Lead Free Silver Solder

Folks,

I thought I would post a few short thoughts as the new year begins. Here it goes:

1.    A billion hours ago the stone-age was the future, a billion minutes ago Caesar ruled Rome, a billion seconds ago Jimmy Carter was President, a billion passives ago you took your last break (about 4 hours ago). As exciting as the latest quad core microprocessor is, the largest number of components that we assemble is passives, approaching two trillion per year. That is about 6 billion a day. If you lined up all of the 7 billion people in the world, each year you could give every man, woman and child several hundred passives from all of the passives that are produced. If two trillion passives (assume 0402s) were lined up end to end they would circle the earth 50 times!

2.    Schools in Indiana are no longer required to teach cursive writing. Key board skills are considered more important.  Yikes! I’m all for keyboard skills, but I want my grandkids to be able to write in cursive. If not, how do they write their names? Are we less than a generation away from people writing their names as an “X?”

3.    Thoughts on lead-free solder reliability in long term mission critical environments from a NASA study:

        “Test vehicles assembled with lead-free materials (notably tin-silver-copper) exhibited lower reliability under some test conditions.”

Some people would respond to this statement by saying, “I told you that lead-free solder was no good.” However, another way of stating the results would be, “Lead-free solder performed better in more tests than tin-lead solder did.” The ratio, by my count, was about 5 to 3 in favor of lead-free. However, I agree that lead-free is not ready for mission critical (>20-year) service life. The main reason being that, in some cases, when lead-free solder joints failed in these types of studies, the results were much, much worse than tin-lead solder joints. These failure modes need to be understood and addressed. In addition, tin whiskers and pad cratering are looming problems in these, mission critical, long service life quadrant D applications as discussed in the Navy's Manhattan Project (http://www.navyb2pcoe.org/pdf/LFEMP_book.pdf).

4.    SACM has arrived. SACM is a SAC105 alloy that is doped with manganese. Work performed on SACM by Liu, Lee, et al was reported in a May 2009 ECTC paper, Achieving High Reliability Low Cost Lead-Free SAC Solder Joints Via Mn Or Ce Doping. The thorough testing reported in this paper suggests that SACM has promise as a material candidate for quadrant D applications mentioned in #3. In explaining the superior performance of this material the authors state:

“The mechanism for high drop performance and high thermal cycling reliability can be attributed to a stabilized microstructure, with uniform distribution of fine IMC particles, presumably through the inclusion of Mn or Ce in the IMC.”

We have had to wait awhile for this material to become commercially available as it is a challenge to manufacture doped solders like this in large quantities.  I think this paper should be on you "must read" list.

5.   I had not planned on reading Steve Job’s biography , as I thought I knew quite a bit about him from reading recent articles in Forbes, Fortune and Business Week. But I went ahead and downloaded it to my Kindle anyway. This work by Walter Isaacson is a masterpiece. To share one tidbit from it that relates to those of us in electronic assembly: 

"In almost all cases electrical engineers first design the circuits that perform the functions of some device like a mobile phone or tablet. Mechanical Engineers are then left to fit the circuits into the “box.” (Hence MEs are often called “box stuffers” by EEs). Jobs completely changed this approach. He told the engineering team how he wanted the product to look and function first, then they had to determine how to make it work that way. I’m convinced that only through this approach are the revolutionary design concepts that Jobs and Apple came up with possible."

The book also points out his many flaws (e.g. Jobs would regularly park in handicap spots, the author reports several times that Jobs just didn’t think the rules applied to him, etc.). Another interesting thought (read it and see if you agree with me) that if Steve was not Paul Jobs' adopted son, Apple would have never happened.

Cheers,

Dr. Ron

Folks,

I’m taking a few moments from Wassail Weekend , held annually in my village, Woodstock VT, “The prettiest small town in America”, to write a post about last week’s workshops at ACI.

Indium colleague Ed Briggs and I gave a 3 hour presentation on “Lead-Free Assembly for High Yields and Reliability.” I think Ed’s analysis of “graping” and the “head-in-pillow” defect is the best around. 

There was quite a bit of discussion on the challenges faced by solder paste flux in the new world of lead-free solder paste and miniaturized components (i.e. very small solder paste deposits.) One of the hottest topics was nitrogen and lead-free SMT assembly. There seemed to be uniform agreement that solder paste users should be able to demand that their lead-free solder paste perform well with any PWB pad finish (e.g. OSP Immersion silver, electroless nickel gold, etc.) without the use of nitrogen. Not only does using nitrogen cost money, but it will usually make tombstoning worse. However, in the opinion of most people, nitrogen is a must for wave soldering and, since it minimizes dross development, it likely pays for itself.

After Ed and I finished, Fred Dimock, of BTU, gave one of the best talks I have ever experienced on reflow soldering. He discussed thermal profiling in detail, including the importance of assuring that thermocouples are not oxidized (when oxidized they lose accuracy). He also discussed a reflow oven design that minimizes temperature overshoot during heating, and undershoot when the heater is off. Understanding these topics is critical with the tight temperature control that many lead-free assemblers face.

