Thursday, February 26, 2009
Paste deposits printed for a QFN footprint

Paste deposits printed for a QFN footprint

In an article from Circuits Assembly Magazine, solder paste is determined to be the key factor in proper QFN assembly.  Joseph Ameen and Gilson Geralde mention that "If too much solder is applied to the ground plane, the part will float, resulting in poor connections to the I/Os.  If too little is applied, insufficient grounding will result." 

 

Although this may not be groundbreaking, it's the reason we shoot for 100% transfer efficiency with our solder pastes.  Many solder pastes vary between 60% to 110%, while the best solder pastes will see tighter than 80% to 105% transfer efficiencies. 

 

Leave a Comment »

Virtual Reality? The Virtual-PCB Online Tradeshow

Posted by Mario Scalzo on Tuesday, February 24, 2009

For my next trick, I  will be participating in a chat session as part of the Virtual PCB Show on February 25th from 11:00AM to 11:45 AM. Our topic is "SMT Defects and Solutions".

To prepare for this first ever experience, I participated in an orientation that walked him through a virtual chat, which he found to be quite similar to Skype and AOL Messenger.
 
I think that many of the questions will be focused on the recurring themes we get in Tech Support every day. Printing and reflow issues seem to be the most common, especially slumping, tombstoning, non-wetting, and reflow flexibility. Voiding still continues to be an issue, but to a much lesser extend that in the past.
 
You can sit in on our chat by registering at: http://vshow.on24.com/clients/vshow/upmedia/register.htm
Leave a Comment »

Is DI-Water Becoming an Obsolete Cleaning Agent?

Posted by Mario Scalzo on Thursday, February 12, 2009

For our second guest blogger i would like to introduce Dr. Harald Wack, President of Zestron.  Zestron is manufacturer of flux residue cleaners and removers for our industry, and several other cleaning products for many other non-related industries.  Dr. Wack, take it away...

 

It is noteworthy to point out that most cleaning processes (for OA-flux removal) in the North American market rely on cleaning with DI-water only. Recent market studies suggest that water is beginning to reach its cleaning limitation, favoring the use of aqueous processes. Aqueous is a term that implies the use of aqueous-based chemistry; for example an application concentration of 10% mixed with DI-water. The nature of the ingredients within the aqueous product range varies between vendors and their respective chemical R&D knowledge and product technologies. These are in contrary to cleaning processes with DI-water only or with a solvent, which is used at a concentration of 100%. A solvent does not contain any water at all. After one decade of solvent based processes dominating the precision cleaning market, the current demands are relying on aqueous solutions as their cleaning window has been found to be the widest. A number of reasons can be cited supporting this trend.
 
Firstly, the increased use of lead-free solder, which require higher soldering temperatures and result in more burnt-in fluxes. These in turn are much harder to remove. DI-water alone has simply a limited, to no ability to solubilize non-ionic residues on the board's surface. Secondly, the cleaning of water-soluble fluxes (especially under components) has also become a lot more difficult. In other words, water with its high surface tension of over 70 dynes/cm cannot effectively penetrate low standoff components. As the standoff heights are decreasing further and component densities are increasing more and more, companies will have to improve their existing cleaning process. Chemistry assisted cleaning can reduce the surface tension to 30 dynes/cm and below. Interestingly, the industry so far has mostly reverted to adjust the DI-water based cleaning process to its respective limits. These limits entail for example an increase in operating temperatures to above 150°F, as well as an increase of the spray pressures, or the reduction of the belt speed to prolong the exposure time. With pure water-soluble fluxes in a eutectic environment such measures can provide sufficient cleaning results. Given the introduction of lead-free however, the solubility of residues in DI-water becomes the limiting aspect. If non-ionic contamination is produced, water alone cannot chemically dissolve such contamination. Much to everyone's surprise, a recent study has actually shown that lower chemical concentrations of only 5% and temperatures of 175°F and 200°F are producing the best cleaning results under components, period. Previously the industry considered 160°F as the highest possible cleaning temperature.
 
