Flux Cleaning

Maria Durham, Indium’s new Technical Specialist in Semiconductor and Advanced Assembly Materials, has been doing some research on indium lead (In/Pb) solder alloys. We chatted about her findings this week. 

 [Andy C. Mackie: ACM] Which indium/lead solder alloys are most common, and what are their properties?

[Maria Durham: MD] Firstly, the use of lead-(Pb-)containing solders in some soldering applications is restricted due to local environmental and RoHS compliance, but there are still many applications where they are  allowed. Many military, aerospace, and industrial equipment uses, as well as many applications related to vehicles, are exempt. The table below shows the most common indium/lead (In/Pb) alloys (pink) and their properties, sorted by liquidus temperature; the higher of the two melting points (solidus and liquidus) seen for non-eutectic alloys. In blue are three comparison materials.

Indalloy 205 is the most commonly used, probably because it has the closest liquidus temperature to the tin/lead eutectic (183°C), 63Sn/37Pb (Indalloy 106). This means it can be reflowed using a standard Sn/Pb eutectic profile. The next most common alloys that are used are Indalloy7, 204, and 206.  Besides the melting range, indium has comparable thermal and electrical conductivity to standard materials.

[ACM] What makes indium-lead (In/Pb) solders so attractive, and why have we seen a recent resurgence in their usage?

 [MD] One main attraction to using indium/lead (In/Pb) solder alloys in soldering to precious metal surfaces is that, unlike tin-containing solders, they do not leach gold. That is, gold does not dissolve in them to any appreciable extent. During discussions at Semicon West in 2011, one of our California customers reported going through 8 simulated reflows with Indalloy 205 in contact with a gold surface with no loss of joint strength and no joint embrittlement. That is pretty impressive. Note that embrittlement is often caused by gold-intermetallic formation. It has been noted that even at 250°C, 50In/50Pb dissolves Au at a rate 13 times slower than it does into 63Sn/37Pb, although this, of course, is a kinetic, not a solubility limit, study.

The higher melting Indalloy 164 (92.5Pb/5In/2.5Ag) has the lowest coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of all of the In/Pb solders and is able to withstand the higher temperature excursions that can be seen in step-soldering type applications (where a very high melting solder is used to form the first joint, followed by a next lowest melting alloy, and so on). This is seen in applications such as power electronics assembly, where the first step solder is often used for die-attach either as a solder paste, wire, or preform. The high melting point helps the solder withstand the operational temperatures associated with under-the-hood electronics, in applications such as engine control modules, where Indalloy 151 (92.5Pb/5Sn/2.5Ag) or Indalloy 163 (95.5Pb/2Sn/2.5Ag) are most commonly used. In/Pb solder is excellent on very rigid structures such as ceramic-to-metal or ceramic-to-ceramic. The desired solidus / liquidus temperature range can be adjusted by changing the indium:lead ratio, making it very easy to “dial in” the alloy to a specific reflow process.

Another attraction to using In/Pb solders is that they exhibit good fatigue resistance in thermal cycling from -55°C to 125°C.  In testing, the 50In50Pb solder joint fatigue life is about 100 times greater than that for 63Sn/37Pb.

 [ACM] What fluxes are used in these applications, and how are they formulated differently?

 [MD] The fluxes most compatible with the lower melting point (<200°C) indium-containing solders are NC-SMQ-80 (solder paste) or the lower-tack TacFlux® 012 (suitable for use with wire, preforms, and spheres). These are no-clean fluxes, specifically formulated for lower temperature reflow.  Under appropriate low temperature reflow these fluxes leave behind benign residues that do not need to be cleaned off (“no-clean” flux), although they are often cleaned off in most practical applications, usually to ensure reliable wirebonds absent of flux spatter.

 To learn more, please contact us.

 Cheers!  Andy

Eric Bastow recently wrote about using our Indalloy Flux #2 for soldering to Nitinol.  He did many tests and wrote an Application Note called Soldering to Nitinol.

Fort Wayne Metals, a leading supplier of medical wire (including Nitinol) also did a test on various fluxes as they relate to break load (maximum load before the joint breaks.