Fred Verdi of ACI finished the meeting with an excellent presentation on “Pb-free Electronics for Aerospace and Defense.” Fred’s talk discussed the work that went into the “Manhattan Project.” A free download of the entire project report is available.

There appears to be agreement that acceptable lead-free reliability has been established for consumer products with lifetimes of 5 years or so, but not for military/aerospace electronics where lifetimes can be up to 40 years in harsh service conditions. These vast product lifetime and consequences of failure differences are depicted in the Fred's chart (above). Commercial products are in quadrant A and military/aerospace products in quadrant D.

One of the greatest risks faced by quadrant D products is tin whiskers. Fred spent quite a bit of time discussing this interesting phenomenon. One of the challenges of this risk is that there is no way to accelerate it, so you can’t do an equivalent test to accelerated thermal cycling or drop shock. Fred mentioned that there have now been verified tin whisker fails, the Toyota accelerator mechanism being a confirmed one.

In addition to tin whiskers, lead-free reliability for quadrant D products (with a service life of up to 40 years) in thermal cycle and other areas remains a concern.  I mention that tin pest was not on the list of issues for this quadrant.

Fred and the Manhattan Project Team have identified many "gaps" that need to be addressed to determine and mitigate the risk of lead-free assembly for quadrant D products.  They plan to start this approximately $100M program in 2013.

For those that missed this free workshop, ACI host Mike Prestoy is planning another one in 6 months.

Cheers,

Dr. Ron

Folks,

Some time ago, I mentioned that I was working on a consensus of the status of lead-free/RoHS compliant assembly. My hope is to find data and facts that will support the consensus. I am making progress, but at this time I would like to share the subtopics in the consensus. Look them over and see what you think:

1.       Was/Is lead-free electronics/RoHS needed to protect the environment?

2.      Is lead-free solder easier and safer to recycle than lead-containing solder?

3.      How has the increased use of tin and silver affected their supply and price?

4.      How much did it cost to implement lead-free/RoHS compliant electronics?

a.      What is the cost adder to a typical lead-free product?

5.      What are the process challenges of lead-free assembly?

a.      Are these challenges being addressed?

b.      If so, how?

6.        What is the reliability of lead-free vs leaded electronics for commercial applications?

a.      E.g. 0C to 100C thermal cycle, drop shock

7.        What is the reliability of lead-free vs leaded electronics for harsh environment/military applications?

a.      E.g. -55C to 125C thermal cycle, other Mil stress tests

8.      What is the threat of tin whiskers, tin pest and other similar lead-free related reliability phenomena?

9.      What is the status and need for halogen-free assembly?

Help me by suggesting topics that I have left out.     
Contact info here.
Cheers,
Dr. Ron

Folks,

In a recent posting we discussed that the higher melting temperatures of lead-free solder require reflow soldering temperatures to be higher, thus more electricity is used in lead-free assembly. However, as we calculated, this increased use of electricity is very small compared to all electricity used in the world.

An additional concern that some have voiced is the claim that RoHS, with its lead-free requirement, actually makes the environment worse because more tin and silver is used in lead-free solders.   They argue that the increased use of these metals, creates mining pollution and has driven the price of these metals sky high. Let’s examine these claims.

Prismark has estimated that approximately 90,000 tons of solder are used in electronics, with about 80,000 used in wave soldering and 10,000 tons for SMT soldering. It is important to remember that electronics solder is a subset of all solder. All solder (alloys for brazing pipes etc) uses about 190,000 tons of tin. Solder is the single largest user of tin. See Figure 1. 

Figure 1. Solder is the largest end use of tin. Tin is the base material for almost all solders. 

If tin-lead solder were still used predominantly, approximately 57,000 tons of tin (90,000 x 63% tin) would be used annually. With lead-free solder, about 88,000 tons (90,000 x 98% tin) of tin are used per year. This is an apparent increase of about 30,000 MT of tin used each year. However, an interesting thing to consider is that lead-free solder is about 14% lighter than tin-lead solder. Knowing that, and knowing that solder used in wave soldering (remember wave soldering accounts for almost 90% of all solder used in electronics assembly) is consumed by volume not weight (i.e. assuming approximately the same fillet size), about half of this increase is canceled out. 

This is all a bit confusing however, so it may be best to just to look at tin use. According to the United States Geological Survey (USGS), about 300,000 tons of tin are mined each year. Figure 2 is a graph of world tin production at mines per year (this graph does not show recycled tin.)  The amount of refined tin used each year in the US is depicted in Figure 3. Figure 3 includes about 15,000 tons a year of recycled tin. Recycling solder is very cost effective. Scott Mazur just pointed out (Printed Circuit Design and Fab and Circuits Assembly, p 36, August 2011), that recycling solder dross is 10 times as cost effective as recycling aluminum cans.

