Indium Corporation Blogs

It is no secret that automotive semiconductor customers are becoming increasingly demanding. The "under the hood / bonnet" electronics environment is arguably one of the most thermally stressful environments on the planet. Electronics close to the engine block can experience extremes ranging from frigid winter cold to tropical heat, with the added heat source of the adjacent internal combustion engine.

The moisture sensitivity level (MSL) standard from JEDEC / IPC was developed to cover the moisture-absorption and "popcorning" effects of polymeric overmolded materials, but has been expanded in usage to cover a variety of different packaging situations and failure modes. The standard does allow for a certain amount of delamination, even under the MSL1 conditions usually required by automotive semiconductor customers. However, now "zero tolerance for delam" is the most common request from automotive design engineers. In order to meet this need, both overmolding materials manufacturers and leadframe suppliers have been working on how to drive to zero delamination. Leadframe manufacturers have developed a variety of approaches to their products that enhance the adhesion between the leadframe metal itself and the overmolding compound. Usually, this takes the form of physical and chemical texturing of the copper, using a process such as brown oxide formation.

It is no surprise that this need for adhesion enhancement (AE) drives leadframe treatments that are antithetical to the need for formation of void-free, high conductivity electrical connections between the die and the leadframe - basically, it messes with the solderability of the preform or solder paste. In order to get around this issue, leadframe manufacturers have increasingly moved to the use of spot-plating of silver onto copper, with thicknesses ranging from 2-9microns. Why is the silver so thick, in comparison to silver sputtering onto the die surface? Simply because copper diffuses very quickly into the silver, so a thicker silver layer leads to a longer shelf-life for the leadframe. Note also that plating does not have as good process control as sputtering, but it is a lot cheaper and faster.

You can see (below) a schematic of solder paste printed onto one of these leadframes.

An emerging failure mode is one of incomplete wetting onto the leadframe, leading to failures at the sites where solder has failed to flow over the silver plated area completely - "delamination sites" - (below). The flat, shiny, silver finish is not a suitable surface for overmolding compounds to bond to.

So why isn't the solder wetting well? The answer becomes clear pretty quickly when you do some back-of-the-envelope calculations of the expected final silver content of the finished joint. Let's assume some bondline thicknesses (BLT) is (25,75microns) of a solder containing 2.5%Ag (such as Indalloy 151 or 163) and the plating thickness is (3-9)microns. Typical plating thicknesses of 2-9microns may be seen, based on a recent customer survey), with a mean around 3microns.

So what is the silver content of the final joint, assuming all the silver is dissolved?

The calculations, therefore, show that it is from 6 to 27% silver. The 27% level is well beyond the solubility limit of silver in these types of solder, and in fact in most solders, at the expected soldering temperatures. The mechanism of non-wetting is clear: solder can no longer wet onto silver, once it has become filled with insoluble intermetallic particles.

The message to power semiconductor component suppliers is:

• Maintain the silver thickness at a consistent, low level: set up tighter specifications on the silver spot-plating from your supplier.
• Update your incoming quality control inspection so you can be sure you are getting what you paid for in terms of thickness of silver and consistency.
• Manage leadframe inventory so you run leaner, so you do not run into leadframe lifetime issues with copper diffusing through the thin silver layer and oxidizing (solderability / voiding problems).

You do have an alternative (moving to an alternate solder type), but then you are into a lengthy requalification procedure.

As always, please contact me if you need assistance.

Cheers!  Andy

Folks,

I was at APEX 2013 San Diego this past week.  San Diego is a great venue for the show, but I always forget how cold it can be (55-65°F) this time of year.  The folks at iConnect 007 interviewed me at the show; the topic was lead-free reliability and has cost for consumer electronics been demonstrated.  You can see the interview here.

These are topics I think about often, so let’s discuss them a bit. First, let’s consider reliability.  RoHS was enacted on 01 July 2006, more than 6 ½ years ago.  Each year more than $1 trillion-worth of electronics are made, therefore, in this period of time, something over $3 trillion worth of consumer electronics have been manufactured.  There have been no “the sky is falling”-type of reliability issues in this time.  How can I say this?  Well, my office at the Thayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth is across the hall from the IT (information Technology) Dept.  They purchase all of the millions of dollars worth of PCs, printers, displays etc. that Thayer uses.  Several years ago (say early 2011) I stopped by when most of the department was in and cheerfully asked if the reliability of the equipment they purchase has gone down since lead-free assembly was enacted.  They asked me in unison, “What’s lead-free assembly.”  After I explained what lead-free assembly was, they confirmed that they have noticed no changes in reliability.  Since RoHS, my family has purchase about 100+ electronic devices, a few have had reliability problems, about as many as in the past.  Most were attributed to hard drive fails.  Of the scores of friends and colleagues I have, no one has ever commented that they have noticed an increase in electronics fails. So, my conclusion is that consumer product reliability is not "practically" worse if my family and  these many  other folks haven’t noticed it.

I have made an informal study of reliability data of lead-free vis-a-vis tin-lead solders published in papers.  A statement from Rockwell Collin’s JCAA/JGF-PP No Lead solder Project: -55C-125C Thermal Cycle Testing Final Report  sums up my overview conclusion nicely: “Test vehicles assembled with lead-free materials (notably tin-silver-copper) exhibited lower reliability under some test conditions.”  Nay sayers might be quick to suggest that this statement  says that lead-free is no good.  However, the statement could be reworded to say: “In considerably more than half of the test conditions, test vehicles assembled with lead-free materials had higher reliability." Counting the comparisons in the Rockwell Collins paper shows lead-free better in 51 cases, tin-lead better in 31 cases, and one draw.  However, it is disturbing that a small percentage of lead-free assembled test vehicles had much much worse reliability than tin-lead test vehicles.  This later information makes me believe that lead-free is not yet ready for mission-critical, high-reliability, long-life products.  These small numbers of much poorer reliability assemblies must be understood and corrected before lead-free is ready for mission-critical prime time.  The much shorter life cycle of today’s consumer electronics may also mask this concern.