The fluxes tested included:

• Indalloy Flux #2 and Flux #3
• Indalloy Flux #5RMA; #5R; #5RA
• Indalloy Flux #4R
• Flux #400 (no longer commercially available)

The #5 series and the #4R were found to not be strong enough to clean off the tenacious oxides formed on Nitinol. Therefore, they didn't enable the solder to wet the surface properly.

Flux #2 and Flux#3 gave the best results (of the fluxes tested for break load) since they removed more of the oxides and allowed for a stronger solder bond.

Want to know more about soldering to this important medical material?  You can contact Eric Bastow directly at ebastow@indium.com or email us at medical@indium.com. 

Carol Gowans

cgowans@indium.com

With regard to soldering or wetting (coating) with indium, we are often asked to comment on the oxide formation of indium and how to remove it. We are also asked how long will it take for the oxide to reform on the surface. The procedure, below, will help you to better understand indium oxide, its removal, and how to handle it once it has been removed.

Indium is self-passivating. At room temperature, the oxide formation on the surface of the indium will be between 80-100 Angstroms thick.   Generally, this amount of oxide is not considered significant to hamper the wetting of the indium to a substrate, especially if a flux is used. Even if a flux is not used, the indium should not have any difficulty forming a joint or coating a surface.

If the application calls for an oxide-free joint and a flux cannot be used, the indium oxide can be easily removed following these steps:

·         Clean the indium in isopropyl alcohol or acetone to remove any surface organics. Allow to dry.

·         Etch the indium in 10% HCl for 1 minute to remove the surface oxides.

·         Rinse the indium in DI water to remove the acid.

·         Rinse the indium in isopropyl alcohol or acetone to remove the water.

·         Blow dry with dry nitrogen or allow to air dry.

While this etching procedure will remove the oxides, it has also opened up a whole new surface on the indium which will be prone to oxidation. Generally, the formation of oxide will begin on the surface of freshly etched indium as soon as it is exposed to air. At this time the thickness of the oxide layer is between 30-40 Angstroms. After 2-3 days of being exposed to air, the oxide has reached its passivating thickness of 80-100 Angstroms.

Note: 

Indium has the unique ability to cold weld to itself when the oxides have been removed. During the etching process, care must be taken to keep units of indium separated so they will not stick together. If they do stick, it is very difficult to separate them without distorting the indium.

If the etched indium is not going to be used immediately, storage in a nitrogen dry box is recommended . Alternatively, the etched indium can be submerged in clean acetone to prevent exposure to air.

FLUX:
To solder directly to stainless steel, Indalloy #2 Flux (activation range 100-371°C) must be used to remove the surface oxides, allowing a clean surface for the solder to wet. This flux is recommended for mechanical assembly joining only. Due to the corrosiveness, it is not recommend for electrical applications because, if the post reflow flux residue is not thoroughly removed using warm water with mechanical scrubbing, the joint will be compromised due to the potential for corrosion during its life. An alternate solution would be to nickel plate the stainless steel, so a weaker flux (RA, ROL1) can be used that is less corrosive and can be easily removed with an appropriate solvent.   

Another alternate solution is to use a forming gas consisting of nitrogen and hydrogen. This method of oxide removal is generally used when the soldering temperature can be above 350°C which is ideal for activating the hydrogen to reduce the oxides. With this method, there is no post-reflow flux residue to clean up.

SOLDER:
The solders usually recommended for stainless steel joining applications contain a considerable amount of tin; however, the actual solder choice has to fit the temperature range of the application. Generally, a low-temperature application may require Indalloy #1E (52In,48Sn) - 118°C (eutectic), while Indalloy #182 (80Au,20Sn)- 280°C (also eutectic) is a great solder choice for high temperature. If you are looking for a solder in the moderate range of temperatures, Indalloy #121 (96.5Sn, 3.5Ag); 221°C (eutectic) is an excellent choice as well as any of the SAC alloys in the same temperature range. There are also many other solders to choose from that will work equally as well. Please see our solder alloy physical properties chart or consult our Applications Engineering staff at Indium Corporation.