Looking at these graphs, it is hard to say that the amount of tin used has gone up since RoHS. It would appear that tin use is likely more affected by the economy and that it is really difficult to see an effect from RoHS’s July 2006 enactment.

Figure 2. World Tin Production at Mines. 

Most wave soldering solders have low or no silver. So, about 3% of the 10,000 tons of SMT solder, or 300 MTs of silver, are used in electronics. This is about 1.5% of the 22,000 MTs of silver produced each year. Silver use in electronics does not make anyone’s list of top silver usage.

Figure 3. US consumption of tin has decreased since RoHS was enacted.

So electronics solder use since RoHS has not caused tin use to increase, nor is it a significant factor in silver use. Therefore it is highly unlikely that electronics' use of tin or silver has been a prime driver in their stunning price increases in 2011.

• High thermal conductivity (33W/mK)
• Higher melting point than SAC alloys (221C)
• Low tensile stress, so suitable for large die (5800psi)
• Excellent thermal cycling properties (-55 to 125C)

1.  Preform (a specially-shaped solder piece) with TACflux® used to hold the preform and die in place
2.  Solder paste, which holds the die in place with no extra materials added 
3.  Soft solder die-attach wire, a fluxless type of solder wire, which is melted onto the substrate metallization under an inert cover gas, and the die directly mounted onto the molten solder pool, then allowed to cool.

Folks,

When the industry was preparing to transition to lead-free solders almost ten years ago (can it have been that long), tin-bismuth solders were serious candidates. Their low melting point, of about 138C, made these solders interesting candidates to replace tin-lead solder. However, if contaminated with lead, tin-bismuth solders can produce a eutectic phase that melts at 96C. In such situations the resulting solder joint exhibits poor performance in thermal cycle testing. Since early in the transition to lead-free solders it was expected that there would be numerous components and PWBs with lead-based surface finishes, this property made tin-bismuth solders unacceptable.

Another aspect of tin-bismuth solders is that they expand on cooling. This phenomenon can result in fillet lift in through-hole solder joints.

However, as we are now well into 2011, almost no components or PWBs have lead-containing finishes and many portable electronic devices have no through-hole components, so it may be time to reconsider tin-bismuth for some applications.

Some years ago, Hewlett Packard (HP) had performed work to show that adding 1% silver to tin-bismuth solder enabled this alloy to outperform eutectic tin-lead solder in 0 to 100C thermal cycle testing. Even at these low reflow temperatures, HP demonstrated solder joint strength with SAC BGA solder balls that was 65% that of tin-lead solder. Expanding on this work, Indium Corporation's Ed Briggs and Brook Sandy performed stencil printing and reflow experiments consistent with the requirements of current miniaturized components using this 57Bi-42Sn-1Ag solder. All of their results were promising. Ed presented a paper at SMTA Toronto,summarized the Hewlett Packard work, and reviewed the results of this new work.

So for applications consistent with 0-100C thermal cycling, 57Bi-42Sn-1Ag solder may be something to consider if the high temperature of SAC solder paste is an issue to components or PWBs in a product

Cheers,

Dr. Ron 

PS: Read my follow-on posting about bismuth.

Folks,

I thought I would take a stab at listing the minuses, pluses, and “it’s a wash” aspects of assembling with lead-free (LF) solder. Here are my first thoughts. Please tell me what I missed or disagree.

Cheers,

Dr. Ron

Minuses

1.    Pb-Free requires higher reflow temperatures
The Tm for LF solders, in the 217-229C range, has created numerous challenges:

a.      PWB warpage and damage

b.      Component damage

c.      New defect modes such as graping and head-in-pillow defects (although concurrent reduction in solder paste deposit sizes for 0201 and 01005 passives and 0.3 mm CSPs also exacerbate these defects)

d.      Defects related to increased oxidation

e.      Increases in voiding

f.       Increases in tombstoning

2.      The higher cost of LF solder, mostly for wave soldering

a.      It’s not just the silver, tin is much more expensive than lead

3.      Poorer wetting of LF solders, creating the most significant challenges in wave soldering

4.      More rapid copper pad dissolution on PWBs in wave soldering

5.      LF solder attack of wave solder machine components

6.      LF reliability in harsh thermal cycle testing appears poorer than tin-lead solders

7.      Tin Whiskers

It’s a Wash

1.      Short-term reliability in consumer product-type environments

2.      Protection of the environment if discarded products are improperly disposed of

a.      Lead in electronics has never been shown to cause a problem in land fills

3.      Since July 2006, about $3 trillion of products have been manufactured with LF solder, with no “the sky is falling”-type of problems

Pluses

1.      LF solder's poor wetting enables finer lead spacings (see photo Courtesy of Motorola)

a.      It may be argued that some modern electronic products (e.g. smartphones) could not be made with tin-lead solder

2.      It is safer to recycle LF solders, especially if performed in a non-controlled environment

Folks,

Back in October, I posted comments on lead-free reliability.   In this post, I mentioned that I chaired a session at SMTAI on “Alternate Alloys”. At this session, Greg Henshall presented a paper on the  Low Silver BGA Sphere Metallurgy Project. This paper was a collaborative effort of six companies.  In addition, Richard Coyle presented an overview of the work of three companies titled “The Effect of Silver Content on the Solder Joint Reliability of a Pb-free PBGA Package.” Both projects evaluated lead-free thermal cycle reliability as a function of silver content and compared the results to SnPb reliability.