Another often overlooked consequence is that higher pressures and temperatures might allow the water to penetrate low standoff components by forcing water underneath or into the capillary spaces. Unfortunately, the cleaning equipment is often not capable of removing the water during the drying section. To limit the formation of electrochemical migration or leakage currents, it is of utmost importance to verify a dry, water and flux-free environment under components after the cleaning cycles are completed. Cleaning agents on the other hand can be easier rinsed and dried as lower surface tension allows a quick removal. The usage of chemistry in the long run seems therefore to be overall most beneficial. Yes, it's true, there is an additional process cost but the "value added" benefits are considerable. They include, but are not limited to better cleaning through lower ionic contamination, which in turn provides higher product reliability. Recent studies have also demonstrated better bonding and coating results after the introduction of chemistry assisted cleaning. To offset the added cost, users can operate at lower temperatures and with wider process windows one clean not only OA but also RMA and no-clean fluxes. This will become a requirement in the North American market as contract manufacturers are moving to lower volume, higher mix and a significantly more high reliability product. In the end, the introduction of a chemistry assisted cleaning process, will increase your cleaning process window and permit the de-fluxing of all production boards during a single cleaning process.
 
Despite all valid arguments encouraging the use of aqueous processes, the authors would like to caution interested users as well. Most equipments currently using strict DI-water are not properly plumbed to use chemistry. DI-water machines take the advantage of cascading DI-water tanks from the back to the front. Employing a chemical product in the wash tank would lead to continuous dilution of the recommended application concentration by DI-water. Companies that are strategically planning their capital purchases are therefore well advised to incorporate the mechanical option to run aqueous chemistries. As always, a slightly higher investment will provide significantly more process flexibility in years to come, and might lead to one or two additional contracts.
 
-Dr. Harald Wack

Should you have any question, please don't hesitate to contact me.  More information may be found at our Indium Knowledge Base (IKB) and Zestron.

Leave a Comment »

Solder Alloy Powder Misconceptions

Posted by Mario Scalzo on Thursday, January 15, 2009

For a change of pace, again, I have asked another Technical Support Engineer, Chris Nash, to comment about powder sizes.  Chris is the Regional Technical Support Engineer for the Midwest region, and works from Indium Corporation HQ in Clinton, NY.

Small components such as 0201's and Micro-BGA's are being implemented into circuit board design and manufacturing more often. Many people still haven't had the chance to use these in their process but have heard that this will soon be upon them. In planning for this many immediately think they will need to use a solder paste with a smaller powder size and consequently start considering type 5 and type 6 pastes. This is usually not necessary.            
 
Type 5 and type 6 powders/pastes are currently being used in applications such as wafer bumping, substrate bumping, package on package, and dispensing with very small needle diameters. Wafer Bumping and substrate bumping (for flip chip assembly where there is not enough solder present on the chip) applications are using type 5 or 6 pastes with a printing process that may be a bit different than the typical SMT process. Many of these applications are using a mask instead of a stencil. Once the solder has been reflowed the mask is stripped and solder bumps remain. The apertures that are used in this type of process are typically around 50 microns, much smaller than the typical SMT aperture size. Package on package applications are using type 5 and 6 pastes in a totally different way. The packages are being dipped (not printed) into the paste before placement. Dispensing solder paste out of a syringe will sometimes require a small power size like type 5 or 6 due to the needle size that some applications require (26-30 gauge needles). As you can see there currently is a need for type 5 or 6 solder paste but this need has not spread to typical SMT assembly quite yet.
 