We are frequently asked if it is possible to solder to aluminum. The answer is yes, if the following guidelines are followed: 

FLUXES:
Because it is difficult to solder to aluminum, Indium Corporation developed Indalloy Flux #3 (activation temperature is 96-343°C) to remove the tenacious oxides that prevent the solder from wetting to the surface. This flux is very corrosive and is not recommended for electronic applications because, if any of the post-reflow flux residue remains after a warm water rinse with mechanical scrubbing, the joint may be compromised. This flux is recommended for mechanical assembly joining applications only. 

Another alternate solution is to use a forming gas consisting of nitrogen and hydrogen. This method of oxide removal is generally used when the soldering temperature is greater than 350°C which is ideal for activating the hydrogen to reduce the oxides. With this method, there is no post-reflow flux residue to clean up.

METALLIZATIONS:
An alternate to corrosive fluxes is to nickel plate the aluminum so a weaker flux (RA, ROL1) can be used. These fluxes are less corrosive and can be easily removed with an appropriate solvent.   There are many solder alloys that will wet to nickel. Check out our solder alloy physical properties table.

SOLDER ALLOYS:
The solders that are normally recommended for joining aluminum are:

• Indalloy #201 (91Sn, 9Zn); 199°C E
• Indalloy #176 (95Zn, 5Al); 382°C E. 

Tombstoning

• the transition to Pb-Free (higher reflow temperatures, and related flux issues)
• miniaturization (0201s and 01005s)

• The reflow oven operator can slow down the ramp rate. A slower ramp rate allows for more uniform warming of the PCBA.
• Another technique is to employ a "soak" just below the melting temperature (solidus) of the alloy. For example, for a SAC305 profile (217°C solidus), one may implement a "soak" at 205 to 210°C for 30 to 120 seconds. This allows for the cooler parts of the PCBA to "catch up" to the warmer parts. After thermal equilibrium has been achieved, one can spike the temperature up to the appropriate peak temperature (i.e. 245°C). This technique (depicted in the reflow profile shown at the right) allows for all of the solder paste deposits to melt and wet the component terminations at roughly the same time; thereby, mitigating tombstoning.

Phone: +1.315.853.4900
E-mail: ebastow@indium.com

Here is a list of tricks to help you overcome the issues that can arise while hand soldering silicon-based solar cells (and other applications as well). Some of these ideas are obvious for most, but all the suggestions can help you form a better solder joint - and build a better final product:

1)    Use the correct soldering tip. I’ve made the mistake of using an inappropriate solder tip before, and so have many of my customers. It’s a frustrating problem you will only let happen to you once: everything is set up perfectly but nothing will melt, until you notice the solder tip is not the correct size or shape. This has happened to many of my customers who were initially using cone point soldering tips when they were working with 2mm wide solder coated tabbing ribbon. Simply changing the tip to a 2mm wide chisel point made all the difference, and promoted soldering readily. Why such a big difference in performance? The chisel tip allows heat to flow across the ribbon, instead of only heating a single point. More heat flow = more heat in your solder joint.

2)    Pre-tin the soldering iron. Just as an appropriately sized soldering tip will distribute heat across the soldering surface, a bit of molten alloy can help create a thermal interface to maximize heat transfer. Remember to melt a small amount of solder onto the tip of your iron before soldering, and be sure it’s the same alloy you are soldering with. (Leave the custom alloying to us ;)

3)    Consider the alloy you are soldering. All the heat your typical soldering iron can produce will not be enough to melt some of the highest temperature alloys. Be sure to have a good understanding of the alloy you have selected. In some cases with low-temperature alloys (like bismuth or indium alloys), excessive soldering temperature can de-wet the alloy and char low temperature fluxes.

4)    Use the correct flux. Fluxes are quite different, I’ve spent my entire soldering career trying to get that point across. There are fluxes for high temperatures or low temperatures, cleaning with water or not cleaning at all. There are specialty fluxes for specialty alloys and there are fluxes for different soldering surfaces. Use the correct flux. If you don’t know what the best flux for the application is - just ask; that’s what I am here for.

