From One Engineer to Another

Common Cause vs Special Cause Defects

Sunday, April 19, 2009 by Dr. Ron Lasky [Dr. Ron Lasky]

Folks,

In teaching process optimization and failure analysis, one of the most helpful concepts is understanding he difference between common cause and special cause defects.  A special cause defect, in a well tuned process, occurs when something unpredictable changes.  As an example, let's say you get a batch of printed wiring boards (PWBs) that have oxidation on the pads.  This is a defect and the boards shouldn't  used, however we will assume that somehow they made it through the company's receiving inspection process.  It should not be too surprising that when the boards are assembled that they have a poor first pass yield, say 35%.  Typical first pass yield in this optimized process is 95%.  It is obvious that the poor yield was due to this "special cause," the oxidized pads.

Common cause failures are a little more difficult to explain and comprehend.  In a process, there are multiple entities that can vary, within the specifications, such as  the solder paste viscosity, the temperature and humidity of the room, the reflow profile, the wettability of the component leads and PWB pads etc.  Statistically, within the specifications, the variation can be such as to result in a small number of fails......say the 5% we get with this process when everything is as it should be.  These types of fails are called common cause fails.

It is fundamentally crucial to understand the differences between special and common cause fails to successfully monitor and improve processes.  One of the tragedies that  I often see when the failure rate increases, due to special cause fails, is the process engineers changing the process parameters (e.g. raising the reflow temperatures when the pads in the special cause example above did not wet).  In a well optimized process the process parameters are determined by designed experiments, any collapse of process yields is the result of a special cause.  You can only fix special causes by identifying and rectifying them, not by changing the process!

Cheers,

Dr. Ron 

Comments for Common Cause vs Special Cause Defects

Tuesday, August 11, 2009 by Wedding Invitations:
A good explanation on common cause and special cause failure analysis. A proper deep study in this field will definitely reduce the failure rate for any products, not only PCB boards. But, it is applicable to all industry level quantities.
Saturday, August 22, 2009 by UK company formation:
Usually, we dont realize the difference between common cause and special cause because we assume it falls under same category. Separating these two values and treating differrently gives us better production rate with minimal failure rate.
Thursday, September 3, 2009 by Best Anti Wrinkle Cream:
Interesting set of studies that let us learn more about risk management. It is very useful during economy downturn as we don’t want to see a lot of failure. So, failure analysis should be part of production team in all manufacturing fields.

Leave a comment





Captcha