What about cost?  I don’t at all want to minimize the expense that many went through to go lead-free and RoHS compliant.  In about 2007, one of our colleagues estimated that it cost the electronics industry $20 billion to become RoHS compliant.  I think this number is low, but, from a consumer’s perspective, there has been no cost hardship.  The price of a PC continued to go down during and after RoHS implementation, as shown in the figure below.  While performing my non-scientific survey of co-workers, family, and friends on reliability, I also asked about cost.  All agreed, electronics are cheaper than ever.

Challenges still exist, even in consumer electronics with the Head-in-Pillow, Graping, non wet opens, and other defects.  However, we can all purchase lead-free, RoHS compliant products at a reasonable cost and reliability.

Cheers,

Dr. Ron

The source for the image is :http://thomaslah.wordpress.com/2010/02/03/apple-and-intel-defying-gravity/

Folks,

Our discussion of Weibull Analysis continues.....Let’s say you have worked hard and assembled some SMT lead-free PCBs for thermal cycle testing.  You used the best lead-free solder paste, and some lead-free solder preforms as you assembled several through-hole components with the Pin-in Paste process.  You were a little concerned with the assembly process as the board was thermally and physically massive and the reflow process needed to be a bit above the recommended temperature and time.

The results of the thermal cycle testing are shown in Figure 1 below.  You dutifully report the characteristic life (or scale) as 2,387 cycles and the first fail at 300 cycles.  You were quite disappointed, as in the past similar, but slightly smaller boards, had a slightly higher scale, but more importantly, the first fail was about 1,000 cycles.  Anyway, you write you report up and file it away.

Figure 1. A Weibull Plot of the Thermal Cycle Data

Hold on!  The data are screaming at you the something is going on.  Look at the same data in Figure 2.  Note two distinct lines shown in green.  These two separate lines suggest very strongly that there are multiple failure modes.  The line furthest to the right is likely the typical failure mode observed in the past.  The line to the left is a new early failure mode.  It could be due to something like oxidized pads or some other phenomena not seen when testing similar but smaller boards.  Root cause failure analysis should be performed to try and understand to new failure mode.

Figure 2. A Weibull Plot of the Thermal Cycle Data with Multiple Failure Modes Noted

Now for a human interest note:

One of the rewarding aspects of being a professor at Dartmouth is the outstanding nature of many of the students.  They are not just good academically, but often are talented artistically, athletically, etc.  This point was brought home to me recently.  In a class I teach, ENGS 1: The Technology of Everyday Things, we were recently discussing the conservation of angular momentum (CoAM).  One of the most striking ways to demonstrate CoAM is an ice skater’s spin.  I went on the internet and could not find a good video of a spin.  I then remembered that one of my former students, Julia Zaskorski was on Dartmouth’s figure skating team.  I asked her if she had a video she could share.  It appears below.  She is a materials science and physics major.  Who knows, maybe we will see her at APEX or SMTAI in a few years. 

Here is a little bio in her own words:

               My name is Julia Zaskorski, and I’m a junior from Wellesley College taking part in the 12 College Exchange Program at Dartmouth.  At Wellesley I am majoring in physics with the intent to pursue mechanical engineering.  Despite Wellesley’s relationship with nearby MIT, Wellesley does not have its own engineering program, so I sought out the more self-contained curriculum and atmosphere at the Thayer School of Engineering.  In addition to the draw of the Thayer School, the Dartmouth Figure Skating team was also a hugely motivating factor for my exchange, as Wellesley does not have a team, let alone a rink.  I have known the coach of the Dartmouth team for several years now, and to finally see my name on the roster for the team is a dream come true.  The engineers, as well as the winter activities here in Hanover, pulled my heart to Dartmouth long before I’d ever set foot on campus. 

  Cheers,

  Dr .Ron                           

Folks,

In continuing our discussion on Weibull Analysis, let’s assume we assembled some SMT and through-hole PCBs with lead-free solder paste.  On this board are also some bottom-side terminated (BTC) components (often called QFNs), that are also assembled with solder preforms.  A stress test is performed to test the BTCs.  In such a test, the first fail in Weibull analysis is the most important data point.  No matter the results of remainder of the data, these later fails cannot undo the effect of a very early first fail. 

To understand this concept, let’s look at the Weibull chart below.  In many high reliability applications, there may be a requirement that some small percentage of the components under test have at least some minimum reliability.

Figure 1.  Weibull Analysis with an Early Fail.

As an example, let’s say that 1% of the components cannot have less than 500 cycles of life.  By looking at Figure 1, we see that 1% have less than 150 cycles of life (see arrow.)  This one early outlier dramatically affects the Weibull Analysis.

However, if that outlier was removed, as seen in Figure 2, the data suggest that 1% of the components will have a life of 900 cycles.  We can see the dramatic effect the first fail has on this result.  Note that the first fail does not affect the “scale” or characteristic life much (2647 vs 2682).  Hence, the characteristic life, is not a robust metric to use in a high reliability environment.  However, the shape or slope is dramatically affected by the early fail as it changes from 2.22 to 4.23 when the early fail is “censored.” 

Figure 2. Weibull Analysis with the Early Fail Removed (Censored).