The selection of the appropriate powder size for a specific solder paste application is a fundamental step that will ultimately affect the print-ability of the solder paste with respect to the stencil design. Stencil design, focusing specifically on area ratio, plays an even more crucial role in solder paste print-ability. Area ratio is essential to the printing process and powder choice. Calculating the area ratio and choosing the correct powder size can help ensure proper stencil release. The area ratio is the ratio between the area of the aperture opening and the area of the aperture walls [area of the opening/area of the walls ≥ 0.66]. Once the proper aperture size has been determined, the appropriate powder size can then be chosen. For all apertures, it is important to maintain a minimum of 4 or 5 solder particles (the large particle size of the range) across the aperture.
 
Current manufactures (typically hand held device manufacturers) that are using 0201's and small Micro-BGA's have developed their process around the area ratio rule of thumb.  Many of the manufacturers have decided that the best way to achieve close to 0.66 is to decrease the stencil thickness to 0.004".  Some manufactures have seen improved transfer efficiency results with a type 4 solder paste with less than 0.66 area ratios and have used this smaller powder size successfully.  Typically speaking, an area ratio greater than or equal to 0.66 will allow for the use of a type 3 solder paste. 
 
Thank you to Chris for helping out on this blog.  More inforamation may be found at the Indium Knowledge Base (IKB).
Leave a Comment »

Surface Finishes 3: Soldering to Immersion Silver (ImAg)

Posted by Mario Scalzo on Friday, October 31, 2008

Next on the soldering to list is soldering to immersion silver (ImAg). ImAg is probably the only solder finish that is sensitive to the profile used for reflow. Usually, the reflow profile can be changed to optimize for voiding, wetting or component limitations. But, ImAg has a track record of causing "champagne" voids.
 
Champagne voiding is a term used to describe small voids (bubbles) that form along either the intermetallic layer or ImAg surface. These voids are known to be caused by the volatization (out gassing) of the organic co-deposit that is put down with the silver during the plating process, or the out gassing of the tarnish layer after the flux has cleaned it from the surface.
 
On the other hand, being a metal surface, the in-circuit testing (ICT) is facilitated by the lack of a non-conductive layer (like Organic Solderability Protectant (OSP) over copper). So this means that printing of solder paste is not needed to make the contact points able to be probed. Another advantage is that the shelf life of the bare boards is longer than that of OSP copper and immersion tin (ImSn).
 
But, there are some reflow profile tricks that can be used to get a good, solid solder joint without the champagne voids. Typically, shorter profile work better, as they prevent the tarnishing of the silver as well as artificially increase the slumping of the paste to increase the spread. The solder spread is usually reduced on ImAg, as well, so the slumping of the paste to increase the spread of the solder helps 2-fold.
 
Take it from experience; soaking the paste to remove the voiding on ImAg boards does not work. Short, fast and cool is the way to go.
 

Leave a Comment »

Surface Finishes 2: Soldering to Copper and Soldering to OSP

Posted by Mario Scalzo on Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Soldering to copper has been around since the beginning of soldering itself. Copper wiring and copper pipes are where soldering began, and copper is still the most common wire conductor, and soldering to it is still easy.
 
Copper for printed wiring boards (PWB's) have been around just as long, dating back to the first "computers", basically room sized calculators. But, since copper oxidizes, one way of protecting it is coating it. The coating is called Organic Solderability Preservative, or OSP. OSP copper is different from the other surface finishes because it is the only surface finish that covers the solderable surface and is eliminated during soldering, rather than consumed. And since copper is usually the base metal that we are soldering to anyway, why pay for the extra metal, such as tin, silver or nickel/gold, if just a "plastic" coating will work. This is especially true since OSP copper does not require any special reflow profiling or needs, such as a high peak temperature, or long time above liquids (TAL).
 
Like all surface finishes, OSP copper has some issues that we must look out for. First is the fact that since it is a non-metallic coating, any in-circuit testing must be done on a solder joint, as the test probes cannot pierce the coating to get to the copper underneath. One way around this is to apply solder paste to the test probe pads, and allow the solder to wet through the OSP.
 