5)    Use a bottom side heater. Silicon is known to pull heat away – that c-Si solar cell that needs to be soldered is a heatsink! Some solder equipment vendors also provide underside heating pads to help prevent excessive heat loss.

6)    Keep your soldering iron clean. That black crud that builds up on your soldering iron tip, it’s not helping you form a good solder joint. Those oxides and charred flux residues can easily be removed by wiping the hot iron across the wet sponge (that should be at your soldering station). A clean tip will lead to better heat transfer, and it will make the fluxes you use more effective.

This is the soldering station I use, it’s a PS-900 supplied by OK International. Just about any soldering iron will work, but they won’t all work as well – or come with as good support.

I’m still learning all the tricks to hand soldering, so feel free to share any you have learned over the years!

~Jim

Folks,

The Guadalajara (GDL), MX Chapter of the SMTA held their first meeting on November 9 and 10 at CETI in GDL.
Approximately 70 engineers from local companies attended. It was a great success. 

The agenda was:

November 9^th, 2011

0830-0900am    Registration and Exhibits Open

0900-0915am    Welcoming Remarks and Exhibition starts

0915-1045am    Inventec: “Reliability Assessment regarding Flux residues"

1045-1215pm    Sanmina-SCI: “Capabilities of a Failure Analysis Lab”

1215-1315pm    LUNCH

1315-1445pm    DEK: "Optimizing the Print Process for Mixed Technology"

1445 -1615pm   Vitronics Soltec: “How to Choose a Robust Configuration for Equipment
                          for Defect Free Soldering - Reflow, Wave and Selective”

1615-1745pm    KIC: “Fixing Reflow and Wave Related Defects as Well as How to Avoid 
                          Them in the First Place”

 November 10^th, 2011

0900-1030am    Sanmina-SCI: “Process development of 01005 components”

1030-1200pm    Indium: "Lead-Free Assembly for High Yields and Reliability."

1200-1300pm    LUNCH

1300-1430pm    Universal Instruments: "Tutorial on Failure Analysis"

1430-1600pm    Zestron: “PCB cleaning before conformal coating”

1600-1730pm    Kester: “Understanding Soldering Chemistries - Reducing Costly
                          Defects, Increasing Yields and Reliability.

I spoke on “Lead-Free Assembly for High Yields and Reliability." We had several raffles and gave away autographed copies of my book “The Adventures of Patty and the Professor,” which has just recently been formally published. 

As usual, I had dinner at Santo Coyote, one of my favorite restaurants, however my Mexican friends also took me to Sacromonte, claiming it had better food. They were correct. I was convinced to try chicken mole which I liked. It is tough to beat Santo Coyote’s ambiance, however.

I can’t cite data for this, but I am quite sure that GDL has the largest number of workers in electronics assembly outside of Asia. It is great news that they now have an SMTA chapter to help the local engineers network and continue to grow in their skills.  It was great to play a small part in this success, but most of the credit must go to Indium Corporation’s Ivan Castellanos who is chapter president and Kester’s Miguel Vazquez, chapter vice president.

Cheers,

Dr. Ron

 9/ Pre-reflow flux or post-reflow residue?

    - Post-reflow may not be feasible

 10/ Usage affects chemistry available and choice of color:

    - Color agent concentration needs to be optimized so other properties of flux are not affected
    - Experience shows thin films of colored flux are undetectable by eye or vision systems

 11/ Addition of even small quantities of the coloring agent will affect the physical properties to some extent:

    - Rheology: Tack / viscosity / pot-life (usage life)
    - Reflow / wetting / voiding
    - Coloring agent may also affect the electrical properties (SIR/ECM) of a no-clean flux!

12/ Water-insoluble color agent can stain substrates and cause cross-contamination within the reflow oven or final cleaning system.

    - NOTE: The most effective (deeply colored) color agents are not very water soluble.

13/ Color agent must be homogeneously distributed, especially for sub-100micron pitch flip-chip and copper pillar applications.