Why might an outlier like this exist?  Almost certainly there is something unusual about the early fail.  It might be something like an oxidized pad preventing good wetting of the solder.  Perhaps something like this failure mode might be discovered in root cause failure analysis.  However, I am typically opposed to censoring data, even with supportive failure analysis.  I think the test should be done over.  It is often too easy to talk yourself into accepting inconclusive failure analysis.

What is your opinion?

Cheers,

Dr. Ron

Over the years, solder alloy choices have been pretty stable.  In the last century, SN63 and SN62 could be found at any company making any kind of electronic device, and both alloys were the backbone of every company making solders.

But, when lead was identified as causing health issues, it was legislated out of everything from paint to gasoline to electronics, including solders.  In 2003, RoHS (Restriction of Hazardous Substances) was passed in Europe to restrict the use of lead (as well as mercury, cadmium, hexavalent chromium, and polybrominated diphenyl ethers: PBDE) in electronics and electronic equipment.

The electronics industry is now focused on SAC alloys (so named because they contain Sn, Ag, and Cu).  But, there is also SnAg, which was used in the lead era when a higher melting point was required.  The addition of the copper (in SAC) offers the benefit of improving wetting and potentially reducing the silver content from a non-copper alloy like 96.5Sn 3.5Ag. 

But, there are many applications where SnAg works well. Changing from it would require customer and/or government approval, and that involves a lot of extra money and time. This lead-free alloy works well in the assembly of a variety of medical devices that use non-traditional metallizations and fluxes.  The Cu addition (in a SAC alloy) probably would not improve the results enough to warrant the cost of requalifying an existing medical device through government agencies, so they stay with what works. 

So, if you are using 96.5Sn 3.5Ag (or 96Sn 4Ag), don't be afraid to stick with it.  Indium Corporation offers both of these solder alloys (and over 250 other alloys) in a variety of forms: preforms, wire, paste, and ribbon.   And, if you want to look at the SAC alloy family to see if it works better in your application, we will help you with that, too.  Just contact our Application Engineering Staff for help.

Carol

I’m just back from Malaysia, where I visited one of our larger customers who has been using our high-lead (high-Pb) dispensable NC-SMQ75 solder paste for many years. No surprises there, but what many people don’t realize is that the NC-SMQ75 solder paste can be used as a no-clean material in many power die-attach applications. I [ACM] spoke to my friend SzePei Lim [SPL], our Area Technical Manager, based in Kuala Lumpur, about the revolutionary NC-SMQ75 paste:

[ACM] Please tell me about NC-SMQ75. What makes it a unique material?

[SPL] Indium's NC-SMQ75 no-clean die-attach solder paste is one of an emerging class of materials from Indium Corporation based on “ULR” (ultra-low residue) fluxes: these have residue levels of 4% or less after  reflow. NC-SMQ75 leaves only about 4%, by weight, of flux: therefore around 0.4%, by weight, of a 90%w/w metal solder paste. This is the lowest residue solder paste we know of that is widely used in the power semiconductor assembly industry. NC-SMQ75 no-clean solder paste is our best seller in the die-attach application on leadframes for power devices, such as clip-on-leadframe and leadframe-based clip-bonded stacked die. It can be applied by either dispensing or printing, and can be reflowed under either a forming gas or a nitrogen environment.

[ACM] What does “no-clean” mean in high-temperature power semiconductor die-attach applications? They are very different from standard no-clean solder paste usages.

[SPL] There are some big differences: the current flow in power semiconductors is vertical (from top to bottom or vice versa), rather than between adjacent conductors, like in surface mount technology (SMT), plus the package is overmolded with a solid-filled epoxy-based material.

A high voltage and thin die therefore combine to give a significant field strength across the die. A ULR flux with benign, hard residues and low resistivity (good electrical properties) is, therefore, critical. This type of residue also allows for good bonding to the overmolding compound, to prevent delamination during thermal cycling and MSL testing. Customers using this paste in no-clean applications report that, once the reflow profile has been optimized to minimize both voiding and residue levels, the final overmolded component is suitable for use in many different type of application, including automotive.

[ACM] Is there a tradeoff between a ULR no-clean solder paste and reduced voiding?

[SPL] A customer has to be careful to optimize their reflow profile to minimize voiding. That is true for the ULR pastes as well as other types. However, NC-SMQ75 has repeatedly proven itself to be able to reflow with less than 5% total voids in many smaller die applications, especially those less than 10 x 10mm.

[ACM] Solder pastes typically “spit” badly when reflowed, leaving undesirable flux spatter on wirebonding pads. Is it possible to use this as a no-clean paste even in a wirebonded application?

[SPL] Yes. Perhaps surprisingly, these ultra low residue characteristics enable NC-SMQ75 to be used as a true no-clean solder paste, even in the power die-attach application where subsequent steps include  wire-bonding. We have experience with several customers, where the design and placement of the paste deposit can be optimized to minimize the issue of flux spitting onto wirebond pads. And we can provide guidance where needed. This usually works best in applications where there are fewer than 5 wirebond pads per component. 

[ACM] Are there any special precautions that need to be taken when evaluating the NC-SMQ75 for no-clean power applications?

[SPL] Power semiconductor device types are undergoing rapid evolution, as the electrical demands of the devices drive customers away from thin wirebonds towards more robust copper-clip-based applications. Die are also becoming thinner: down to 50 microns, in some cases. As with all applications where there is no single set of applicable industry standard test methods, large-scale testing of multiple batches of components and paste batches is recommended, to establish sufficient data to allow clear decisions to be made on the usefulness of the solder paste in the final assembly process.