Both papers concluded that, as far as 0^oC to 100 ^oC thermal cycle reliability is concerned in their experiments, SnPb < SAC105 < SAC305 < SAC405

Coyle’s presentation summed it up best:

“Each of the SAC alloys outperformed the SnPb eutectic alloy in every test, including the long, 60 min. dwell time test. This tends to diminish the argument that SAC is less reliable than SnPb.”

To be clear, it was two papers by two different groups coming to the same conclusion. It would probably be a stretch to say that the conclusions of either group were “almost unique".

Denny Fritz responded to this blog post with this point:

“No one I know will dispute your ranking of SAC better than SnPb solder using the commercial temperature cycle Henshall uses – 0C to 100C. But, harsh environment electronics have to perform to either -40C or -55C, and most use a top end cycling temperature of 125C. IT IS IN THAT WIDE THERMAL CYCLE TESTING THAT SnPb outperforms SAC solders.”

Denny’s point is well taken. I believe it can be said that SAC alloys have demonstrated acceptable reliability in commercial, non harsh environments (i.e. mobile phones, PCs, consumer electronics, etc.) However, it cannot be said that acceptable reliability for SAC has been established for military (RoHS exempt) and harsh (i.e. automobile engine compartment) environments.

A short time ago, Werner Engelmaier wrote an article on this topic (Global SMT Vol 11, No. 1, Jan 2011, pp 38-40.), which among other things he said:

“Of course, ‘Dr. Ron’ selectively picks data agreeing with the point of view he held from the inception of the Pb-ban under RoHS on a plot with an expanded x-axis overemphasizing the differences and supporting a solder joint reliability ranking of SnPb < SAC105 < SAC305 < SAC405.”

Ouch! My motives were not quite so nefarious, I chaired a session and wanted to share the conclusions.

However, Werner makes good points in his article, data exist disagreeing with this reliability ranking and he suggests some good points on how to conduct reliability tests so that comparisons can be made between data sets.

In reading some of his other articles, I was delighted to find that we actually agree on the state of lead-free reliability in thermal cycle testing. Here is a statement of his circa 2008 (Global SMT, Vol 8., No. 8, Aug 2008 pp 46-48.):fting, and n

“It has been 2 years since the infamous ban of Pb-solders under RoHS. What have we learned? For solder joints, no dramatic differences in reliability are apparent. The data bases for LF-solders have grown, the favored LF-solders might be shifting, and no reliability model exists as of yet. Nevertheless, progress has been made.”

Cheers,

Dr. Ron

Although most scientists today feel that alchemy has been widely discredited, and I have been taught to agree, the idea of it is whimsical and exhilarating.  Of course, I don’t have a hope of changing the makeup of bismuth or transforming it into another metal, but in a modern way, it’s very interesting how bismuth can be used to change the properties of other metals significantly - through alloying. In my last post on bismuth, I outlined its physical properties, some of which I find rather unusual. The main reason I originally researched bismuth was because of its viability for use as a low temperature Pb-free alloy.

BACKGROUND:
I'm not an alchemist like Newton, I can't transmute bismuth to gold like Seaborg, but I can use bismuth and metallurgy to transform an alloy.

I just read a fascinating article about Sir Isaac Newton titled, “Moonlighting as a Conjurer of Chemicals”. Newton is widely regarded as one of the most important people in the history of science, and he was very devoted to his work. The revelation in this article about the depth of his interest in alchemy left me somewhat awestruck. In my previous reading about Newton, I remember perhaps a mention of his interest in alchemy, but I guess I figured it was because science and alchemy, at that time, were fairly closely related. As scholars are starting to translate more of his diaries, they are discovering that his passion was alchemy and he saw it as the path to complete control over the natural world.  

I suppose if it was still socially acceptable to be an alchemist that is what I would have wanted to be; it just never seemed to be a viable option. What I have chosen to do now kind of makes sense considering chemistry/metallurgy is about as close as you can get nowadays. 

Reading this article reminded me of some interesting information I had come across while researching bismuth a couple months ago; namely that, although bismuth wasn’t one of the seven central metals in alchemy, it has an "alchemical" symbol (#52 in the image to the left) and was frequently used, although it’s not known for what purpose. I also came across this bit of information:

“In 1980, a scientist named Glenn T. Seaborg was able to transmute a minute quantity of bismuth into gold at the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, via nuclear collisions.” 

Seaborg is a fascinating scientist in his own right and discussion about him could fill quite a number of blog posts. Is it possible that alchemists underestimated bismuth and should have focused more on turning it into gold?