    - Manufacturing process and QA testing methods need to be developed for each flux and color chemistry

• exhibit reduced viscosity
• spatter during reflow
• produce excessive oxidation of the solder joint

This post was prompted by a Korean customer, who this month asked what the limitations are for aqueous (water-based) cleaning for fluxes used in copper-pillar flip-chip applications. How low can the pitch get before aqueous cleaning becomes unfeasible / impractical?: 40microns? 20microns? 5microns?

Good question. I don’t have a definitive answer, but I do now have an industry consensus that seems to be consistent. I’ll try to answer the query in a little while, but firstly, you’ve got to ask, "What is 'aqueous' cleaning?" Is it:

-        Deionized (DI) water?

-        Water plus a surfactant?

-        Water with a saponifier?

-        Mixed phase (oil /aqueous phase)?

-        All of the above?

DI water alone may be an ideal cleaning fluid from both a reliability and a “green” perspective, but its poor wetting onto even mildly hydrophobic surfaces, high viscosity compared to many low molecular weight organic solvents, and poor solvency for many molecules used in fluxes (resins are a good example) make it a poor choice as a pure solvent. 

It is also important to distinguish between saponifiers and surfactants:

- Surfactants: Usually a nonionic surfactant: most commonly a hydrophilic polyethylene glycol moiety with a hydrophobic carbon chain attached
-  Saponifiers: Usually basic chemistry that chemically reacts with high molecular weight acids in RMA and no-clean fluxes

Adding surface-active agents (surfactants) to water will help it to wet to less hydrophilic surfaces, and so help it move into confined spaces. The advantage of a nonionic surfactant over an ionic one is two-fold; a) there are no potentially ionic residues to cause electrical problems if improperly rinsed off b) the optimum surface-wetting enhancement (so-called “CMC”) is at a much lower surfactant concentration, but note that this also makes it more difficult to rinse off completely.

The general structure of the most common nonionic surfactant is:

               CxHy-(OC₂H₄)_n-OH

On the other hand, the way the saponifier works is a simple acid/base reaction, usually using amine chemistry:

               R’R”NR’” + RCO₂H ---> R’R”NR’”H+ + RCO₂-

The purpose of the basic saponifier is to massively increase the solubility of resins in aqueous solutions, while the surfactant is simply a means of enhancing wetting onto hydrophobic surfaces. Where it gets complicated, is when you realize that the saponified resin is now also capable of acting as a surfactant.

The reason I bring this up is that for smaller pitch flip-chip applications, we are now predominantly seeing the use of small amounts of nonionic surfactants with deionized water, along with other tricks to get the aqueous solution under the chip.

I think I’ll stop there. More next time. Meanwhile, feel free to comment or to email me on this.

Cheers! Andy

At the time of writing, the price of silver (Ag) was approaching the USD$50/tr.oz. (Troy ounce) level, and threatening to go higher. With 1 Troy ounce being 31.1grams, this makes the cost of pure silver ingot close to USD$1.60/gram.

Image from goldsilveroz.com

Materials costs are therefore a major consideration for anyone using silver in any form. Naturally, we are now seeing a few Power Semiconductor packaging houses evaluating the possibility of moving away from silver-filled epoxies for die-attach. The alternatives they are considering include the adoption of solder paste (or solder in some other form: wire / ribbon / preforms) versus a silver-filled epoxy.

Here are some thoughts on the Power Semiconductor assembly pros and cons, based on using solder paste as an alternative to silver-filled epoxies.

Good news (+)

+   Reduced materials costs
+   Improved pot-life / shelf-life *
+   Improved high temperature thermal-cycling
+   Strong, metallurgical joint formed between leadframe (substrate) / joining material / die
+   Improved thermal conductivity
+   Faster throughput (more units per hour, UPH)**
+   Easy clean-up ***
+   Does not wick onto NiPd surface to cause poor wire bondability

 * Although it is true that solder pastes are stored under refrigerated conditions, they do not require the -40C storage that is typical of silver-filled epoxies. 