Occasional incompatibility with a specific type of semiconductor die may be seen, but it is something that we know about as a rare issue. Indium Corporation technical personnel can assist during the evaluation process, to guide customers on what to look out for. Additionally, I, and several of my colleagues, have extensive experience using NC-SMQ75 in no-clean die-attach applications. The compatibility of the final reflowed flux residue with different types of overmolding compounds is usually very good, with the Sumitomo G700 series appearing to be one of the best types, although Hitachi, Panasonic, and others may also be suitable.

Customers using a standard convection oven modified for high-temp applications need to ensure the N₂  flow rate is stable and that there is a controlled, low-ppm oxygen level throughout the oven.

[ACM] I understand that there are new, lower voiding, ultralow residue, no-clean pastes being developed for power semiconductor devices: is that true?

[SPL] Yes, our US- and China-based research and development teams, led by Dr Ning-Cheng Lee, are developing even more solder pastes for no-clean die-attach in this market. Some of these may also be applicable for our new HTPbF (high-temperature lead-free) drop-in die-attach paste, the BiAgX material, but that is still a few months away from implementation.

SzePei, thank you for teaching us. Many thanks for your gift of mooncake last month, and please enjoy your Zhongqiu celebration! 

Folks,

There is a lot of interest in cleaning PCBs that have been assembled with no-clean solder pastes. 

Recently I discussed the topic with my good friend Mike Bixenman of Kyzen.

Dr. Ron (DR)

Mike, many of the best performing lead-free and lead containing solder pastes today are no-cleans.  They have been designed to solve assembly problems like graping and the head-in-pillow defect.  For the vast majority of applications, the small amount of residue left by a no-clean is not a problem.  However, some assemblers want the performance of no-cleans, but need to clean the no-clean residue as they have extreme reliability or cosmetic requirements.  Are there cleaning solutions for these situations?

Mike Bixenman (MB)

Absolutely!

DR

Can you tell use a little bit about these cleaning solutions?

MB

Several factors come into consideration when engineering electronics assembly cleaning agents. Design factors include the soil make-up, heat exposure, Z-axis clearance under bottom termination components, material compatibility, and cleaning equipment. Typical process goals require that all flux be removed in one cleaning cycle, shiny solder joints (no chemical attack to the alloy), fast production speed, no material effect to labels and other materials of construction, long chemistry bath life, and low operating concentrations.  

Cleaning solutions vary depending on the cleaning equipment. For solvent systems, a solvent cleaning agent is needed - with properties that allow for non-flammability, constant boiling mixture, and being environmentally-friendly to workers and the environment. For solvent cleaning agents that are rinsed with water, the cleaning agent requires a solvent mixture that can be rinsed with water while matching up to the soil and cleaning equipment. For aqueous cleaning agents, the cleaning agent is engineered with properties that provide solvency for the soil, polarity for inducing a dipole and/ or to oxidize and reduce the soil, low surface tension to reduce the wetting angle, buffers to stabilize pH, defoaming to reduce the tendency to foam at high pressures, and inhibitors to widen the passivation range on metallic alloys.

The property most critical is the nature of the soil. As soldering temperatures rise and the time exposed to higher temperatures increase, solder paste material supplies must improve the oxygen barrier and prevent flux burn out. This requires higher molecular weight compositions that may change the nature of the soil and the cleaning solution needed to remove the soil. Other factors such as processing conditions and how these conditions can change the soil’s cleaning properties must be considered. For example, excessive exposure to heat may polymerize the flux residue rending the soil uncleanable. To better understand and plan for these factors, solubility testing and matching the cleaning agent to the soil assist formulators in designing cleaning agents that are effective on a wide range of soldering material residues.

DR

What type of equipment is typically needed?

MB

Two key factors must be matched to clean:

1: Potential energy of the cleaning agent for the soil and

2: Kinetic energy of cleaning machine for delivering the cleaning agent to the soil necessary to create a flow channel needed to rapidly displace the soil.  

The cleaning machine requires energy to deliver the cleaning fluid across a distance and create enough force to deflect fluids under the Z-Axis. The capillary attraction for moving the cleaning fluid into an out of tight gaps is created by fluid flow, spray impingement pressure and surface tension effects. When cleaning under tight standoffs, cleaning agents that wet (form small droplets) improves capillary action, penetration and wetting of the residue. The solubility rate is dependent on the soil, temperature effects and concentration of the cleaning agent needed to dissolve the soil. Hard soils clean at a slower rate and remove the soil in a concentric (tunneling effect) manner. Soft soils clean at a fast rate and remove the soil in a channeling (multiple tunnels) effect.

The Z-Axis gap height has a direct correlation to the energy required to penetrate and remove the soil under components, time required to clean the soil and wash temperature. The irony is that lower Z-axis gaps increase capillary action of the flux for underfilling the bottom side of the component. When this occurs, flux residue dams up and closes any flow channels under the component. Research findings indicate that high pressure coherent spray jets are needed since energy drop is less and defective energy is higher. The wash time needed to clean under a 1-2 mil gap as compared to a 4-6 mil gap can range from 4-8 times longer. Higher wash temperatures increase the softening effect and aid in penetrating and removing the soil. The net effect is that, as components decrease in size, the Z-Axis gap height reduces and the cleaning factors needed to clean the soil increase. These effects favor spray-in-air cleaning equipment over immersion cleaning equipment.

DR

How are the results of cleaning assessed, so that we know that the boards are truly clean?

MB

The first level that we judge cleaning performance by is the visual presence of the residue post cleaning. Most cleaning processes have no problem with removing surface residue from the assembly. The issue is the residue under the bottom side of the component. This complicates the issue since the residue under a specific component is where most failures occur. These site-specific failures may reduce the confidence in existing IPC standards that correlate anion and cation ionic residues over the entire board surface area. So, when designing the cleaning process, we use test cards with bottom termination components and judge cleaning performance by the level of flux residue remaining under those components. To achieve this value, all components are removed and the surface area of the residue under components is graded and statistically analyzed.