BACK TO MODERN TECHNOLOGY:
The eutectic alloy of 58Bi/42Sn has been used since the Pb-free transition as a low temperature (138°C liquidus) option for soldering products used at ambient temperatures - such as consumer electronics.  Note the low melting temperature of this alloy, despite the individual melting temperatures of bismuth and tin, 271°C and 232°C, respectively. Although bismuth is typically known to be quite brittle, this alloy has been shown to perform similarly to the SnPb eutectic solder (in response to a comment on my last post, for further data-based information, please feel free to contact me directly). In cases where more ductility is desirable, 1% silver can be added, further improving thermal shock and fatigue resistance. Perhaps the similarity in performance makes sense because of bismuth’s proximity (right next to) lead on the periodic table, although they differ in several other qualities such as toxicity.

The more I learn about bismuth, the more interested I become. Now if only I could find some in-depth alchemical information about it from Sir Isaac Newton.

Folks,

I was at SMTAI (Surface Mount Technology Association International) from September 24 and 27, 2010.   As I mentioned, I chaired a session on Alternative Alloys from 2:00-3:30PM on Tuesday 26^th.

At this session, Greg Henshall presented a paper on the Low Silver BGA Sphere Metallurgy Project. This paper was a collaborative effort of six companies. In addition, Richard Coyle presented an overview of the work of three companies entitled The Effect of Silver Content on the Solder Joint Reliability of a Pb-free PBGA Package. Both of these projects evaluated lead-free thermal cycle reliability as a function of silver content and compared the results to tin-lead reliability.

Both papers concluded that as far as thermal cycle reliability is concerned SnPb<SAC105<SAC305< SAC405. Coyle’s paper summed it up the best:

Each of the SAC alloys outperformed the SnPb eutectic alloy in every test including the long, 60 minute dwell time test. This tends to diminish the argument that SAC is less reliable than SnPb. (See Coyle’s figure. Data curves to the right are more reliable.)

Henshall’s paper also showed that the addition of dopants, to improve shock resistance, in SAC105 does not reduce thermal cycle life.

So, it appears, at this time, that, from a thermal cycle and drop shock perspective, it is looking more and more like SAC based solders out perform tin-lead solders in these two reliability arenas.

At the end of the session a noted lead-free curmudgeon came over to introduce himself.  We have had a jovial disagreement on several blogs etc. in the past re: lead-free status and issues, but had not met in person.   I should mention that this person is a college graduate, a former technical leader at several influential technological companies, and he owns a PE license. I asked him what he now thought about lead-free reliability after hearing the talks. He claimed that he is a little less likely to think that lead-free reliability is a disaster. He still refuses to purchase any lead-free products. He buys old units (pre-2006) on eBay.

I mentioned that over $2 trillion of electronics has been placed in the field since 2006 with no unusual reliability issues.   I then went on to say that a RoHS-compliant product is much more likely to fail due to a non-RoHS related issue. He did not disagree. So then I asked him why he won’t use RoHS compliant electronics. His answer: “I just don’t trust them.”

Cheers,

Folks,

Answers to the quiz of a few weeks back......

Phil and Rob had agreed to ask the GM if it was OK to ask the tech and engineers at some of their subcontractors to take the test anonymously. Over a period of two months Phil and Rob got 52 people to agree, almost all of them after Phil or Rob agreed to take them to lunch. They asked Patty to grade the “exams.” Today Patty would reveal the results.

“Phil, this is one of the best bets I have ever made,” teased Rob.

Everyone at the lunch table chuckled, but the look on Phil’s face said he expected to lose. Rob has said that he thought the average score would be less than 70%, Phil insisted that it would be greater than 85%. In asking the different folks to take the test, invariably Phil started asking questions not on the test. He was surprised that no one knew what tin pest was. He even asked how to time balance a chip shooter and flexible placer, only one in twenty knew.

As Patty approached the lunch table, the ensemble held their breath.

“OK, Patty, tell us the bad news,” Phil said in a resigned tone.

“Rob wins, the average score was 58%,” Patty said getting to the point. “Here are the answers and percentages on each problem,” she went on:

1.    What is the composition of SAC305?
96.5% tin, 3.0% silver, 0.5% copper. 60% got this right.

2.     What are tin whiskers?
Tin whiskers are metal whiskers that can “grow” from tin plating on component leads. They are mitigated by 2% bismuth in the tin, a nickel overplate of the lead copper, a matte tin finish, and a few other mitigation approaches. 40%.