Another potential issue is that since OSP is eliminated during the soldering process, multiple reflows, such as for 2nd side soldering or a final step of selective wave soldering, tend to break down the OSP surface and allowing the copper oxidize. Typically, the copper is pretty well oxidized once the board has been sent through the reflow oven twice, and then sent to the wave machine for selective soldering, requiring the use of a strong flux to remove the copper's oxidation.

Leave a Comment »

Surface Finishes 1: Soldering Overview

Posted by Mario Scalzo on Monday, October 13, 2008

Soldering just plain copper has gone away. Now, there are many different surface finishes that we, as an industry, solder to. This includes Organic Solderability Preservative (OSP) copper, immersion silver (ImAg), immersion tin (ImSn) and Electroless Nickel / Immersion Gold (ENIG).

Each one of these surfaces has its own benefits and downfalls, as well as their own set of requirements to solder to them properly, with the best looking, highest tensile strength and lowest voiding solder joint possible. This list does not include the other surfaces, usually on components, that we must solder to. Such as bright tin, matte tin, Hot Air Solder Leveling (HASL), pure nickel, etc…

We will talk about OSP, ImAg, ImSn and ENIG, and discuss their strengths, weaknesses and how to solder to them. This includes discussions on relative shelf life, history of use, what to look for and special reflow needs.

Leave a Comment »

Issues with using Indium for Wafer Bumping

Posted by Mario Scalzo on Friday, September 5, 2008

Lets talk about some issues…

 
The first thing that I am worried about is the use of a small particle size of Indium-containing alloys. Indium is self-passivating, and will clump and cold weld to itself, even when stored as powder. For this reason we look at each individual case separately. Normally, we do not recommend the use of Indium alloys for solder powders that are smaller than Type 4 (20-38μm). For small aperture sizes, you would need a Type 5 (20-25μm). The smaller the powder size, the larger the surface area, so as the indium-containing powders get smaller, the more tendency to cold-weld in the packaging.
 
Which leads us to my second concern, which is the higher metal percentage in wafer pastes. Usually, in order to print through the smaller apertures (and lower area ratios) for wafer bumping, the solder paste has a higher metal percentage. For these wafer pastes, the metal percents are usually >92%. Which makes them very prone to cold-welding.
 
For example, the area ratio for an aperture opening of 140μm with a 90μm thick stencil is 0.39.  Area ratios that are below 0.50 are not recommended.
 
 
We can physically manufacture the paste, but whether it will be useable when you get it is the problems.

More information may be found at IKB: Indium Knowledge Base.

Leave a Comment »

Choosing Powder Size Part 2: Printing

Posted by Mario Scalzo on Thursday, July 24, 2008

Solder paste for printing follows the same guidelines as solder paste for dispensing. The good news about solder paste for printing is the apertures that are printed through are usually significantly larger than the needles used for dispensing. The BIG difference is that the paste is not as susceptible to air bubbles that would cause skips or clumping that would cause clogging.

 
Although stencils make a difference in the amount of paste applied, it is the paste itself that makes all the difference. Stencil release, often-called transfer efficiency or TE, can be tracked through a paste measurement system. By feeding the stencil details into the paste measurement system at onset, the system can calculate the theoretical amount of paste that should be deposited, and can create a percentage (efficiency) from measuring the amount of paste that was actually deposited.
 
Transfer efficiency is just now becoming something that we are tracking scientifically (read statistically). Some variables that can affect transfer efficiency are stencil type, atmospheric conditions and the paste itself.
 
For stencils, material makes the most difference. There are 3 types of stencils that we normally come across when visiting customers, they are Laser cut, laser cut with electro-polish, and electro-deposited (or e-fab). Also, the transfer efficiency commonly increases from laser cut, laser cut with polish and e-fab. The manufacturing cost usually increases across the three types, respectively.
 
Room temperature, and sometimes humidity, also affects transfer efficiency as the viscosity usually drops when solder paste is warmer, as well as the paste also becomes less tacky at warmer temperatures. Humidity affect water washable paste in the same ways, so much so that cold slump may be induced.
 