Let me finish by adding that highly dense interconnects assembled onto circuit boards is advancing at a rapid pace. Traditional SMT component spacing between conductors was larger. No-clean post soldering residues posed minimal risks to reliability. The information age has spoiled us in expecting higher functionality in smaller spaces. As assembles reduce in size and increase the levels of functionality, cleaning becomes more important.  I hope that the cleaning factors discussed in this interview provide insight into cleaning process design considerations that may be of help.

DR

Mike, thanks.  Who should folks contact if they would like more information on cleaning boards assembled with no-clean solder pastes.

MB

Thanks for letting me share with your readers.   I would be glad to help anyone with the cleaning challenges they face.  Contact me at mikeb@kyzen.com.

Cheers,

Dr. Ron 

Folks,

I’m taking a few moments from Wassail Weekend , held annually in my village, Woodstock VT, “The prettiest small town in America”, to write a post about last week’s workshops at ACI.

Indium colleague Ed Briggs and I gave a 3 hour presentation on “Lead-Free Assembly for High Yields and Reliability.” I think Ed’s analysis of “graping” and the “head-in-pillow” defect is the best around. 

There was quite a bit of discussion on the challenges faced by solder paste flux in the new world of lead-free solder paste and miniaturized components (i.e. very small solder paste deposits.) One of the hottest topics was nitrogen and lead-free SMT assembly. There seemed to be uniform agreement that solder paste users should be able to demand that their lead-free solder paste perform well with any PWB pad finish (e.g. OSP Immersion silver, electroless nickel gold, etc.) without the use of nitrogen. Not only does using nitrogen cost money, but it will usually make tombstoning worse. However, in the opinion of most people, nitrogen is a must for wave soldering and, since it minimizes dross development, it likely pays for itself.

After Ed and I finished, Fred Dimock, of BTU, gave one of the best talks I have ever experienced on reflow soldering. He discussed thermal profiling in detail, including the importance of assuring that thermocouples are not oxidized (when oxidized they lose accuracy). He also discussed a reflow oven design that minimizes temperature overshoot during heating, and undershoot when the heater is off. Understanding these topics is critical with the tight temperature control that many lead-free assemblers face.

Fred Verdi of ACI finished the meeting with an excellent presentation on “Pb-free Electronics for Aerospace and Defense.” Fred’s talk discussed the work that went into the “Manhattan Project.” A free download of the entire project report is available.

There appears to be agreement that acceptable lead-free reliability has been established for consumer products with lifetimes of 5 years or so, but not for military/aerospace electronics where lifetimes can be up to 40 years in harsh service conditions. These vast product lifetime and consequences of failure differences are depicted in the Fred's chart (above). Commercial products are in quadrant A and military/aerospace products in quadrant D.

One of the greatest risks faced by quadrant D products is tin whiskers. Fred spent quite a bit of time discussing this interesting phenomenon. One of the challenges of this risk is that there is no way to accelerate it, so you can’t do an equivalent test to accelerated thermal cycling or drop shock. Fred mentioned that there have now been verified tin whisker fails, the Toyota accelerator mechanism being a confirmed one.

In addition to tin whiskers, lead-free reliability for quadrant D products (with a service life of up to 40 years) in thermal cycle and other areas remains a concern.  I mention that tin pest was not on the list of issues for this quadrant.

Fred and the Manhattan Project Team have identified many "gaps" that need to be addressed to determine and mitigate the risk of lead-free assembly for quadrant D products.  They plan to start this approximately $100M program in 2013.

For those that missed this free workshop, ACI host Mike Prestoy is planning another one in 6 months.

Cheers,

Dr. Ron

• High thermal conductivity (33W/mK)
• Higher melting point than SAC alloys (221C)
• Low tensile stress, so suitable for large die (5800psi)
• Excellent thermal cycling properties (-55 to 125C)

1.  Preform (a specially-shaped solder piece) with TACflux® used to hold the preform and die in place
2.  Solder paste, which holds the die in place with no extra materials added 
3.  Soft solder die-attach wire, a fluxless type of solder wire, which is melted onto the substrate metallization under an inert cover gas, and the die directly mounted onto the molten solder pool, then allowed to cool.

Folks,

Here is an interesting turn of events related to the reliability of lead-free (Pb-free) soldering reliability. 

I was reminded recently by something Carl Sagan said, or, actually, did not say: Billions and Billions Although this term is strongly associated with him, he never said it. Sagan believed that this term was connected to him because Johnny Carson mimicked him and used the term.

 
Although not even close to being in Sagan's league, I find that I am now equally unfairly associated with the term,  "lead-free solder is a grand success." This came about in an interview by Rob Speigel, which he summarized in a blog post.

In reading Speigel's post, you will see that,  "lead-free solder is a grand success," is Rob’s term, not mine. Well, Rob's post resulted in a string of postings on IPC’s Technet .

One person opined:

Irresponsible statements like "lead-free solder is a grand success" should NOT be ignored. Those who make such statements in the face of all of the contrary evidence should be noted, and treated as motivated only by greed. Lead-free soldering certainly has been known for many "thousand$" of successes.

I have learned that it is not even worth the bother to refute such statements with those who make them. It may be a "grand success" for PhDs who contract to solder paste companies, but it certainly has not been a "grand success" to literally thousands of companies dealing with the reliability elephant sitting in the room getting larger by the day, and the associated fallout as a result.

Ouch!