3.     In a stencil aperture, what is the area ratio?
The ratio of the area of the aperture opening divided by the area of the side walls. This ratio is typically used for circular and square apertures. It is equal to D/4t, where D is the diameter of square side and t is the stencil thickness. 40%

4.    What is an approximate peak temperature for a reflow oven in lead-free assembly?
Any answer 235 to 250C accepted. 90%

5.     A board is inspected after wave soldering and one lead is not soldered to the board. The board is run through the wave solder machine again and has the same defect on the same lead. What is the most likely cause of the defect?

a.       The solder temperature is too low.

b.      The pad on the board is oxidized.

c.       The preheat temperature is too high.
b 70%

6.     What are local fiducials on a PWB for?
Local fiducials are located near the pads of a component with fine lead spacings to assure accurate placement. 70%

7.     What does "thixotropic" mean in regard to solder pastes?
The viscosity decreases with increasing shear stress. Hence, during printing the viscosity drops as the paste is forced through the aperture, aiding good aperture fill. It increases as the printed deposit rests, minimizing slump. 20%

8.     A chip shooter places passives at a rate of 36,000 per hour. It is placing 300 passives on a PWB, how many seconds will the chipshooter take to place the passives on one board?
300/36000 = 1/120 hr = 30 seconds. 90%

9.     A reflow oven belt speed is 100 cm/min. The PWB is 40 cm long. What is the minimum cycle time that the oven can support?
The amount of time that the belt needs to cover 40 cm is 40/100 = 0.4 minutes = 24 seconds. This is the minimum cycle time the oven can support. 40%

10.   What is "tombstoning"?
Tombstoning is observed when a passive component's terminations experience unequal wetting forces which are strong enough to lift one end of the passive so that it looks like a tombstone. 60%

Overall average score 58%.

“Wait a minute Patty, your answers are too demanding,” Phil shouted.

“Calm down Phil, I gave full credit for anything close,” Patty responded.

In unison, almost everyone at the table sighed “Yikes.”

Patty interjected, “One person who received a 70% commented after completing problem 9, ‘I didn’t think I would need a PhD in math to do this quiz.’ “

All agreed that organizations like the SMTA and IPC were more needed than ever.

Folks,

After my recent post on the fact that there was no data linking tin whiskers to the Toyota sudden acceleration issues, there continue to be more posts saying things like “Tin Whiskers Implicated in Unintended Acceleration Problems.”  Many of these posts link back to the earlier TechEye post.   The basis for all of the posts, is a paper written by EurIng Keith Armstrong .   Armstrong’s paper is titled: “Toyota ‘sticking pedals’ recall is a smokescreen, Their sudden unintended acceleration problem is caused by electronics either due to EMI, lead-free soldering or software ‘bugs.’” It does not appear that Armstrong’s paper was sponsored or refereed. 

Since it appears that this entire wave of reporting implicating tin whiskers, in this important issue, emanates from Armstrong's paper, it is helpful to quote his entire comments on Tin Whiskers:

            "9.0 Lead-free soldering:

In recent years, various countries and trade blocs (including the European Union) have banned the use of lead on electrical solder, on the basis that lead going into landfill when electrical and electronic products are disposed of is bad for the environment, and hence for people.

But many accuse them of being shortsighted – lead has been added to solder in quite large amounts for many decades because it made the other main constituent, tin, behave much better, considerably improving reliability.

Now that lead has been removed from solder, which is now mainly tin (with a little silver and copper added) all sorts of new possibilities arise for short-circuits and open-circuits, and intermittent shorts and opens, mainly on printed circuit boards (PCBs) and mainly associated with small-footprint integrated circuits (ICs), especially ball-grid arrays (BGAs).

Its really just another cause of intermittent or fixed short-or-open circuits in electronic PCBs and modules - but one that would not have been any problem until a few years ago, and so could have caught Toyota by surprise.

John R Barnes has created a monumentally huge library of references to the problems of lead-free soldering, especially tin whiskering, see www.dbicorporation.com/rohsbib.htm. Prepare to be totally overwhelmed!

Removing lead from solder has the following effects:

9.1 Tin whiskers

These will grow out of soldered joints and can contact other conductors, causing short-circuits between PCB copper traces and the pins of connectors. They are often no longer than 0.5mm (about 1/50th of an inch) but can grow to 1mm (about 1/24th of an inch) or longer, especially in damp conditions.

Even at 1/50th of an inch they can short between the pins on a modern integrated circuit (IC). And the process of removing the PCB for inspection can brush them off, so you never find them.

And if you didn't accidentally brush them off, they are so thin they are very hard to see - you need a powerful microscope. They are as fine as the finest spider-web threads, yet can carry sufficient current to short-out the electronics. You won’t see them unless you are looking for them.

Being so thin, they can wave around in the breeze and/or due to shocks, vibration and acceleration, causing intermittent short-circuits.

The iNEMI organisation has published guidelines (www.inemi.org) on how to ensure that tin whiskers don’t grow too long, but I don’t know to what extent these are followed by suppliers of electronics to the car industry in general, or Toyota in particular."

Note that, in this paper,  there is no data or any evidence re: tin whiskers discussed from investigating any of the vehicles in question. All of this paper is an opinion.   In addition, the title of Armstrong’s paper leaves no room for any other cause, it has to be electronics or software. This position is very strong indeed for having no supporting data.