Most of the time, it is the paste itself, and the rosin, thickener or solvent constituents that affect the stencil release of the paste. As mentioned before, it is only in recent years that transfer efficiency is being statistically tracked to the point that the formulation may be tweaked to attain higher numbers.
 

More information may be found at IKB: Indium Knowledge Base.

Leave a Comment »

Choosing Powder Size Part 1: Dispensing

Posted by Mario Scalzo on Wednesday, July 23, 2008

Again, there has been a trend in the past few days that shows me that there is something happening.  People are looking towards a new application or project, and realizing that they need solder paste and don't know what size powder they need.  As an engineer, we have graphs and posters of data on the walls at our desks for easy reference, but i think that there should be more reasoning behind what we recommend other than just cross-referencing.

Dispensing is a good place to start, because solder paste for dispensing is more subject to the process constraints than solder paste for printing.  Making a recommendation for solder paste dispensing is fairly straight forward, and mostly (yes, mostly) depends on the size needle that is to be used.  Case in point, the Solar Materials Manager came to my desk and explained that a customer was having serious issues dispensing.  After some discussion, we found out that the customer was using a 20-gauge (0.023" ID) needle.  this itself is nothing out of the ordinary.  But, after digging, we found out that they were using a Type 2 (-200+325 mesh or 45-75um) powder and a metal percent of 87%.  This would explain why they were seeing clogging and "skips".
For future reference, I have attached a great picture of what we use to determine which powder size.  In a nutshell, I would try to fit at least 7 spheres of powder across the ID of the needle, if the powder was all on the large side of the specification.  For example, for a Type 3 mesh (24-45um), the smallest size diameter needle I would recommend is a 23-gauge (330um).  This is because ~7 45um powder spheres would fit in the 330um diameter needle.
 
Some people would ask why not just go to the smallest size powder, then you would not have any issue dispensing through any size needle greater than a 30-gauge.  This is a no-no, as there are too many drawbacks to this approach.  These include the high cost of the smaller powder sizes and the higher oxide content of the smaller particles, which may cause drying of the paste in the tubes.
 
More information may be available at the IKB: Indium Knowledge Base.
Leave a Comment »
Next Page >>

From One Engineer to Another®

Indium Corporation — ©1996–2013. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by Compendium

Contact Mario Scalzo

+1.315.853.4900

mscalzo@indium.com

Read Mario Scalzo’s Blog

View Mario Scalzo’s Bio

Subscribe

Feed

Email

Translations

  • German
  • Spanish
  • French
  • Korean
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)