Another shared:

I disagree with the stated and implied affect of RoHS, on PWBs expressed in this article. Lead free assembly reduces reliability by 50%. There can be no doubt about that. There are too many studies that confirm lead free assembly significantly degrades reliability. There are so many studies that demonstrate a reduction in reliability that Rod's contention is almost laughable. We are now faced with increased failures of copper interconnections and dielectric material due to high assembly temperatures. There is an increase in crazing that can support CAF, significant copper dissolution, and cratering in assembly, Switching to lead free in most HDI applications is a significant challenge. Lead free assembly has a profound affect by degrading PWB's organic component (epoxy) due the temperature required and copper interconnection and also the exaggeration of the z-axis expansion of the dielectric.

I have asked for copies of the many reliability studies referred to. No response yet.

Finally someone hit the heart of the matter:

I'm curious if "grand success" were Dr.Lasky's words or Rob Spiegel's editorializing. Lasky does mention the lack of long term results, and Speigel, in the comments,  enumerates a number of reliability problems. ISTM that neither truly believes  those words.

Correct!, Thanks. 

Here was my response that I posted on Technet:

Folks,

Pete is correct. I never said lead-free implementation was a grand success. These were Rob's words in his blog post. 

I have said repeatedly that adequate lead-free reliability has been demonstrated for consumer products like mobile phones, PCs, portable electronics with service lives less than 5 years. This level of reliability has been demonstrated in numerous studies and more importantly with field data. Vahid Goudarzi, of Motorola, stated that field reliability of lead-free assembled mobile phones has been equal or better than leaded assembly units. His data go back to 2001 (not 2006. Motorola started early for reasons discussed below).

 The reason Motorola shipped early with lead-free products is due to the fact that lead-free solder does not spread as well. Because of this poorer spreading, Motorola was able to decrease lead spacings without getting shorts, thus increasing the amount of electrical function in a smaller space. Since increased function in a smaller space is the defining attribute of portable electronics, the importance of this lead-free advantage cannot be overstated. Admittedly, lead-free's poorer wetting is a challenge in other regards, especially hole fill in wave soldering, but the Motorola Droid X2 could not be assembled with leaded solder, there would be too many shorts. Since the packaging density of the iPhone and similar devices is on a par with the Droid X2, I suspect this statement is true for most mobile products.

I have also repeatedly stated that lead-free reliability for long term service, mission critical devices has not been demonstrated. As a result, these types of devices should not consider lead-free solder at this date.

I regularly discuss these topics in my blog (http://blogs.indium.com/blog/an-interview-with-the-professor). The most recent post shows a striking photo of leaded solders spreading -which is too "good" for portable electronics.

Cheers,

Dr, Ron

Example:

Figure 1: Example shown Indium8.9 flux with SAC lead-free alloy

The reason for approaching this subject is that often there has been some confusion in regards to the difference between max slope (a category reported on most profiling software) and the ramp rate listed on a data sheet.
























Figure 2: Max Slope

The max slope is very often attained in the first zone as the PCB moves from ambient temperature into the oven. In most cases the oven zone setting for the first zone is 100°C or better. The change in temperature between ambient and the first zone then is a minimum of 75°C (assuming 25°C as ambient) and so it’s easy to see that the greatest change in temperature (max slope) in most cases is typically found in the first zone

The focus of max slope is more from a component view point, to avoid thermal shock, usually 3°C/s is recommended as the upper limit

Figure 3: Ramp or Average Rate


The ramp rate may be better described as the rate (change in temperature over time) from ambient (room temperature) to peak. And is more practically used in a ramp to spike type profile

From the view point of the solder paste, the lower the ramp rate the better, usually 1-2°C/s. This is to drive off volatiles and help minimize solder defects such as solder balling, solder beading, and tombstoning. This rate becomes even more important as the solder paste deposit continually decreases in size, as we move to 0201’s and smaller discrete components and from 0.5mm pitch area array packages to 0.4mm and smaller. Due to this miniaturization, the observance of graping and head-in-pillow have become more common. The reflow process window is becoming very narrow and this attribute (ramp rate) has become as important as time above liquidus and peak temperature.

I'd love to discuss this with you, if this topic is affecting your SMT process. If you'd like, feel free to contact me.

Folks,

When the industry was preparing to transition to lead-free solders almost ten years ago (can it have been that long), tin-bismuth solders were serious candidates. Their low melting point, of about 138C, made these solders interesting candidates to replace tin-lead solder. However, if contaminated with lead, tin-bismuth solders can produce a eutectic phase that melts at 96C. In such situations the resulting solder joint exhibits poor performance in thermal cycle testing. Since early in the transition to lead-free solders it was expected that there would be numerous components and PWBs with lead-based surface finishes, this property made tin-bismuth solders unacceptable.

Another aspect of tin-bismuth solders is that they expand on cooling. This phenomenon can result in fillet lift in through-hole solder joints.

However, as we are now well into 2011, almost no components or PWBs have lead-containing finishes and many portable electronic devices have no through-hole components, so it may be time to reconsider tin-bismuth for some applications.

Some years ago, Hewlett Packard (HP) had performed work to show that adding 1% silver to tin-bismuth solder enabled this alloy to outperform eutectic tin-lead solder in 0 to 100C thermal cycle testing. Even at these low reflow temperatures, HP demonstrated solder joint strength with SAC BGA solder balls that was 65% that of tin-lead solder. Expanding on this work, Indium Corporation's Ed Briggs and Brook Sandy performed stencil printing and reflow experiments consistent with the requirements of current miniaturized components using this 57Bi-42Sn-1Ag solder. All of their results were promising. Ed presented a paper at SMTA Toronto,summarized the Hewlett Packard work, and reviewed the results of this new work.

So for applications consistent with 0-100C thermal cycling, 57Bi-42Sn-1Ag solder may be something to consider if the high temperature of SAC solder paste is an issue to components or PWBs in a product

Cheers,

Dr. Ron 

PS: Read my follow-on posting about bismuth.