More recently Bob Landman added these comments to the tin whisker discussion:

“the increased use of electronics in automobiles when mixed with RoHS can make for a deadly cocktail. We don’t know what the causative agent [in regard to the Toyota recalls] was, but I have heard recently of new autos showing up at dealers that will not start. That cause has been linked to tin whiskers.”

Bob heard this. There is no report and no data. Until Bob gives us a reference for some analysis and data, his comments are little more than hearsay.  I searched the web in vain to find information related to Bob’s quote. In addition this comment is a little surprising, tin whiskers are usually associated with a certain amount of aging, hence not usually found in new products.   

That tin whiskers exist and cause failures is irrefutable. NASA  has an excellent website related to tin whiskers and failures caused by them. However, the total number of tin whisker fails reported is less than 100. Many other types of electronic failure modes would appear to be much more common.

My purpose of writing this post is not to suggest that tin whiskers are not a concern in lead-free electronics. However, it is a fundamental principle in engineering and science to only make pronouncements on how something failed, when they can be supported with data. No data supports implicating tin whiskers in the Toyota incidents. It is also troubling how readily many people referenced the work of Armstrong without apparently reading what he said and checking his sources and lack of data.

This blog has been in existence for a little over two years now, and we would like to thank our readers for the feedback and inquiries you have provided. I welcome your comments on what you would like from us. Leave a comment below, or email me at jhisert@indium.com.

And now a look back on past topics of interest:
 

Grid Ink, Silver Ink, Conductive Ink

Bismuth/Tin Tabbing Ribbon, A Low Temperature Pb-Free Alternative

Plated Metallization for C-Si Solar Cells

Increase Packing Density for Evaporation Crucibles

Photon’s 5th PV Tech Show 2010 USA

IPC Solar Standards Update

Solder Shelf Life as Explained by Eric Bastow

Tips to Speed Your Solder and Flux Selection

What's Happening in the Technical Service Department 

A Day in the Life of a Tech Guy

A Clean Laboratory

CIGS for Beginners

3rd Renewable Energy Expo 2009 in New Delhi, India

Solar Products and Representatives

Kleenex®, Google™, FedX®, CIGs?

Indium Solar Products Reunited

Trade Show Visitors Love the Ground Floor

Solar Product Data Sheets

Intersolar 2009 – What Barrier to CIGS Technology?

Concentrator Photovoltaic Systems - Will they reach 50% Efficiency?

Standards for Solar Panel Manufacturing

Solar Panel Certification: “Barrier and Benefit” Reviewed by Eric Bastow

Low Temperature Metallization Paste

What Will Your Interest Be At InterSolar? Meet the Bloggers And Let Us Know.

Share Your Solar Images

SAC vs. Sn/Ag for Solar Soldering

Solder Thickness for PV Interconnect

What is Bus Ribbon?

Standard PV Interconnect Ribbon Sizes

No-Clean Flux

Photovoltaics in EMS Sector

PV Interconnect Products

Eric Bastow - East Coast Technical Support

Mario Scalzo - West Coast Technical Support

Au/Sn Sputtering Targets

SMT Goes Solar

A Trip Down Memory Lane 

More Information About Metallization Paste

A year in the Life of a Solar Blog

CIG Target

23rd European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition

TCO choices for CIGS manufacturing 

CIGS Absorber Layer Electroplating

No Slump Metallization Paste

Meet the Bloggers

CIGS - Can sputtering make a breakthrough?

Fluxes for Soldering Tabbing Ribbon

Computer Brain vs. Solar Photovoltaic

Beam it down from space

Selection of the Optimum Lead-Free Solder for Solar Tabbing Ribbon

Record Makes Thin-Film Solar Cell Competitive with Silicon Efficiency

Why Thin-Film Solar Cells are Here to Stay

Hot Rooftops to Flashy Digital Cameras

Synchronize Your Solar Cell

Solar Conversion Efficiencies  

Government Support is the Key

It's Just a Beginning ...

Andy Mackie: What role does gold play in protecting surfaces in SMT and semiconductor assembly processes?

Lenora Toscano: Gold does not form an oxide; it protects the nickel from oxidation or passivation. A clean nickel surface has very high solderability for most solder types, but its oxide is very difficult to remove with standard flux types. Also, gold dissolves almost instantaneously into most solders during assembly, thus promoting superior wettability.

Andy Mackie: What standards exist on the thickness of gold for different electronics and semiconductor assembly applications?

Lenora Toscano: The main application of ENIG (electroless nickel/immersion gold) coating is in chip-on-board (COB) technology, the typical thickness of the immersion gold layer on the HDI substrate being 3-5 micro-inches.

Edge connectors typically require the use of hard gold. Acid gold deposits are used for compliance with MIL-STD-275, which states that gold shall be in accordance with MIL-G-45204, Type II, Class 1. The thickness shall be 50-100 micro-inches, typical thickness is 30-50 micro-inches on 150micro-inches nickel.