 ** The dispense of solder paste is very rapid and can be done using multi-dot dispense heads. It undergoes rapid temperature reflow, versus the slow cure needed for metal-filled epoxies, which can be up to typically 1-3 hours, depending on the volume of silver epoxy.

 *** Because the solder paste flux does not cure like a polymeric material,  tubing and other conduits for the solder paste are easily cleaned out using common solvents, or can be simply purged with flux.


  ==================

Bad news (-)

-   Capital costs #
-   Adoption time / new process learning ##
-   Needs a solderable die surface
-   Voiding increase ####

 # The main cost-drivers here are:

- Reflow: Specialty reflow equipment is required for high temperature solders, such as
Heller or BTU reflow ovens

- Cleaning: If wirebonding is required after the reflow process, standard cleaning equipment and cleaning chemistry (aqueous or solvent-based) will be needed to remove flux residues

- Gas: Forming gas (H2/N2) or simple nitrogen may be needed to assist reflow.

Note that increasingly, for clip-bonding (non-wirebonding) applications using the new ultralow residue solder paste Indium9.32, even cleaning may not be needed, as the residue has been found to be compatible with compatible with a number of molding compounds in the industry.

 ## By partnering with a company like Indium Corporation with many years of experience in die-attach soldering, the ramp-up time can be significantly reduced.

 ### A solderable surface is usually a sequence of Ti / Ni / (Ag or Au) plated layers. The thickness of the silver (Ag) or gold (Au) precious metal layer is usually limited to 100nm (0.1microns). Compare this to a standard silver-epoxy bond line thickness (BLT) of 0.5-2mils (12-50microns).

 #### Acceptable voiding of less than 5% of the total die area is fairly easily achieved with good quality substrates and die-finishes.

  ==================

In closing, I am indebted to my friend and colleague Sehar Samiappan (Indium Corporation Area Technical Manager - South East Asia) for his insights.

Contact me to discuss this further.

Cheers!   Andy

The week of March 14th Indium Corporation will be exhibiting at the MD&M (Medical Design & Manufacturing) show in Orlando, Florida.  Actually it is one of many MD&M shows held throughout the country.

We have attended previous shows as visitors but this will be our first as an exhibitor.  We will be showcasing our Flux #2 and lead-free solders for soldering to Nitinol.  Eric Bastow recently wrote a blog post on using Flux #2 and either 96.5Sn 3.5Ag or 80Au 20Sn for this application.

Flux #2 cleans off the very tenacious oxides that form on the Nitinol, giving it a clean surface to solder to.  We will be providing further details and samples of the 96.5Sn 3.5Ag in wire form at the show.  You can also request a sample of the Flux #2 by giving us your contact details.  Stop by and see us at Booth 248-250.

Or you can contact Eric Bastow by email at ebastow@indium.com or me by email at cgowans@indium.com.

• 96.5%Sn 3.5%Ag (221C)
• 80%Au 20%Sn (280C).

Conformal coating compatibility with no-clean flux residues has been a major topic for years – becoming even more popular recently with companies looking to cut manufacturing costs and processes.

Unfortunately, no industry standards definitively determine or define “compatibility” between conformal coating materials and no-clean flux residues. This does not mean that people are always automatically cleaning the flux residues before conformal coating their boards. Nor does it mean that most people are shooting in the dark with their decision to clean or not. I have a number of customers who conformally coat over no-clean flux residues, smart customers who have taken the time to do their due diligence and create their own standards and test methods to determine compatibility. These companies also run the tests and apply their standards on their materials.

Here at Indium Corporation we look at materials compatibility from three different viewpoints:

The first is the simplest: visual appearance. Does the coating look like it has adhered to the board, components, and/or flux residue? A lack of adhesion will usually result in bubbles, crazing, and a number of other visual defects or anomalies.