Folks,

I thought I would take a stab at listing the minuses, pluses, and “it’s a wash” aspects of assembling with lead-free (LF) solder. Here are my first thoughts. Please tell me what I missed or disagree.

Cheers,

Dr. Ron

Minuses

1.    Pb-Free requires higher reflow temperatures
The Tm for LF solders, in the 217-229C range, has created numerous challenges:

a.      PWB warpage and damage

b.      Component damage

c.      New defect modes such as graping and head-in-pillow defects (although concurrent reduction in solder paste deposit sizes for 0201 and 01005 passives and 0.3 mm CSPs also exacerbate these defects)

d.      Defects related to increased oxidation

e.      Increases in voiding

f.       Increases in tombstoning

2.      The higher cost of LF solder, mostly for wave soldering

a.      It’s not just the silver, tin is much more expensive than lead

3.      Poorer wetting of LF solders, creating the most significant challenges in wave soldering

4.      More rapid copper pad dissolution on PWBs in wave soldering

5.      LF solder attack of wave solder machine components

6.      LF reliability in harsh thermal cycle testing appears poorer than tin-lead solders

7.      Tin Whiskers

It’s a Wash

1.      Short-term reliability in consumer product-type environments

2.      Protection of the environment if discarded products are improperly disposed of

a.      Lead in electronics has never been shown to cause a problem in land fills

3.      Since July 2006, about $3 trillion of products have been manufactured with LF solder, with no “the sky is falling”-type of problems

Pluses

1.      LF solder's poor wetting enables finer lead spacings (see photo Courtesy of Motorola)

a.      It may be argued that some modern electronic products (e.g. smartphones) could not be made with tin-lead solder

2.      It is safer to recycle LF solders, especially if performed in a non-controlled environment

Jon major recently joined the Indium Corporation as a Product Manager for Solar back-end assembly products. I greeted him with this impromptu interview.

Jim: First of all Jon, welcome. It’s great to have you as a new addition to the team!

Jon: Thank you Jim – it’s an exciting time to be at Indium Corporation and a fantastic time to be a part of the growing solar industry. I am extremely enthusiastic about my new position and am looking forward to making a positive contribution to the solar industry.

Jim: I noticed it didn’t take you long to get up to speed. Your time in Silicon Valley must have helped.

Jon: Coming from the electronics industry with a focus on product development, new product introduction, manufacturing, and external partner management, I am excited that my past experiences can contribute both to the industry and to Indium Corporation. After joining Indium only a few weeks ago, not only am I getting used to Upstate NY weather, but I have been immersing myself in solar with the goal of gaining a comprehensive understanding of:

•       Both rigid and thin-film technologies

•       Technology trends

•       Global and regional markets (EU, China, US, North America)

•       Solar supply chain (Silicon, wafers, cells, module, equipment, inverters, integrators)

•       Equipment manufacturers, contract manufacturers, and how we can collaborate with them to move the industry forward

•       Our products and pricing

•       Our current and future customers

•       Our short and long term opportunities

•       Our competition

•       Our roadmap

•       Our strengths, weaknesses, and threats

•       Our manufacturing capabilities and our QA process

•       Our sales channels, value proposition, key differentiators

•       All Indium processes

Jim: I know you've got solar products on your mind. Let our readers know a little bit more about your role here at Indium?

Jon: As a Solar Backend Product Manager I will focus (officially) on the business development and growth of Indium’s Solar Back End product offerings.  Now that sounds great but what does it actually mean? I could cut and paste my official job description but I prefer to explain it in my own words. As I think about the first part of that statement, “business development and growth…”, I see my role as:

–      Know the market, the customers, the product, and the competition

–      Develop relationships with the Indium team, reps, partners, equipment manufacturers, and, of course, customers

–      Write valuable data sheets, publications, and sales literature

–      Listen to our customers' needs and provide solutions

–      Manage schedules and orders with minimal surprises

–      Build cross-functional collaboration (sales, distribution, marketing, engineering, R&D, QA, production, management)

–      Never let down partners or customers

–      Support all functions of the organization, both internal and external

–      Deliver above & beyond commitments

–      Make great bets – on technology, customers, and opportunities

–      Understand the product life-cycle

–      Ship high quality, consistent product

The second part of that statement “..of Indium’s Solar Back End product offerings” is fairly straightforward. Of course this means I will focus on Indium’s current back end products (tabbing ribbon, bus ribbon, metallization paste (or as I prefer to call it – “grid ink”), flux and flux cored wire). With a product development background, this also means I have an opportunity to work with customers, partners, and R&D to develop and bring new products to market that will advance the module assembly industry – very exciting for me personally.

Ultimately, I think of my role as both building awareness of Indium’s products and superior technical support available to our customers as well as helping to shape our growing industry.

Jim: Okay Jon, you’ve had a while to settle in and get familiar with our Solar Team’s past and present – what are you planning for the future of module assembly?

Jon: Regarding the future of module assembly it’s a bit early to know for sure but I am excited about our low-temperature bismuth-containing alloys. These low temperature, lead-free, bismuth-containing alloys reduce the soldering process temperatures, thus reducing thermal stresses. I’m also working with the Indium production team to further reduce our tabbing and bus ribbon yield strength. A lower yield strength will reduce mechanical stress on cells during the assembly process. This is crucial to minimizing the possibility of microcracks and cell breakage during the solar module assembly process.

In closing, having lived in California for the last 10 years, I am not 100% familiar with our Upstate New York climate, and especially not all the snow shoveling. I see in my future a solar powered driveway heater!