On the other hand, for solderable surfaces, typical thickness is 5-15 micro-inches on 150micro-inches nickel.

For wire bonding, in general, gold plating of a minimum of 30 micro-inches on 200 micro-inches nickel works well. Soft gold is generally preferred. Soft gold processes are also used for boards designed for semiconductor chip (die) attachment. These qualities comply with Type I and III of MIL-G-45204.

Andy Mackie:  What are the differences between gold layers deposited by immersion gold and electroplated gold processes?

Lenora Toscano: There are five main differences:

1. The coating thickness is different. Immersion gold is a displacement reaction, gold displaces the nickel on the surface, and is self-limiting as the nickel surface is coated with the immersion gold. Common baths cannot produce thicknesses of much more than 10 micro-inches, while with electroplated gold the thickness depends on current and time. The higher current or longer the plating time the thicker the gold coating.
2. The structure of the gold deposit layers is different. Electroplated gold is denser that the naturally porous immersion deposit.
3. The hardness is usually different. Electroplated gold often has other metals introduced into the plating that make the deposit harder.
4. Porosity is different. Immersion deposits have more porosity that electroplated deposits; it is the nature of the plating system.
5. Deposition composition (purity) varies with additives in the bath. Immersion gold baths contain gold as the only plated metal, while electroplating systems may introduce small amounts of other metals.

Andy Mackie: How thick does gold have to be to fully protect the underlying surface, and what are the trade-offs as customers attempt to reduce their gold costs?

Lenora Toscano: Per IPC-4552 ENIG specification, 1.97 micro-inches is the recommended minimum at +/-4 sigma from the mean, with 3 – 5 micro-inches being typical.

The immersion gold deposit is porous by definition. It does offer very good protection to the underlying nickel, but over time the porosity of the deposit results in the passivation of the nickel surface and the wetting forces will be reduced. Of course, this process should take years to occur, but if the gold coating is too thin (below the minimum requirement), it will occur sooner and affect the solderability. 

Andy Mackie: What advantage does gold have over silver or other metals?

Lenora Toscano: Again, gold has good tarnish resistance and solderability after storage because it does not form an oxide or hydroxides, so it is unaffected by temperature and storage conditions that might reduce the shelf-life of the other finishes. It meets requirements for lead-free (Pb-free) assembly while offering a coplanar surface that is both solderable and aluminum-wire and gold-wire bondable.

Gold has good electrical conductivity, and produces a contact surface with low electrical resistance. Electroplated gold is also an excellent etch resist.

Electroplated silver is not widely used in the printed circuit industry. Under certain conditions or electrical potential and humidity, silver will migrate along the surface of the deposit and through the body of insulation to produce low-resistance leakage paths. Alkaline cyanide baths for silver electroplating are highly toxic.

Immersion silver is susceptible to problems if not correctly stored and even packaged. Packaging materials that contain sulfur or allow exposure to air will result in tarnishing of the surface (sulfide, sulfate, and chloride formation). High levels of surface contamination can detrimentally affect solderability.

Folks,

A few years ago, Prismark estimated that the world electronics usage of lead was 18,500 tons per year. Assume most solder at the time was tin-lead eutectic (63% tin, 37% solder) this would equate to about 50,000 tons per year of solder used in electronics and 31,500 tons of this solder being tin. With the advent of lead free soldering, using say SAC305 (96.5% tin, 3.0% silver and 0.5% copper), most folks would suggest that .965 x 50,000 = 48,250 tons of tin are now being used, an increase of about 17,000 tons of tin. However, solder is used by volume not weight, assuming a leaded and lead-free solder joint are of the same size (i.e. volume). Since the density of tin-lead eutectic solder is 8.4 g/cc and the density of SAC305 is 7.36 g/cc, a given lead-free solder joint weighs only 87.6% (100 x 7.38/8.4) of a tin-lead joint.

Considering this argument, our 50,000 tons of solder of solder per year, requires only 50,000 x 0.876 = 43,806 tons of SAC305 lead-free solder to make the same solder joint volume. This amount of SAC solder contains 42,276 tons of tin, an increase of less than 11,000 tons of tin over using tin-lead solder. When one considers that for wave soldering, the lack of wetting of lead-free solder further reduces the volume of solder used, the actual increase in tin usage may be < 10,000 tons.

The United States Geological Survey estimates that about 300,000 tons of tin are mined each year. So the increased use of tin for lead-free is about 3-4% of that mined. This figure matches well with the USGS's statement that tin usage in the US rose 2% in 2007. However, with numbers this small it is hard to support any trend.

I thought these numbers might be helpful in understanding the impact of lead-free soldering on tin consumption.  Many had assumed that lead-free would dramatically impact tin supplies, when in truth lead-free solder has only a secondary or tertiary impact on tin usage.

The photo is an image of a lead-free through-hole solder joint cross-section that my Indium colleagues took.  It is likely that the equivalent tin-lead joint would have even more solder volume as discussed above.

Cheers,
Dr. Ron