Categories

  • Alloys Solder
  • Antimony Solder
  • AuSn
  • B2B Marcom
  • Ball Attach
  • Bar Flux
  • Bar Solder
  • Bar Wave
  • BGA
  • BGA Process
  • Bismuth
  • Bismuth Alloys
  • Bismuth Tin Alloy
  • Bonding Ribbon
  • BtoB Marcom
  • Burn In
  • Bus Ribbon
  • Chip Attach
  • CIG
  • Clad Preforms
  • Connected Preform
  • Copper Indium Gallium
  • Cored Solder
  • Cored Solder Wire
  • Cored Wire Solder
  • Die Attach
  • Dipping Flux
  • Dipping Paste
  • Epoxy Flux
  • Flux
  • Flux Cleaning
  • Flux Cored Solder
  • Flux in Soldering
  • Flux Pen
  • Fusible Alloy
  • Gallium Alloy
  • Gold Indium
  • Gold Tin
  • Graping
  • Halogen Free
  • Hand Soldering
  • Head In Pillow
  • Heat Spring
  • Hermetic Sealing
  • Indalloy
  • Indium
  • Indium Alloy
  • INDIUM CORPORATION
  • Indium Tin Oxide
  • Indium Wire
  • Intermetallic
  • Lead Free Assembly
  • Lead Free Paste
  • Lead Free Profile
  • Lead Free Silver Solder
  • Lead Free Solder Flux
  • Lead Free Solder Paste
  • Lead Free Solder Temperature
  • Lead Free Soldering
  • Lead Free Wave Soldering
  • Leadfree Solder
  • Led Solder
  • Liquid Flux
  • Low Alpha
  • Marketing Communications
  • Metallization Paste
  • NanoBond
  • NanoFoil
  • Nanotechnology
  • No Clean Flux
  • No Clean Solder
  • No Clean Solder Paste
  • No Lead Solder
  • Package On Package
  • Paste Flux
  • Paste Soldering
  • Pb Free
  • PB Free Solder
  • Phase Change Material
  • Pin Transfer
  • Pop Flux
  • Pop Solder Paste
  • Preform Manufacturer
  • Preform Price
  • Reflow Solder
  • Rework
  • Rework Flux
  • Ribbon Solder
  • RMA Flux
  • RoHS
  • SAC Solder
  • SAC305
  • SAC305 Solder
  • SACX0307
  • Semiconductor Packaging
  • Silver Lead Free Solder
  • Silver Solder Paste
  • Silver Tin Alloy
  • SMT Solder
  • SMT Solder Paste
  • SOLAR
  • Solder
  • Solder Alloy
  • Solder and Flux
  • Solder Bar
  • Solder Basics
  • Solder Bumping
  • Solder Cream
  • Solder Defect
  • Solder Evaluation
  • Solder Joints
  • Solder Melting
  • Solder Metal
  • Solder Paste
  • Solder Paste Reflow
  • Solder Paste Syringe
  • Solder Preform
  • Solder Price
  • Solder Process
  • Solder Quality
  • Solder Reliability
  • Solder Sphere
  • Solder Stencil
  • Solder Suppliers
  • Solder Tin Lead
  • Solder Wires
  • Solder With Flux
  • Solderability
  • Soldering Assembly
  • Soldering Flux Paste
  • Soldering Fluxes
  • Soldering Lead Free Solder
  • Soldering Materials
  • Soldering Paste
  • Soldering Products
  • Spin Coating
  • Sputtering Target
  • Tabbing Ribbon
  • Tape And Reel
  • Thermal Interface Material
  • Thermal Management
  • Thin Film Technology
  • Tin and Lead Alloy
  • Tin Antimony Solder
  • Tin Gold Solder
  • Tin Lead Alloy
  • Tin Lead Phase Diagram
  • Tin Silver Solder
  • Tombstoning
  • Wave Solder
« View All Categories »

Recent Entries

The Perfect Sputtering Target Bond
by Jim Hisert on May 23
Bonded Sputtering Targets are a Bi-Metallic Assembly
by Jim Hisert on May 21
NanoBond® is a Fluxless Process
by Jim Hisert on May 16
The Right Climate Stuff Research Team Hits the Mark
by Dr. Ron Lasky on May 14
High Temperature (Braze Alloy) Sputtering Target Bonding, with NanoFoil®
by Jim Hisert on May 14
Material Safety Data Sheets
Product Data Sheets
ISO and ITAR
Online Store
Tech Team

Connect with Indium

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Blogger

+ Read our latest posts!

Americas

Utica, Chicago, Clinton
E-Mail: askus@indium.com
Phone: +1 315 853 4900

Asia/Pacific

Singapore, Cheongju
E-Mail: asiapac@indium.com
Phone: +65 6268 8678

China (中国网站)

Suzhou, Shenzhen, Liuzhou
E-Mail: china@indium.com
Phone: +86 (0)512 628 34900

Europe

Milton Keynes, Torino
E-Mail: europe@indium.com
Phone: +44 (0)1908 580400

Regional/Local Sales Support
Technical Service & Support

  • Home
  • Online Store
  • ISO and ITAR
  • Corporate
  • Tech Documents
  • MSDS
  • About Us
  • Jobs