The next step/test that could be taken to determine compatibility would be to measure actual adhesion. “Tape Tests” are often used to measure adhesion. However, these Tape Tests all have a number of imperfections and variables that accumulate to result in a lack of both accuracy and repeatability. For example, many of these Tape Tests are very operator dependent and rely upon the speed at which the tape is removed, the angle at which it is removed, the force in which it is removed, etc. Different operators can, and do, have very different results. Tape Tests are also dependent on the tape. Variables include: age, shelf life, tack strength, adhesion to certain materials, tape brand, tape width and/or length, even test temperature. Another issue with this method has to do with the conformal coating material. What happens when the conformal coating material is a silicone? There isn’t much that will stick to a silicone, so using the Tape Test with this material is probably worthless. Here are several Tape Test procedures that are present within the industry:

• ASTM D 3359-02
• IPC-TM-650 method 2.4.28.1F
• IPC-TM-650 method 2.4.26

Note that the ASTM test method neuters itself by stating all the possible flaws that could be present.

The third viewpoint is electrical reliability using Surface Insulation Resistance (SIR). Even this is not easy to conclusively determine because there are two different test methods for SIR. One each for:

• No-clean fluxes IPC-TM-650 method 2.6.3.3B
• Conformal Coatings IPC-TM-650 method 2.6.3.4A

Another issue with SIR testing involves 3D parts. The National Physical Laboratory (Britain) and the SMART Group (a British trade association) have been trying to conquer these SIR challenges for years. They do have a draft of a standard written, but nobody wants to stick their neck out, without further testing and proof, to release this standard; so it has been in limbo for quite some time. For further reading on this topic, read this paper, authored by my colleague Andy Mackie and me. It provides further insight into the issues that our industry is facing with regard to compatibility. Note the chart, in this paper, that highlights the differences between the two IPC SIR test methods.

Now that you know Indium Corporation’s position on conformal coating compatibility with no-clean flux residues, it is time to consider the point of view of the companies who manufacture and supply conformal coatings. The majority recommend that, when in doubt, clean the no-clean flux residue before conformally coating. This takes any and all of the guessing out of the equation.

As stated earlier, there are companies that conformally coat over no-clean flux residues with success. Some of these companies are very successful and well-known aerospace, automotive, and military organizations. I am sure they have created their own standards and test methods to mitigate risk and doubt, while assuring performance and reliability. Unfortunately, they have not yet shared their methods and/or experiences with the rest of the industry, so we cannot yet use their expertise to guide us as we converge on one industry standard. If you are one such organization, I’d love to hear from you.

We have not done much work with conformal coating “compatibility” trials due to the vast number of conformal coating materials commercially available and the vast number of no-clean flux formulations that we offer. Even if there were a standard that would define what it means to be “compatible”, the sheer number of conformal coating products, when combined with the sheer number of no-clean solder fluxes, creates an extremely large matrix of necessary tests.

In conclusion: When in doubt, clean.

If you have any other questions or concerns please feel free to contact me at any time.

EASIER:
If you use bare Ni on the surfaces you can use either alloy. More good news, you can also use a less aggressive flux. In this case, consider using a flux such as 4-OA, which is easier to use than the Flux #3, but would still have to be cleaned after soldering.

EVEN EASIER:
If you plate a solderable surface over the Ni, such as Ag, Sn, or Au, then you can use an even less aggressive flux than that, such as a No-Clean type, like 5-RMA.

In the end, Indalloy 281 (58Bi 42Sn) was chosen for the bare copper heat pipe. 
 

Should you have any further questions, please don’t hesitate to ask.  Click LEARN MORE - EMAIL AUTHOR below. Or feel free to make a comment - below.

I just visited a customer that was converting from water soluble solder paste to no-clean. Not exactly a slam dunk transition as this customer found out.

During my visit, solder balls and solder beads were observed in the no-clean flux residue adjacent to discrete components (capacitor/resistors). These could potentially be a reliability concern…electrical shorts.