Jon can be reached at jmajor@indium.com

过去半年，因为某些国家的“宽松货币政策”大量印钞票，弄得和国际大宗商品的价格一路攀升。和我们行业直接相关的就是金属原材料的价格，特别是锡银铜的价格。

锡银铜是无铅合金的主要成分，虽然其中银在现在最常用的SAC305中只占3%，但是其价格的一路攀升，也使SAC305的金属成本价格随之一路狂飙！

为了更好为客户们提供具有成本优势(cost-effective)的可靠性强(reliable)的好用的焊接材料，Indium公司早就在低银合金上做了很多的研发，请看这里的相关Indium论文“Achieving High Reliability Low Cost Lead-Free SAC Solder Joints Via MN or CE Doping”

by Dr. Weiping Liu, Dr. Ning-Cheng Lee, Adriana Porras, Dr. Min Ding, Anthony Gallagher, Austin Huang, Scott Chen, Jeffrey Chan 

最近，我们的一些客户适用了Indium的SAC105 with Mn 焊锡膏（solder paste），发现其性能在各种应用上都表现良好(空焊盘，chip料，屏蔽罩，细IC间距，BGA等), 其印刷性，润湿性，爬锡，焊点的光亮度，BGA空洞的比例等，都和SAC305一样好或是十分接近。

更详细的资料或是信息，欢迎随时联系我们china@indium.com, askus@indium.com .

Cheers!

Pic:

1. www.kitco.com

2. Acknowledge to a South China customer; beta test pictures 

I just visited a customer that was converting from water soluble solder paste to no-clean. Not exactly a slam dunk transition as this customer found out.

During my visit, solder balls and solder beads were observed in the no-clean flux residue adjacent to discrete components (capacitor/resistors). These could potentially be a reliability concern…electrical shorts.

In water soluble processes, solder defects such as solder balling and beading can be washed away in the cleaning process…no worries. However, introducing a no-clean solder paste often requires that the process be “cleaned” up a bit. Here are some ways to do it:

STENCIL DESIGN:
My first step was to investigate the stencil design for these discrete components. Why? Because, since water soluble post-reflow residues (including solder balls & beads) are washed away, many customers will opt to place as much solder (1:1 ratio) as possible on the pads - to achieve a good solder joint. This is especially true for military or medical applications where a robust solder joint fillet is vital. However, because no-clean residues are typically not cleaned, the solder balls and solder beads remain in the flux residue and may produce electrical shorts.

When printing in a 1:1 ratio, especially if the stencil is thicker than average, solder paste is often pushed under the component and onto the solder mask during component placement. Upon reflow, the sub-component solder paste may not pull back into the solder joint. This is one way that solder balls/solder beads are produced.

No one wants to hear that they need to buy new stencils with reduced apertures, but I did recommend, in this case, that some aperture reduction be considered (generally down to 0402 components). Usually a 10-15% reduction, with home-plate or similar design, is common. Many stencil manufacturers are fully aware of the issue and can make suggestions on aperture designs.

REFLOW PROFILE:
Simultaneously, the reflow profile often needs to be adjusted. In the preheat portion of the typical reflow profile, the first few oven zones are used to drive off flux volatiles, making the paste less "mobile". A balance in the ramp rate is vital; too fast - and small “explosions” may cause paste to spatter into other areas; too slow - and two bad things happen: the flux will spread excessively and the flux activity can be exhausted.

Good Starting Points:

• Ramp rate (IMPORTANT: not max slope, see "Best Practices Reflow Profiling for Lead-Free SMT Assembly" for reference): 1°C/s
• Initial first zone setting: 100-110°C

Folks,

I was at SMTAI (Surface Mount Technology Association International) from September 24 and 27, 2010.   As I mentioned, I chaired a session on Alternative Alloys from 2:00-3:30PM on Tuesday 26^th.

At this session, Greg Henshall presented a paper on the Low Silver BGA Sphere Metallurgy Project. This paper was a collaborative effort of six companies. In addition, Richard Coyle presented an overview of the work of three companies entitled The Effect of Silver Content on the Solder Joint Reliability of a Pb-free PBGA Package. Both of these projects evaluated lead-free thermal cycle reliability as a function of silver content and compared the results to tin-lead reliability.

Both papers concluded that as far as thermal cycle reliability is concerned SnPb<SAC105<SAC305< SAC405. Coyle’s paper summed it up the best:

Each of the SAC alloys outperformed the SnPb eutectic alloy in every test including the long, 60 minute dwell time test. This tends to diminish the argument that SAC is less reliable than SnPb. (See Coyle’s figure. Data curves to the right are more reliable.)

Henshall’s paper also showed that the addition of dopants, to improve shock resistance, in SAC105 does not reduce thermal cycle life.

So, it appears, at this time, that, from a thermal cycle and drop shock perspective, it is looking more and more like SAC based solders out perform tin-lead solders in these two reliability arenas.

At the end of the session a noted lead-free curmudgeon came over to introduce himself.  We have had a jovial disagreement on several blogs etc. in the past re: lead-free status and issues, but had not met in person.   I should mention that this person is a college graduate, a former technical leader at several influential technological companies, and he owns a PE license. I asked him what he now thought about lead-free reliability after hearing the talks. He claimed that he is a little less likely to think that lead-free reliability is a disaster. He still refuses to purchase any lead-free products. He buys old units (pre-2006) on eBay.

I mentioned that over $2 trillion of electronics has been placed in the field since 2006 with no unusual reliability issues.   I then went on to say that a RoHS-compliant product is much more likely to fail due to a non-RoHS related issue. He did not disagree. So then I asked him why he won’t use RoHS compliant electronics. His answer: “I just don’t trust them.”

Cheers,