In water soluble processes, solder defects such as solder balling and beading can be washed away in the cleaning process…no worries. However, introducing a no-clean solder paste often requires that the process be “cleaned” up a bit. Here are some ways to do it:

STENCIL DESIGN:
My first step was to investigate the stencil design for these discrete components. Why? Because, since water soluble post-reflow residues (including solder balls & beads) are washed away, many customers will opt to place as much solder (1:1 ratio) as possible on the pads - to achieve a good solder joint. This is especially true for military or medical applications where a robust solder joint fillet is vital. However, because no-clean residues are typically not cleaned, the solder balls and solder beads remain in the flux residue and may produce electrical shorts.

When printing in a 1:1 ratio, especially if the stencil is thicker than average, solder paste is often pushed under the component and onto the solder mask during component placement. Upon reflow, the sub-component solder paste may not pull back into the solder joint. This is one way that solder balls/solder beads are produced.

No one wants to hear that they need to buy new stencils with reduced apertures, but I did recommend, in this case, that some aperture reduction be considered (generally down to 0402 components). Usually a 10-15% reduction, with home-plate or similar design, is common. Many stencil manufacturers are fully aware of the issue and can make suggestions on aperture designs.

REFLOW PROFILE:
Simultaneously, the reflow profile often needs to be adjusted. In the preheat portion of the typical reflow profile, the first few oven zones are used to drive off flux volatiles, making the paste less "mobile". A balance in the ramp rate is vital; too fast - and small “explosions” may cause paste to spatter into other areas; too slow - and two bad things happen: the flux will spread excessively and the flux activity can be exhausted.

Good Starting Points:

• Ramp rate (IMPORTANT: not max slope, see "Best Practices Reflow Profiling for Lead-Free SMT Assembly" for reference): 1°C/s
• Initial first zone setting: 100-110°C

The following is an example of how a simple procedure like cleaning a soldering iron tip can make a world of difference in the quality of a solder joint. Eric Bastow responded to a customer after doing some testing in the lab – and confirming that a clean iron tip contributes to a clean solder joint:

“As I mentioned in our conversation, I did not think that a flux coated preform would fare any worse than a cored wire in a hand soldering application where charring is concerned. Rosin is rosin is rosin, regardless of whether it is within a cored wire or coating a solder preform. I did a quick experiment to see what would happen.

Using a Weller WS80 soldering station, set to an abusively high temperature of 850F/455C, I soldered some .250” square x .005” thick Sn63 preforms (folded-up as small as I could do by hand), flux coated with 1% NC9, to a nickel metallized FR4 test coupon. The contact time of the iron to the solder was ~5 seconds. The results look pretty good. The charred flux that you do see is flux that burnt to the iron and was transferred to the solder from the previous preform. I would anticipate this sort of appearance with a flux cored wire, as well, used under these conditions. I believe that with frequent cleaning of the tip, the amount of unsightly flux residue with be minimal, especially if a more appropriate iron temperature were used.” -Eric

The bottom image is what happens when you don't clean a soldering iron tip.

Soldering Basics

在表面貼裝技術(SMT, Surface Mount Technology)以前，主要流行的是波峰焊(Wave Soldering).   雖然現在大部分的電子產品焊接都是SMT，但是某些不需要微型化(miniaturization)的產品，如DVD播放機，還有波峰焊的低成本優勢，都是波峰焊技術至今還存在的主要原因。 Indium公司的資深顧問Dr. Ron Lasky曾經説道，波峰焊技術在我們的下一代，下下一代，都應該還存在的。

最近又有一個客戶和我們一起探討波峰焊助焊劑(wave flux)的殘留問題。他們使用的是免洗(no clean)助焊劑。正是因爲免洗，所以各種不同的助焊劑，有不同量的殘留。 而客戶的客戶，也在對殘留的多少有一定的疑問。 其實現在在IPC的規定中，沒有具體規定免洗波峰焊殘留的多少是符合要求的。 最後我們根據客戶對焊接外觀和可靠性的綜合要求，推薦了最適合的一款產品。

Cheers!

PS: 一些年長的客戶或是合作夥伴總是開玩笑說“我在這個行業工作的時間一定比你的年齡長。想當年手工焊接或是波峰焊的時候……”

Pic: http://enc.ic.polyu.edu.hk/Zhengde/z2003/ws/images/pic2.png